Unassisted Childbirth: Dispelling Myths About Freebirth
It is Only Frightening to Those Who Don't Understand It
Freebirthers birth completely alone without including friends, family, partners, or other children. Only the mother is present. An unassisted birth is one that occurs without the presence of a medical professional, such as a doctor or midwife. Most unassisted births do include persons other than the mother, such as close friends, other family members, or their husbands. An unassisted birth that occurs when the mother is completely alone is a solo or autonomous birth.
Freebirthers never receive any medical intervention whatsoever; they do not seek medical attention at all. Most unassisted birthers prepare themselves to handle any and all situations that could arise and to recognize emergencies that would require professional treatment. Most will go to the emergency room or at the very least call a midwife if necessary. We simply chose to include professionals only when truly necessary. An unassisted birth where the mother refuses to see a professional or interfere for any reason whatsoever is called a Zion birth.
Freebirthers fear, hate, or have no respect for medical professionals. We have the utmost respect for people who provide care to those in need. We just don't believe in asking for their help unless it's really needed. We want as natural an experience as possible, but we do also want to be safe. We feel that the high rate of intervention in the hospital is unsafe for the average patient. Because of the risks, we want to avoid unnecessary intervention.
Only low-risk patients chose freebirth or can have a safe freebirth. While most unassisted birthers are low-risk, there are many with medium or high risk who chose freebirth and have a very positive outcome.
Freebirthers don't receive prenatal care. We're all different. Some see an ob/gyn or midwife, and some do their own prenatal care. Some have an ultrasound or other testing, and some decline. Some follow the recommended check-up schedule, and some only have one or two checkups per trimester. Others will just take good care of themselves physically, nutritionally, etc. while paying close attention to how they are feeling in order to detect any problems.
Freebirthers care more about the birth experience than their child's safety. We actually see unassisted birth as the healthiest and safest choice, as we can avoid unnecessary and dangerous intervention from medical professionals by birthing this way. We feel natural birth is far more safe than an interventionist one.
Freebirth is a fad, phenomenon, trend, act of rebellion, political statement... It has actually been practiced for centuries, since the age of man began. Midwives and doctors didn't always exist. In many cultures women birth alone or assisted only by family, friends, even young girls just entering puberty or their younger children. Freebirth has been around in America for quite a while as well; it's just gaining in popularity as more people turn away from interventionist hospital births. Moreover, it's getting more publicity now, as more and more people have the courage to speak up about it.
The reason freebirthers chose this path is ___. Freebirthers all believe ___. There are a wide variety of reasons for which people chose to birth unassisted. Most of us have multiple reasons. We may share some reasons in common with others, but every freebirther has her own reasons for her choice. Likewise, we all have our own beliefs about birth.
Freebirthers don't have access to medical interventions such as C-section, drugs, pitocin, or forceps. For one, these things aren't necessary in most births and can be dangerous. Moreover, items such as forceps can be ordered online but are rarely needed. While some freebirthers do live quite far away from the hospital, most live close enough that they can simply call an ambulance if necessary and arrive quite in time for treatment to be successful. Choosing to birth unassisted doesn't mean you can't or won't go to the hospital if you need to or that you can't have intervention if you want or need it. (A hospital with an excellent birthing center is less than ten minutes drive from my home, and I could easily get in the car and go there if I wanted an epidural!)
Both doctors and midwives consider freebirth unsafe. Few doctors are friendly to unassisted birth or homebirth in general, but some are. The majority of midwives are opposed to the practice as well, but there are many who are friendly to it. As time goes by, more professionals are opening their minds to this new practice. What one must keep in mind, though, is that doctors stand to lose money and clients when people turn to homebirth and freebirth. If those practices became the norm, obstetricians would lose most of their income and clients and maybe need to find a new job. Then again, obstetricians don't only exist to assist in birth; they also provide birth control, treat STDs, and help with overall fertility health. Most of their business is from pregnant women, though. While not generally motivated by money it is true that if a person freebirthers rather than paying for a midwife-attended homebirth, midwives lose money and clients. If that became the norm then midwives could go out of business.
