Creationism

Current trends in a number of states is the introduction of legislation requiring the teaching of creationism as fact as an alternative to teaching evolution in science classes without understanding the term theory" as it relates to actual science.

Should we allow the theory of creationism equal weight to the theory of evolution?

The evolution of humans remains a theory, and creationism can't be tested scientifically. Scientific inductive reasoning has limits and must make assumptions. Creationism makes assumptions, also. Both views can coexist for now.

The question of whether or not to teach creationism in public school classrooms has a long history but has surfaced in Illinois in recent weeks.

Debating the idea of an instantaneously created universe. A student's perspective

A study made to investigate Creationism as being the correct biblical view.

Illinois Governor Candidate Bill Brady doesn't mind a little creationism being taught in schools. Did Brady smoke some of that medical marijuana he's in favor of before discussing social issues with the press?

Which idea belongs in our state funded public school science classes?

There are better arguments against creationism then evolution.

While still a hot topic in many states, you don't hear much about teaching creationism in Maine. At last night's Republican debate candidates were asked if creationism should be taught alongside creationism in Maine's schools.

How the theory of creationism and evolution in public schools is being applied today, and my take on the issue.

Arguments to both sides of the issue are presented, with a slight opinion towards creationism.

Too many have set down to choose either side of creationism vs. evolution. This is a third side that looks into both being right.

Is it possible to believe that we were created by Lord our God and also believe that we have and can evolve?

An oped, with thoughts of whether Creation or Evolution put us on this planet. Explains Chrisitanity and their view,so why not believe as one is pleased.

In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters. Then God said, "Let there be light"...

While Evolutionism and Creationism are both a present day debate regarding the origins of life, they both imply a dispute between the interpretation of the creation story and the proponents of evolution.

Creationism claims to be a science. But all science must be consistent with all other science--but creationism is at odds with the simple scientific principles for how a lightbulb works. If creationism is right, then why do lightbulbs work?

Discussion of a possible way to open up the terms of the stalemated cosmological controversy regarding origins.

Creationism in public schools has been a hot debate in recent years, resulting in lots of new legislation as well as new religious cults (FSM, anyone?). Here's a biochemists opinion on where creationism belongs.

A look at different facts and theories inside both creationism and evolution.

Intelligent Design, or ID, is often labeled as creationism in disguise. However, there are a few differences which are outlined in this article.

Unfortunately, the issue of the theory of evolution versus the claim of creationism (or its surrogate, inferred intelligent design) in our science classes has not been for once and for all laid to rest.

Complexity and diversity of life could be explained by evolution and creationism. What are these opposing views that both tell us why their are so many new and complex animals and plants on our planet.

Economic policies have the power to make or break a nation. But when does economics transcend science and become the opinion of the economist? And who will be suffering the consequences?

McCain's VP Sarah Palin believes the world is 6,000 years old. What's worse is that she want to teach our children that in public schools!

The evolution-creationism controversy is the epitome of the constant struggle between faith and science. Proponents of creationism have been critical of Darwin's theory of evolution since its publication in the late 1800s.

Article about the different versions of creation and why it shouldn't be part of public education.

Ben Stein has given us a classic movie character, great tips on making money in the stock market and knows how to write well. But he's not a diplomat--and we need one to bring the evolution and creation sides together--as well as all the other potential sides...

The creationism, evolutionism and supreme being progress theories also have merit in a timeframe hypothesis.

It is a threat to educational integrity to condone public schools' teaching of acutely religious ideas, such as creationism, which are derived solely from religious doctrines.

Karl Popper's definition of a scientific claim is that it can be proven false. Can either of these actually be proven false?