Transubstantation Versus Consubstantiation: Doctrine of the Holy Eucharist

Different Christian Doctrines Regarding the Holy Eucharist

Rebecca Caroll
In my recent article entitled "Pope announces procedure for Anglicans to enter into full communion with the Catholic Church," I made mention at the end that one stumbling block for Anglicans is the Roman Catholic doctrine of Transubstantiation. I was reminded by a reader that, "most Anglicans including Episcopalians believe in the 'real presence' of Christ in the Holy Eucharist but they do not call it transubstantion." (Note: spelling of commenter) In order to address this issue properly, I researched the concepts of Transubstantiation, Consubstantiation and Sacramental Union. These doctrines truly demand much more discussion than this article can provide in five hundred words. However, I thought it important to differentiate between the Roman Catholic doctrine and other doctrines of various Christian denominations.

Catholic doctrine is quite clear on their belief of transubstantiation, which describes the nature of the Eucharist in metaphysical terms. Roman Catholic's have faith in the literalness of the words spoken by Jesus. The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines transubstantiation in section 1376:

"The Council of Trent summarizes the Catholic faith by declaring: 'Because Christ our Redeemer said that it was truly his body that he was offering under the species of bread, it has always been the conviction of the Church of God, and this holy Council now declares again, that by the consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called transubstantiation."

According to Catholic doctrine, once consecration of the bread and wine has taken place and it has become the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ, it remains as such until it is entirely consumed. The body and blood of Christ that is not consumed during the celebration of the Eucharist is reserved for the next celebration and is venerated as the body and blood of Christ.

Consubstantiation also attempts to define the nature of the Eucharist in concrete terms. However, unlike transubstantiation, consubstantiation doctrine declares the "substance" of the body and blood of Christ is present alongside the substance of the bread and wine, which remain. Where Catholics believe the bread and wine is changed completely into the body and blood of Jesus Christ, believers of consubstantiation believe the body and blood of Jesus Christ and bread and wine exist together in the Eucharist.

Martin Luther defined his doctrine as the sacramental union. Luther rejected consubstantiation, as he believed it substituted biblical doctrine with a philosophical interpretation. In his 1528 Confession Concerning Christ's Supper, Martin Luther wrote,

"Why then should we not much more say in the Supper, "This is my body," even though bread and body are two distinct substances, and the word "this" indicates the bread? Here, too, out of two kinds of objects a union has taken place, which I shall call a "sacramental union." because Christ's body and the bread are given to us as a sacrament. This is not a natural or personal union, as is the case with God and Christ. It is also perhaps a different union from that which the dove has with the Holy Spirit and the flame with the angel, but it is also assuredly a sacramental union."

Therefore, Roman Catholic doctrine regarding the Holy Eucharist is substantially different from other Christian viewpoints. Some Lutherans believe in consubstantiation, while others reject it in favor of Luther's sacramental union doctrine.

To read more from this writer on the Roman Catholic Faith:

Pope announces procedure for Anglicans to enter into full communion with the Catholic Church

Vatican City, Athens & Mykonos: Inspiring Travel Destinations

Belmont Abbey College Faces Discrimination

RCIA: Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults

Sources:

Personal Experience

CatholicApologetics.org

NewAdvent.org

answers.com-consubstantiation

wiki.answers.com-transubstantiation vs. consubstantiation

anwers.com-sacramental union

Published by Rebecca Caroll

Rebecca is a person passionate about life! She is a ardent supporter of adoption and an advocate for children with Special Needs. Outspoken on all things political, she always enjoys robust debate. Her fai...  View profile

21 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Tina Twito11/16/2009

    Catching up on all your great work today!

  • Christine Zibas10/29/2009

    I was raised Catholic, so I take a lot of the Church's teachings, like transubstantiation for granted, not really thinking about it. Now, as an adult and reading this article, it sounds kind of morbid and strange...very cannibal-like. Hmmm.

  • Catherine Spencer10/27/2009

    Very deep...I need a dictionary for some of these big words :) So informative.

  • Jedley Manimtim10/27/2009

    Very intersting and informative

  • Crystal Ray10/27/2009

    Very interesting! I was a member of an Anglican church before I moved.

  • Patricia Sheasley Sicilia10/25/2009

    12 years of catholic school and I don't believe anyone ever told me this! Actually, as I am what they refer to as a "recovering Catholic," my thoughts on the crucifixion and communion are that I have a problem with any religion based on a human sacrifice and eating someone's body and blood! And we think some pagan religions were barbaric!

  • Robert O. Adair10/25/2009

    Interesting and informative.

  • Dan Reveal10/24/2009

    The Catholic religion is very beautiful! Thank you very much for this information!

  • Sheryl Young10/24/2009

    Once again, interesting stuff. My denomination takes Lord's Supper.

  • Julie Darleen10/23/2009

    Very clear and informative on the differences. Thanks!

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.