In an O'Reilly Factor exclusive, Dr. Scheuer alleges that John Brennan was instrumental in obstructing a plan devised by himself and a few, other CIA agents to kill or capture Bin Laden in Afghanistan. As a very special footnote of interest, one of the CIA agents who developed something like 14 different plans to get Bin Laden between 1998 to 2001 was actually one of the agents murdered in the very unfortunate December 30, 2009, suicide bombing on the CIA base in Afghanistan that was in the news just recently. This now-deceased agent, together with Scheuer and other CIA agents, developed one such plan to go after Bin Laden in 1998-but now, enter John Brennan and the rest of the weak-on-terror terror-enablers at the Clinton Administration.
In 1998, Brennan together with former CIA boss George Tenet and then-ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Wyche Fowler, actually got the ear of the Clinton Administration and misinformed them not to-I repeat, as shocking as it is, not to-protect the US from terror attacks, not go after Bin Laden, and, instead, rely on the questionable "allies" in Saudi Arabia to, ahem, handle Bin Laden. Yes, if I was being sarcastic here, then this may actually elicit a snort of laughter from someone, but, unfortunately, it's the truth according to Dr. Scheuer!
Basically, all three claimed Saudi Arabia would "buy" Osama Bin Laden from the Taliban and then hand him over to the US! Insane to believe that, no?! The miserable fact that Bill Clinton gullibly bought this laughable BS of a "plan" to trust the Saudis instead is shocking, but cannot be disappointing since it merely dovetails with what we already know about the Clinton Administration's indisputably failed approach to terrorism. It's also a crying shame Clinton listened to Brennan's misdirection because Dr. Scheuer says that the plan to kill or capture Bin Laden, devised by him and others, would've had a decent success rate of 30%.
Dr. Scheuer is also emphatic in his assertion that John Brennan ought to be held accountable more than anyone for this obstruction to a plan that had a decent chance of killing Bin Laden back in 1998. His reasoning is the fact that Brennan and company were presented around 14 chances to get Bin Laden but didn't; the Saudis had a long, notorious track record of not helping the US after terror attacks in the 90s; and the Saudis also had a shameful history of withholding key, terrorist information from the US for years.
Dr. Scheuer also clearly believes that John Brennan is not the appropriate man for the job of advising the president on anti-terror actions because of his untrustworthy ideology. Scheuer asserts that the problem with Brennan is he's too hesitant in taking the decisive steps necessary to aggressively go after terrorists. He also damns Brennan by condemning him as someone who is more obsessed with "politics" and not having Obama look "bad" instead of protecting Americans, which, ironically, John Brennan ought to be concerned with the most! As I exposed earlier, Brennan's ideology should be viewed at best as highly suspect. Can you really trust a man with this ideology to do a good job on anti-terror policy?
Additional Reading: Islamic Terrorism on the Rise Domestically and Internationally Since Obama Became President, Unapologetic Obama Claims buck Stops with Me, but Refuses to Fire Anyone In Lack of Accountability, Embarrassed Obama Finally Admits Detroit Terrorist Was not Isolated But Linked to Al-Qaida
To send Marc questions, praise or criticism, you can email him at marc_schenker@telus.net
Sources:
Michael F. Scheuer, Wikipedia
Bill O'Reilly: Is Counterterrorism Advisor John Brennan Up To The Task? - 1/13/10, YouTube
Pamela Hess, AP source: CIA officers believed killed in attack, AP
Byron York, Bill Clinton's Excuses, National Review
Published by Marc Schenker
Contact Marc at marc_schenker@telus.net to praise, criticize, or request anything of him since he fears nothing or no one. Marc Schenker is a political junkie and Political Writer and Analyst for Associated... View profile
How the American People Are Giving Osama Bin Laden What He WantedOsama bin-Laden didn't want much out of his explosive life before he seemingly died of typhoid in 2006 - he just wanted America to completely abandon its moral authority and lea...- Breaking News: Pres. Bush Learns that Osama Bin Laden is Still AroundAfter ignoring since learning he was responsible for 9/11, Pres. Bush returns to the subject of Osama Bin Laden...just in time for the fearlections.
- Why Osama Bin Laden Should Be Deemed the Most Influential Person of 2006Good, bad or indifferent, Osama Bin Laden has had a most profound effects on world history. His reach crosses borders and oceans and has traveled to remote parts of the world. He defines the world influential.
Thoughts from a US Senate Staffer: Why Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, and Is...One does not have to agree with Osama bin Laden in order to understand him, but understand him we must-for his war is now ours as well.- Nancy Pelosi and Osama Bin Laden: Is There a Connection?Has House Speaker Nancy Pelosi been having secret talks with Osama bin Laden? This chilling phone conversation may disturb you. Rumor has it that it's a wiretap of Pelosi's office. Is it? You be the judge.
- Osama Bin Laden Dyes His Beard - Why?
- Did President Bush Play Right into the Hands of Osama Bin Laden in His Reaction to...
- Osama Bin Laden in Iran? What Could that Mean for Us?
- Saul, Paul and Osama Bin Laden
- Satire - Chilling New Osama Bin Laden Video
- The Fringe Benefits of Finding Osama Bin Laden
- Osama Bin Laden is Alive and Well





9 Comments
Post a CommentWell, it's only political consistency that Obama would pick an incompetent as chief security advisor. It's pretty incredible, too, that Panetta, Blair and others weren't consulted on reading the Christmas bomber his rights.
I've added you to my favorites. Nice job on this article.
Not surprising, but nothing is anymore. Out where we live - in the true boonies of Montana, we have no police or fire - but we also never have crime. WE are responsible for ourselves and our neighbors - the country might take a lesson from that.
Bin Laden might have been captured by now if we hadn't spent so much time in Iraq. Instead, after 9/11, when we clearly knew bin laden was responsible for the attack, we instead went after Saddam Hussein. And even now we're still ignoring North Korea.
I've added you to my favorites. Nice job on this article!
My observation may offend some folks, but when I see Osama Bin Laden's name, I can't help but read between the letters. "Obama and Biden" our President and Vice President. Hmm... doesn't that kind of look like Osama Bin Laden's name???
no*
Well done, Marc. Each time that I've seen Brennan on TV (especially that press availability with Napolitano) he seems hopelessly incompetent at the very least. He's soft on terror; there's not doubt about it.
Good article Mark