Studies have shown that freebirth is dangerous. There is little data available on unassisted birth. One data collection did demonstrate a high neonatal mortality rate of 19. However, this was a Zion birthing community, and the information was collected over two decades ago. Other, more recent sets of data from unassisted birthers--not Zion birthers--suggests that freebirth is quite safe. One set of data about 201 unassisted births has a 0% mortality rate for mother and child; the mothers were of various ages, delivered at various times, were of varying risks, had different approaches to prenatal care, and were carrying babies of many sizes. Another set about 295 births had a neonatal mortality rate of 10 to 1000. One of those 3 deaths occurred because of uterine rupture associated with vaginal birth after C-section,a factor that makes a woman medium to high risk. Therefore, that data suggests a rate of 6.77 per 1000 for a woman with no previous C-sections--about the same number as the national average. There is no guarantee any of those infants would have lived had they been born in a hospital environment because of the circumstances. No controlled studies have actually been done, for who would fund them? (In the freebirth community I participate most, there have been over 40 births and no deaths since November 2006.) A large-scale study of much more than two or three hundred births would provide clearer information about the safety of freebirth.
Children injured in freebirth may be able to sue the mother some day, just like the mother can sue a hospital, doctor, or midwife who causes injury. This is not currently true, and if it ever did become true, it would only be for those children injured by the actions of their mothers. This would mean that the court would have to determine what caused the injury and if the injury would definitely have been prevented by physician-attended hospital birth. Children can't currently sue their parents over parenting decisions that cause harm, such as circumcising or vaccinating them, so it's doubtful they'll ever be able to sue them for freebirthing. The fact that the child would have to prove it was a planned unassisted birth, not an accidental one that was not the parents' fault, makes this even more true.
Freebirthers don't want the best for their children. Oh, please, we love our children just as much as any other parents and want what is best for them. We simply feel that freebirth is a safer, more beneficial option than hospital birth in most situations.
Freebirth is reckless, irresponsible, and dangerous. Most unassisted birthers do immense research to prepare themselves to handle whatever may come up and to know when to go to the hospital. They have to be more educated and more responsible than those who chose hospital birth, because the birth is in their hands--not someone else's. They often take infant CPR and resuscitation classes, rent an oxygen tank, and have various tools available in case needed during the birth. They don't just practice breathing and learn about common interventions; they learn how to midwife themselves in a sense. Unplanned freebirths are very dangerous, because the mother usually has not educated herself as to how to birth without assistance or handle emergencies. Unplanned freebirths happen when the mother is unprepared, and they end badly more often than planned freebirths--but not all the time.
Freebirth is outdated and just as dangerous today as it was centuries ago. Many deaths that occurred back then were due to ignorance. Things are very different now. We know how to detect and treat many more problems. We have better sanitation and hygiene practices. Risk of infection, disease, and illness are low. Our homes are clean. We know to wash our hands. We are capable of recognizing and handling emergencies. People are more educated today than ever. People are less likely to be overworked and malnourished, because we understand nutrition and aren't as poor. The average American woman has a very low risk of her pregnancy ending in sorrow, and its not just due to technology available in hospitals. Birth overall is much safer today, as is life.
Freebirthers are not irresponsible or stupid. They have done a lot of research to educate themselves and are taking full responsibility for their choices. They care as much about their children's safety as any other parent does; they just have a different view on what is the most safe birth choice and environment. Freebirthers aren't trying to impress, shock, or make a statement; they are just doing what they feel is best for their family. Everyone's reasons for choosing this path are different, but they all have one thing in common: the desire for a natural, safe birth for their child.
Published by Heather B.
I'm young single mother of two boys, a liberal Democrat, and a born again Pagan witch for nearly 14 years. I write about natural family living, pregnancy, homebirth, attachment parenting, and religion or pol... View profile
-
Childbirth is Safe for Today's American Women, but Why?
Many believe that technology, prenatal care, and hospital interventions are the reason why birth is now so safe (and thus that homebirth & freebirth are not safe)...but how true...
-
Unassisted Childbirth: A Viable Option for Some
Unassisted childbirth, or free birth, is the act of having a natural birth without any outside help or hindrance.
-
Home Birth and Unassisted Birth are Nothing New
On the surface it seems that the growing trend towards home births and unassisted birth is something to feel shocked about, but our foremothers might have begged a differ.
- Is Unassisted Childbirth Legal? Yes, but there are 3 important things to consider if you're planning an unassisted birth.
-
Your Homebirth and Unassisted Birth Paperwork
You have always heard that when you have a baby at a hospital that you will have to fill out a lot paperwork, well what about if you have the baby at home or unassisted.
- What If Something Goes Wrong in an Unassisted Birth?
- Why Do People Chose Unassisted Childbirth?
