Unrest Spreading All Over the Middle East and Caliphate is the Goal. Progressives Seem Pleased

When the Egypt protests began last month Glenn Beck was the first major media personality to go to press with a prediction based on historical observation and current issue analysis. Beck said protests would spread all over the Middle East.

Beck called it right when he said social media was behind the organizing of "spontaneous democratic protests" as the left has sweetly named the unrest in the Mid-East. As well he was dead on accurate and factual when he linked radical leftists to radical Islamic extremists. He DID NOT say they necessarily colluded in organizing the allegedly "spontaneous" but merely that radical leftists and radical Islam saw unrest and chaos would serve their eventual end goals.

For that accurate historical and current event appraisal, Beck was and is vilified by MSNBC talking heads along with nearly every other sundry leftist on this rock. Beck is painted as "paranoid, a conspiracy theorist, an insane fear monger" and other sweet and generous things along those lines.

At this time there are ongoing and intermittent protests in Libya, Bahrain, Yemen, Tunisia and a few other nations. What part of protests in multiple Middle Eastern nations is NOT dead on accurate by Beck's appraisal? What part of Beck's allegations that radical leftists and radical Muslims seek similar methods in achieving their end goals is inaccurate?

If one reads the words of radical leftists it's abundantly clear they advocate for unrest to assist in creating a climate whereby ordinary citizens will demand change due to the unsettling upheaval and unrest. Read Frances Fox Piven. Read Van Jones, who wisely in terms of his end game and methods, advocated for "giving up the radical pose" for a more quiet and insidious method of creating discontent. This means less in your face protests and rhetoric in favor of subterfuge.

Is it mere coincidence that American radical progressives have the same denigrations of America that radical Islam has? Don't radical American leftists call for an "end to evil capitalism?" And don't radical Muslims call for a confrontation and end of "American imperialism and capitalism?" Gee, don't these two calls to action sound eerily similar, in fact almost perfect repetition?

Is it coincidence that when international anti-American types blather on they sound almost EXACTLY like domestic progressives? Folks, when international entities call for an end to America as constituted and traditionally structured, and their words, concepts and methods almost perfectly dovetail with radical American progressives, what have we? "...all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC!"

Have reader's heard of the protests over the teacher's unions in Wisconsin? The rallying cry of some of the protest organizers in Wisconsin is to emulate the Cairo protests. What does this mean, in reality and practical result? Isn't it interesting if I call radical American's out I am a potentially violent conservative employing violent and hateful rhetoric, yet Wisconsin protest organizers advocating their minions emulate the violent Cairo demonstrations are just fine?

Don't radical American leftists generally side with Muslims in characterizing Islam as noble and worthy, yet American Christianity as evil and Hell bent on theocracy? Odd too in that radical Islam's desire for a global or at least Middle Eastern caliphate does not concern American leftists at all. Why? Isn't a caliphate a THEOCRATIC desire? Are progressives just this lame and transparent? Hypocrites of the most extraordinary fashion?

Lefties get to claim they were speaking "extemporaneously," whereas my "extemporaneous" calls are violent and threatening. Lack of civility is only something a conservative can engage in, huh? BS. I will not knuckle or cave to their games. I will give them what they give me. Appeasing and trying to negotiate with Progressives is playing the pre-WWII Europe game of appeasement.

Radical progressives will not go away because we defeat them at the ballot box, nor will they go away by trying to get along with them. Bush and his "No Child Left Behind" tried that and all we have heard is how terrible Bush and "No Child" is. The truth is when one reads progressive intentions it's clear they favor almost anything including violence to achieve their ends - don't blame me for saying the truth...blame progressives for their own words. Radical progressives will not go away because by trying to get along with them.

Progressivism is insidious. It is not honest on its face. It has a hidden agenda never publicly spoken about. If we are to save this nation we must completely expose progressive ideology and their desires...the real desires and not the lip service of "social justice" which is code for complete redistribution of wealth, and many other things like moral relativism and historical revisionism. If this nation is to be righted and returned to Founding principles the progressives must lose their ability to influence the idiots who love a good bandwagon jumping on.

Wishing away evil will not make it so. Evil must be confronted and dealt with in no uncertain terms. Remember, for evil to prevail all that is needed is for good men to do nothing. The desires of radical progressives are not anything traditional Americans would rightly recognize. Remember, "all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC!"

It's time to settle this to save this nation from these people. Yes, they have the right to their beliefs, but the right to a belief is not tantamount to the privilege to govern buy "the consent of the governed." Progressives can hold whatever asinine belief they wish but that right does not bestow upon them the right to force us to their will. I will fight that with every ounce of my being. They will have to kill me first.