Typing Yourself into a Corner

D.R.Scott
There's a nasty trend going around Hollywood, and I don't like it.

Movies aren't bothering to have proper endings anymore.

It's different from a TV series with a mysterious storyline that's cancelled before it reaches a proper conclusion. No, it's seeing a frustrated screenwriter type himself into a corner and sneering at the audience, "Fuck it, this is too hard" and quit. It happened in No Country For Old Men and There Will Be Blood. It's having the chutzpah to ask your audience to do a crossword puzzle with no answers provided.

And I think it's David Chase's fault.

Obviously, David Chase doesn't care what you and I think about his controversial, non-ending of The Sopranos. So what? To him, it's already old news. Let's move on, nothing to see here. "I have no interest in explaining, defending, reinterpreting, or adding to what is there," he said. Bang. Well, that clearly has a last-nail-in-the-coffin finality to it.

But Chase earned his hard-won arrogance. As a veteran TV writer who fought bravely in the battlefields of programs like Northern Exposure and The Rockford Files, I'm sure corporate suits have unbuttoned their trousers and rained on his dreams more than once. How many times can you argue about Art to color-blind idiots who can't see a rainbow because they can't find the profit margin inside? Thanks to his profitable and critically-acclaimed gangster soap opera, Chase is finally in a position of power. So why shouldn't he do what he wants? Would Michael Corleone kiss Fredo's pinky ring?

Although it's true that you can't overestimate the value of a good writer (for proof, just take a long, hard look at all the empty, overproduced, special effects-heavy but narrative-challenged "epics" in Hollywood), I do think Chase's anger is misplaced. First of all, HBO did green-light The Sopranos afterthe other major television networks turned it down, and did give Chase the creative freedom he needed. More importantly, this unsatisfying, lazy cop-out of a conclusion to a groundbreaking TV series was a betrayal to the people whose loyalty and support made TheSopranos a hit from the beginning: the audience.

We've seen what happens when TV and movies are dumbed down to that infamous lowest common denominator. As Bill Cosby said, "I don't know the secret of success, but I do know that failure is what happens when you try to please everybody." The Sopranos never treated the audience like boobs. It made money, got huge ratings, and even received enthusiastic high fives from literary highbrows.

Still, you didn't need a college degree to see that the last Sopranos episode fell limply between a bang and a whimper. The end of a classic TV series is an important landmark. It's the final opportunity to tie up loose ends, find some type of closure, and reaffirm whatever it was that the show was Trying To Say. Six Feet Under did it, as well as M*A*S*H, The Mary Tyler Moore Show, St. Elsewhere, Buffy The Vampire Slayer, and Homicide. But The Sopranos didn't. It was a mob hit; it was a shot in the back of the head at night in the middle of nowhere. And now the Coen brothers and Paul Thomas Anderson are accessories to the crime as well.

David Chase welched on a deal he made with us. One hand washes the other, capisce? If he did that to Tony Soprano, the big lummox would've busted both his legs. Yo, David, why are you pissed off at us, huh?

Didn't you get everything you wanted?

Now, thanks to you, we have to deal with these crimes of creative omission done by copycats pretending to be artists. Sure, maybe they can justify it intellectually, but for me it brings to mind an old saying by an unknown philosopher: "If you can dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit."

Published by D.R.Scott

I'm a freelance movie critic. Whether it's a noisy, testosterone-fueled, shoot-'em-up adventure flick or a moody, character-driven B&W foreign film, I'm open-minded. I just want to see a good movie that has...  View profile

1 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Audrey M. Brown3/27/2008

    I TOTALLY agree with you! To me, if you get to the end of your script and you don't have an ending that means something, you go back to the beginning and start over. Why even bother beginning a story if you aren't going to close the third act with some kind of statement.

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.