Unfortunately, I can't say the film was perfect. I took issue with one small portion of the story and while it would probably be a minor thing to most people, it seems to me Disney inserted one particular scene for no other purpose than to take a back-handed slap against Biblical Christianity. I find that to be maddening.
The issue revolves around a scene where Ebeneezer Scrooge, accompanied by the Ghost of Christmas Present, stands over a local bakery and observes as customers are busy preparing for their Christmas dinner. Scrooge turns to the ghost and accuses him and his brethren of being cruel to the poor by forcing this bakery to be closed every seventh day. Scrooge says it's the baker's livelihood and the only way for the people to get their food, thus it should remain open seven days a week.
The ghost responds by saying there are men in the world who claim to know him and his brethren but in fact, do not. These "men of the cloth", as the ghost puts it, are responsible for shutting the bakery. He tells Scrooge to blame them, not him and his fellow ghosts.
Now I admit, maybe I'm over reacting a bit, but I found this scene to be troubling on several levels. First of all, the closing of the bakery every seventh day is clearly a reference to stores and businesses being closed on Sundays; an old religious custom that is no longer practiced in most places. The fact the ghost references men of the cloth as being responsible is further proof that he's blaming the Christian tradition of keeping businesses shut on Sunday for alleged hardships it might cause the poor.
Second, it was completely unnecessary to the story and as far as I know, is not even part of Dickens original writing. I've seen every version of A Christmas Carol and don't recall this scene in any of them (if I'm wrong, I apologize here and now), so why insert it in Disney's story?
Third, and probably the thing that makes this whole scene offensive, is the implication by the ghost that the religion he represents (necromancy) is somehow superior to Christianity because ghosts would allow a business to remain open on Sunday. This is preposterous! I will gladly stack up the merits of Christianity against those of necromancy any day; Christianity will always come out the clear winner. But that's a different blog for a different day.
But getting back to the idea of businesses being closed on Sundays, do you remember when America used to observe that tradition? I do. When I was young my parents made sure all the grocery shopping was done on Friday night, the gas tank was filled Saturday afternoon, and on Sunday the city was a ghost town except for the churches filled with worshipers. After church we would go home to await the arrival of my grandparents or even pile in the car and go to Buffalo to visit them. Sunday was a day of peace, rest, and family.
I also remember when our city and state leaders began discussing the idea of businesses opening on Sunday. Being that I was so young I don't know which businesses were closed voluntarily and which were regulated, but I do know there was a lot of controversy when the shops and stores began opening on Sunday. One the one hand I'm glad government regulation doesn't prohibit Sunday business; we all could use less government. But on the other hand, would it kill us to honor the idea of the sabbath and voluntarily refrain from business just one day a week?
Stephen Grover Cleveland, the former President, NY governor, and mayor of Buffalo once wrote:
"The citizen is a better business man if he is a Christian gentleman, and, surely, business is not the less prosperous and successful if conducted on Christian principles..."
According to Cleveland, business is better off for both the business man and the consumer when it's conducted according to Christian principles, an idea with which I couldn't agree more. When God remains Supreme and all business is subject to his authority, he will direct things to be done that will benefit all of mankind, across the board. But when business becomes supreme it acts in its own self-interests without regard for those whom it may negatively impact. To me, the choice is clear.
If I could speak to the fictional Scrooge and Ghost of Christmas Present, I would challenge them both to provide historical evidence to support the idea that business must be conducted seven days a week. Did we as a nation suffer significantly back in the early seventies when we couldn't buy gas on Sunday? Are the poor any better off now that they can purchase goods and services on Sunday? The obvious answer to these questions is "no' and I would dare say we were all better off when the nation observed its sabbath of sorts in days past.
I am a capitalist indeed, but I am a God-fearing man first and a family man second. To me, God and family out weigh any perceived benefits of a seven day business week regardless of the economic benefits. When business was closed on Sundays it was a built-in day when everyone was guaranteed to have free time to spend in worship and with family oriented activities. But now, even though most Americans still normally work only five days, having businesses open every day of the week presents boundless opportunities for conflicting schedules. Worship and family time are not planned for or depended upon any more, so these things fall by the way side.
I have owned several businesses in my life time, and although I was always my only employee, I still committed to not working on Sundays. Every once in a while an emergency would come up that would change my plans, but for the most part I remained faithful to the day of rest. I can say with complete confidence that none of my businesses suffered from taking Sundays off. Even if they had, the time spent with my family at church and doing other things together is more precious to me than any amount of silver and gold. So I didn't make a few extra bucks; so I sacrificed a bit of luxury in order to benefit my immediate family as well as my Christian one. Isn't that the precious lesson Ebeneezer Scrooge was supposed to learn from his frightening Christmas Eve experience?
