Will somebody in Hollywood tell the pseudo-documentarians to lay off, I repeat lay off, the hand-held camera technique?
"United 93" was a hideous film. In trying to reenact the 9-11 airliner catastrophe, focusing on the only one of four hijacked flights that did not reach its intended target, it wrecked a historic moment and ruined a heroic moment for the average Americans who gave their lives to save ours that day.
It was reminiscent of Oliver Stone's failed "Alexander," where overuse of close-up, shaking cameras dominated much of the action footage.
As much as I am drawn to historic films, and as much as I wanted to maintain an air of positive feeling toward the heroes of United 93, it was impossible to endure this terrible piece of celluloid.
It made a plausible tale totally implausible. Even when incorporating many characters in the various command centers that day as themselves (those were the best scenes by far, nothing from inside the airplane itself was even viewable), the story deteriorated into an unrecognizeable blur.
It was a relief when the plane finally crashed.
There was a brutal anti-Bush flavor. They seemed to be obsessed with lack of direct contact with Air Force One and Bush, and even the vice president. It does beg the question as to why Bush didn't know anything until the planes were crashing into the World Tarde Center.
What I was looking for were at least a couple of scenes focusing on the people the passengers were feverishly calling on the airline credit-card seat phones and personal cellphones. All we got were the pathetic good-byes on one end. What about the people they were talking to?
Directors should treasure the value of wide shots as well as the all-intrusive closeup. If they do, then more tragedies like "United 93" can be avoided.
Project Seek: Onassis, Kennedy and the Gemstone Thesis
There's More Where This Came From
Published by Radicalpatriot
Gerald A. Carroll is an Air Force child who has lived in 10 states and Japan, plus being born in Alaska. Guess he's still an American, along with being a musician and former newspaper editor, reporter and co... View profile
- An Analysis of the United States Oil Policy and OPECThe article gives analysis of United States policy towards OPEC and how this policy has hurt the country. It lists alternatives to the current policy along with the pro's and cons to the policy and arrives at the aut...
Bush Administration Targets Nations for PiracyThe Bush administration has targeted 12 nations for failing to protect American producers of copyrighted material from recurrent piracy. This action may lead the administration...- An Overview of the Non Profit Sector in the United StatesFind out why the United States has a non profit sector and how its role relates to the roles of government and business.
- Top Ten Reasons George W. Bush Will Go Down as the Greatest President in U.S. Hist...A humorous look at the prospect history will vindicate the presidency of George W. Bush.
Hugo Chavez at the United Nations: Where's the Punchline?At the United Nations General Assembly last month, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez had harsh words for United States President George W. Bush. In the aftermath, the U.S. mainst...
- Sharity
- Visiting and Living in Portland, Oregon
- DVD Review - United 93
- The End of Khruschev and the Rise of Brezhnev
- Film Analysis: Comparing My 100 Greatest List with the AFI 100 Greatest List
- Top 10 Most Significant Movies of 2006
- Canada and Australia Are Banning Light Bulbs... Are the United States Next?
- "United 93" was a hideous film.
- It was reminiscent of Oliver Stone's failed "Alexander."
- It made a plausible tale totally implausible.


1 Comments
Post a CommentGerald- A good review, but I would strongly urge you to omit the line that said it was a relief when the plane finally crashed. It will be interpretted wrong and could cause you alot of grief.