Truly Trashy TV: A Review of Decision House

Ruth Dickson
I see a lot of television. I don't watch a lot, but because I use TV for background noise while I work, it's always on and I do give it the occasional glance when something particularly execrable catches my ear. This is how I found "Decision House", arguably the sleaziest, dumbest and most exploitative of any show currently on the air.

Produced by Jay McGraw, progeny of the self-important Arbiter of All Things Human, Dr. Phil McGraw, "Decision House" is an offshoot of "Divorce Court", and is, like that pseudo-legal outing, presided over by Lynn Toler, who may or may not be an actual judge, but who bills herself as one for the purpose of both programs. Ms. Toler apparently recruits candidates for "D.H." from rejected or leftover participants of "D.C.". The hapless couples volunteer to be locked up together for three days in constant view of cameras while various professionals bully, exercise and "counsel" them.

This show is a grotesque mélange of "Big Brother", "Jerry Springer" and "Deal or No Deal". Accompanied by appropriate ominous music, it starts with an announcer intoning, "Three Days. Two sides. One couple on the brink." In a house that looks like the victim of an explosion at a Sherwin-Williams factory (every wall is a different, garish, clashing color), complete with unmatched furniture, cheap motel wall décor and oversized fake plants, they air the dirtiest of laundry for the edification the world. Thus far, we've been treated to abusers, alcoholics, spendthrifts, slobs and bigots, with a healthy helping of adultery to further confound the experts.

These include a couples therapist, a financial advisor, an attorney, an anger management specialist and...are you ready?... a uniformed drill sergeant! Each "expert" has a segment during which the couple is alternately scolded, chastised, questioned, made to do pushups and hold heavy objects while being yelled at and ultimately forced to set fire to their credit cards. Between segments, Ms. Toler earnestly tells us what we've just seen and what we are about to witness. And, oh yes... there's the "ring ceremony" which consists of Toler taking the couple's wedding rings at the beginning of the episode and holding them until the final denouement, at which time they are asked to Decide whether or not to retrieve them. Divorce or no divorce? Deal or no deal?

In the event that you have not as yet sensed my reaction to this noxious exemplar of personal pain and degradation as entertainment, I will clarify: Decision House is a disaster area. Nobody should live there and absolutely nobody should visit.

Published by Ruth Dickson

Published author of eight books, many magazine articles; outspoken controversy, humor and satire are my genres.  View profile

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Kurt8/26/2008

    I watched two episodes of this show last night. It was like watching a train wreck. I couldn't turn away, even though I knew I should. This is just a bunch of psychotic wives and uncommunicative husbands neither of which seems to be aware of the basic psycho-biological differences between men and women.

    The women imagine that their husbands can't "feel" and their men imagine that their wives can't "think", and they're mostly pretty much right. Couples need to stop expecting their spouses to act like them. We're wired fundamentally differently and we used to have societal structures that honored those norms. In the 1960's, we created socio-political new realities in the interest of "equality" that never took into account our biological predispositions, and we forever altered the marital bargain. And we wonder why marriages fail. PC political liberalism is antithetical to our biology, and is at the core of our divorce explosion.

    This show merely proves it.

  • DrDevience10/13/2007

    Yep. They don't update the Page Views on any regular basis, but they do pay for them around the 8th of every month ;)

  • Ruth Dickson10/13/2007

    Hi Lori! Didn't really expect any comments on this. Thanks for stopping by. And spread the word...I understand I might actually get paid for readership here (unlike another site which shall remain unnamed).

  • DrDevience10/13/2007

    Ahhh reviewed as only you can. I'm sure this was much more entertaining than the show itself is ;)

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.