The icing I speak of includes the song,"The Saints Are Coming", as performed as a collective effort with Green Day. Premiered originally during the reopening of the New Orleans Superdome, it's an outstanding take on the original by The Skids. As they performed at the game, the two bands created an awe-inspiring force that made America shut up and listen. They drew attention to the poor response the US made to help those in need of help after Hurricane Katrina. The other new song, "Window In The Skies", is a much brighter, more reflective song. There were two different music videos created for it. One pays homage to the other bands in the business while the second is a montage of pictures from their youth. It displays how they didn't just wake up to become some of the biggest rock and roll stars on earth.
Bono recently justified his band's decision to release this new album of old songs. He stated that his band wanted to release another compilation album before such collections become "uncool". He really does have a point. Today, songs are usually sold as single units on iTunes. It seems as though there isn't any interest to listen full, complete albums anymore. Even though I'm one of those teens with an iPod, I completely understand why U2 would release this collection. Bono also mentioned that they wanted to reach out to new, younger fans. That's always been U2's philosophy: to stay at the top of the charts and readily accessible. This release has certainly brought their names up in the media.
Finally, there is one last dispute over U218, as the songs "I Will Follow" and "Gloria" were not included on this record. Because these two songs are very much a part of U2's staple hits, I don't understand why they weren't included. I guess releasing an album entitled "U220" would be a little overwhelming. There really are quite a few songs on the album already, but the order they're in seems completely random. Songs go from recent to old, old to more recent, very recent to old... It just doesn't make much sense. But, in the scheme of things, I don't think it's right for me to question how they're handling things. Whether it's a dispute over the order of songs, songs that should've been included but weren't, or whether or not they should release an album at all is completely up to them. U2 know a thing or two about what works. After all, they celebrated their 30th anniversary as a band last September and are now thriving stronger than ever.
Published by SoleilJaune
- Dylan's Greatest Songs, Not Hitsif we had to throw into the sea all but fifteen Dylan songs, which would they be? If someone had never heard him before and you got fifteen songs to highlight his legacy, which would you choose?
- "Greatest Songs of the Sixties" by Barry Manilowan overview of the album "Greatest Songs of the Sixties" by Barry Manilow
- "Greatest Songs of the Seventies" by Barry Manilowan overview of the album "Greatest Songs of the Seventies" by Barry Manilow
- Ten Greatest Songs by Al HirtDuring his peforming years as a virtuoso trumpet player Al Hirt built a reputation that was aided by the recording these ten great songs. Solos, specialty numbers, ensemble pieces and pieces that include vocalists a...
- 10 of Baseballs Greatest SongsA list of some of the best baseball songs of all time
- Top Ten U2 Songs: The Greatest Songs from the Greatest Band
- Top Ten Songs by U2
- Top Ten Songs by Bob Dylan
- Top Ten Songs by Bob Dylan
- Top Ten Songs by U2
- U2 Can Be Bored to Death by This DVD
- Top Ten Songs by U2

