Battery is one of the many intentional torts. This article will explore what has to be proved to be successful in a battery claim.
A plaintiff has to show two things to be successful in a battery claim against another person. First, the plaintiff must show that the alleged batterer has committed an offensive contact. Second, the plaintiff must show that this offensive contact has been made to the plaintiff's person.
An offensive contact is, essentially, a contact that is not permitted by a reasonable person. For example, if someone comes up to you at a bus stop and punches you in the face, this would be an offensive contact by pretty much anyone's standards. If, however, a person comes up to you and taps you on the shoulder at the bus stop to ask directions, this would probably not be considered an offensive contact because most people would allow another person to tap them on the shoulder. This person, therefore, would not be able to be successful in a battery claim.
In other words, if a person is very sensitive to a particular kind of contact, but most other people would not be sensitive to the same type of contact, the sensitive person will not be able to bring a successful battery claim. The law is written this way because we, as a society, do not want anyone to bring claims for actions that would not be offensive to a reasonable person.
A plaintiff's "person" includes not only the plaintiff's actual body, but also include anything the plaintiff is holding at the time the alleged battery is committed. If, for example, you were walking down the street holding your cell phone in your hand and someone wrestled it from your hand and ran away, this would be considered a battery to the plaintiff's person even if that person never touched your actual body.
As with anything in the law, there are always arguments to be made that something does or does not meet the definition. However, the steps above should give you a working knowledge of what actions do and what actions do not constitute a battery.
Published by Jason Webb
B.S. in Psychology. J.D. View profile
- Policies Change as Society's Views and Beliefs ChangeTort follows policy factors when deciding a case. Policies change as society's views and beliefs change; policies must portrays societies views and beliefs.
- Basic Legal Concepts Relevant to Insurance: Practice Questions and SolutionsSection 25 of The Actuary's Free Study Guide for Exam 5 offers five practice problems and solutions on some basic legal concepts relevant to insurance - including different types of legal systems, types of laws, and t...
Legal Definitions: What is a Tort?civil torts are usually lesser-known than criminal actions, but it is a subject which people should be aware of- The Search for Personal Injury LawyersFinding the right personal injury lawyer to assist you in your personal injury case can really be overwhelming especially when you don't have any idea on where to go and who to run to.
- Personal Injury Lawyers in Melbourne Australia - Questions You Need to Ask Before...Do you live in Melbourne Australia and thinking of hiring a personal injury lawyer? This article will help you decide whether you're likely to have success in filing a personal injury claim.
- Are You Eligible to File a Personal Injury Claim Lawsuit?
- Suing Pharmaceutical Giants: The Ugly Truth Behind Mass Torts
- Intentional Torts, Strict Liability, and Remedies for Torts: Practice Questions an...
- Pedestrian Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Intentional Tort, Negligent Tort & Absolute Liability
- Understanding Legal Terms: Plaintiff
- Assault With and Without Battery: Associated Damages and Legal Implications