Dickens ended his story on that glorious Christmas morning by saying his grouchy old hero went on to be a man of his word and one who kept Christmas throughout the year. If I could write a sequel it would include Scrooge spending his Sundays with the Cratchit family while the bakery and his own counting house remained dark for the day. The day of rest was God's invention; he will take care of those who willingly honor it, for in so doing we are honoring him.
So God bless us, everyone!
Published by Matthew Gerwitz
Born 1965 in upstate NY; married for 21 years with three kids ages 20, 19, and 15. Matt is a pastor, writer, homeschooling dad, and musician; and very, very busy. View profile
- The Top Five Movie Versions of "A Christmas Carol"When Charles Dickens first wrote "A Christmas Carol," I doubt he could envision what special effects, Walt Disney and Jim Carey would bring his story to life two centuries later. If he could see it now, I think he wo...
- The Role of the Hand of the Ghost of Christmas yet to ComeAn analysis of Charles Dickens' use of the Ghost of Christmas Future's hand to provide commentary on the elasticity of the future in relation to the elasticity of the human heart in A Christmas Carol.
- Disney's a Christmas Carol (2009)Disney's A Christmas Carol (2009) starring Jim Carrey, Gary Oldman, Bob Hoskins, Colin Firth, Robin Wright Penn
- Disney's "A Christmas Carol" Train Tour Dates and LocationsDisney has created a free one-of-a-kind promotional experience.
- My Version of a Christmas Carol: A Christmas PoemA fun hip look at a well known Christmas story.
- Parent Review of Christmas Carol the Movie 2009
- Top 10 "A Christmas Carol" Films
- Ghosts of Christmas
- The Nightmare Before a Christmas Carol
- Disney's Christmas Carol Train Tour Visits Omaha
- The Four Best Movie Versions of "A Christmas Carol"
- The Muppet Christmas Carol




8 Comments
Post a CommentNecromancy? Wow. I realize that the scene in question can be interpreted in multiple ways depending on one's perspective, but Necromancy? Seriously?
I think you got hung up on the Sunday thing and missed the big picture here. People do ugly things in the name of "God", all the time. The Ghost of Christmas Present, who seemed to be a representation of God Himself, was explaining that just because people do things in His name, does not mean that they are His wishes.
THIS is what I think gets lost in organized religion. A PERSON tells you what God wants, who God is, and how God feels and this somehow becomes truth. There are so many different ideas of who God is. It's arrogance to assume that just because you believe something in your heart and feel it to be true, that it must be the one and only truth. It's also dangerous.
Regarding your comment, "Second, it was completely unnecessary to the story and as far as I know, is not even part of Dickens original writing," I would ask that if you intend to review a movie in light of the source material that you would read the source material. The line to which you refer is taken almost directly from the book. Also, it's good to keep a perspective on the time frame of the story and your faith. I feel Christianity is misguided on occasion today, however in Industrial Revolution London and prior misguided was the rule. Anyone remember the crusades? I'm very glad Disney was so faithful to the source material, and find it a little disturbing when people seek to edit the past. Faith, family, and country are what they are and were what they have been, it's our challenge to accept them warts and all.
just saw the movie in Nov. 2010. I agree 500% with your observation. SHAME on the Disney and all who let such abuse simply pass.
LPK - Thanks for your comments. Indeed you are correct that Dickens mentions the sabbath in A Christmas Carol, and in fact the scene I wrote about does exist in his original story, though not the same way Disney portrayed it. (When I originally wrote the the article I had not yet found this information, which is why I apologized in advance if I was wrong.) However, that being said, my distaste remains the same. The day of rest was created by the Creator, it serves a good purpose, we are no better off for scrapping it, and necromancy is not something to be favored. The essence of the scene (as you put it) is a misunderstanding of spiritual things by Ebeneezer Scrooge. A misunderstanding that is shared by his ghostly companion and anyone else who would speak negatively of something God created. Merry Christmas.
To the original author, more research please. Dickens absolutely referenced problems with the hypocrisy of the sabbath in the original story and elsewhere.
To the rest, you've all missed the point. Which is typical and speaks to the essence of the scene (Dickens's and Disney). Find comfort in the bliss that your ignorance provides.
a slap in the face - I think our cheeks will be raw by the time Jesus returns!
Thanks for the comments R.C. I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who has these sorts of thoughts. Blessings tp you and yours as well.
I can't tell you how much I appreciated reading this article. I remember arguing long and hard to keep our county library closed on Sundays, to no avail. Their argument was that going to the library together on Sundays was a nice family experience. As though the experience would be diminished if they did that on Saturday. Aaargh! Thanks for saying what I am very passionate about! Blessings to you and your family.