- What You Should Know: Unassisted Childbirth/Freebirth
- Why Women Choose Unassisted Childbirth
- A Guide to Unassisted Childbirth
- Unassisted Birth Gains Popularity in Europe
- Frequently Asked Questions About Unassisted Childbirth
- Freebirthers believe unassisted birth is the safest choice.
- They learn to handle 'complications' and recognize emergencies.
- We are all different!
36 Comments
Post a CommentNot supporting freebirthing means not supporting women. It is so prejudiced to assume that women need to be in the hospital to have babies "in case there are complications" but men don't need to be in the hospital when they have erections in case of priapism. Why are womens' bodies defective and not men's?
Freebirthing was the number one way of birthing before hospitals caught on. Most deaths and problems that occurred were not due to natural birth, or due to lack of education (do we need education to eat and poop??) but due to unsanitary conditions, pollution, and artificial ignorance- reliigous induced and otherwise- about the body. We are born knowing how our bodies work! We need no education!
Hi Heather, I agree with the desire not to be violated. I had a male doctor walk in rudely without knocking during my birth at the hospital. Hospitals will lose patients if they don't respect them.
So women should be allowed to have abortions but not to choose their birth location? That's ridiculous. It's not selfish to exercise your right to bodily integrity, to not want to be violated during birth. People have WAY more reasons than that for birthing at home or freebirthing. It's not even about being violated or mistreated but about the complications and risks that come with those unnecessary, invasive interventions which you clearly know nothing about. Epidurals, for example, can slow your labor, causing you to need pit and an amniotomy, which increase your risk of fetal distress and thus your risk for C-section, which comes with higher death rates, risk of breathing problems for the baby, bleeding for the mother, etc. My son was checked at 5 days for diseases, and most diseases won't turn up before then anyways because they need to have a certain number of feeds first. And I had an epidural with my oldest son who was born in a hospital, and I screamed just as loud at his birth
Oh and forgot to add that you say its only frightening because I dont understand it. But I actually really researched it after i saw the show freebirthing on DH, and I am now even more iritated by it than i was just after watching the show! And really believe that these people should be getting checked for chemical imbalances!
I really think this whole freebirthing issue is totally outrageous! I personally think that anyone who would even consider this type of ignorance should really get to a mental physician ASAP! It is literally one of the most insane ideas that I have ever heard in my life. And anyone who would do such a thing obviously has absolutelly NO regard for the health or well being of the child! To me it sounds a little selfish to want to have it at home because these crazy women feel violated by DOCTORS(you know the people with all the years of training),to me that should not be an issue but only the babys well being! I would rather my child live and all diseases checked for before I attempt to take this tiny life home! And they talk of pain free birth, well that why they have epedurals! This should be outlawed !
Those are all contraindications to homebirth in general. Twins are usually delivered successfully at home as well as babies that are near-term, but I agree with you on all of those points. I don't believe I would recommend UBAC either, but I would support a woman in her choice--always.
I would also not be recommending UBAC. Reason being that the most common sign of uterine rupture is a non-reassuring heart rate in the baby, so continuous fetal monitoring is recommended (if not, you should be checking the heart rate every 15 minutes). As I understand it, if your uterus ruptures, they don't have much time to get the baby out. Also, anyone planning a TOL (trial of labour-it's not called a VBAC until you've actually given birth) should ask her care provider how her incision was done. Any vertical component to the incision means you MUST have a repeat c/s because the risk of rupture is too high. Also, if there's meconium in the waters the baby should really be born in a hospital. Meconium means that the baby has had a lack of oxygen at some point. While this does NOT necessitate a c/s, it DOES mean that you need continuous fetal monitoring and people there in case the baby inhales meconium and has breathing problems.
Personally, I would not recommend a freebirth, but I could see it being safe if you were prepared and your pregnancy was low-risk. There are, however, situations where you should not be doing freebirth: 1) Preterm baby. 2) Multiple gestations (higher risk of complications, also higher incidence of premature babies). 3) I would not recommend it if you've had 5 or more babies prior because your risk of bleeding is higher due to a lack of uterine tone. Homebirth might still be an option, though. 4) Mother has a history of hemorrhaging-increases risk with the next baby. 5) Mother has pre-eclampsia or gestational diabetes. 6) Mother has a history of a coagulation disorder, increasing her chances of bleeding. 7) Mother has signs of placenta previa or vasa previa (placenta or blood vessels covering the cervix) or placental abruption (placenta detaches too soon)-these commonly necessitate c/s's.
Way to bust those myths! Thanks for the excellently informative article! I agree with you 100%! MZ
Great job at updating the info Heather. :-)