The reason that Pluto was in danger of losing its designation as a planet is that over 2500 astronomers from 75 countries are meeting in Prague to define the definition of a planet. It was originally thought that the status of Pluto was in danger of losing it's planetary designation at the hands of an intolerant scientific community who wanted to pick on the little guy for daring to march to his own orbital plane. They would like you to believe that I couldn't have been further from the truth in my previous article. They are trying to set themselves up as the good guys. I see right through them though. My hat is off to them though. They tried. Indeed, those shameless few who miss this article will likely buy into their hate propaganda. Those who make such decisions (always with me in mind) would have you believe I am far less tolerant than the astronomers in Prague.
On August 24th the astronomers will be voting on a new definition of planet that makes me , on first glance, look like an intolerant bitch that we all see in Ann Coulter to their fun little liberal, free loving, war hating Jeanine Garafolo. Why? Because through being overly tolerant, they manage to dodge all of the claims of intolerance. They are very sneaky, yet in a way they are right. I DO think maybe the tolerance can go too far. Here's an example. Under the new definition for the term "planet", every round object orbiting the sun is a planet, unless it orbits another planet. But there is a big caveat: If the center of gravity, called the barycenter, is outside the larger object, then the smaller object is a planet. In other words, if we shot Rosie O' Donnell into space, she could be designated as a planet. (Was that mean? I think maybe that was mean)
Scientists expect to find hundreds if not thousands of other bodies matching this description in the outer solar system during the next few decades. Furthermore, some of the bodies currently called moons could be given planetary status. Charon, Pluto's largest moon would be elevated from moon status to planetary status. (By the way, I stand corrected from my previous article. Hubble has found two more moons orbiting Pluto, Nix and Hydra. (Nix's name apparently meant to make us think more diminutively of Pluto and Hydra, a reference to a mythological dragon with multiple heads… a name obviously designed to scare us. Don't tell ME there isn't an anti-Pluto conspiracy going on! I'm on to you, you Pluto haters!).
Under the new rules, as the moon retracts from earth and creates its own barycenter, in time even our own moon could be considered a planet. I wonder what they will call it?
In my opinion, the new rules are sly, but their purpose doesn't get by me. The Astonomers are OBVIOUSLY Pluto haters in sheep's clothing. By letting EVERYONE into the club they effectively take away the power of the club's exclusivity. In other words, Pluto can be a planet, but so what? So could Oprah Winfreys head. Brilliant strategy, except for one thing. I'm on to you! You are the same folks who would suggest that Irish people be invited to join the NAACP, or that Israel be invited to join the Arab League with full member privileges. In your world, Jesse Jackson would be invited to be the grand master of the Ku Klux Klan, and Pedophiles and Beastophiles would be considered A-OK, born that way and welcomed with open arms into the GLBT community. In fact, they would call it the GLBTBP community, and the Pride parades would be that much more interesting. Yes indeed, there IS a thing as too much tolerance.
Luckily I am on to the agenda of these Pluto hating scientists. Once again I say. LEAVE THE LITTLE GUY ALONE! I see no one is saying anything about Mercury. Is Mercury calling the shots here? Whose REALLY calling the shots. Pluto is a hard working planet…. Has to travel further around the Sun than any other planet, and it does so the best it can and never ONCE have I heard a complaint about it. I'm always hearing things like "Damn it's hot. The Mercury is rising". (I think they even made a movie called that) What a whiney little bitch of a planet! Down with Mercury. I hate Mercury and I have approved this article. Paid for by People for an Endless Winter.
Published by Tiffany Ranae
I am a 3* year old pre-op transsexual woman with a history in religion and politics. If you want to think about old things in new ways, I'm your girl. If it's not original, I won't write it. View profile
- Pluto in PoliticsThroughout history Pluto has caused both wondrous and catastrophic changes in our political systems.
Prince Ready to Unleash 'Planet Earth' in Late JulyPrince has big plans for his new album, 'Planet Earth,' which will be released in the United States on July 24th via Columbia records. If Prince has his way, it will go down as...- Fifth Planet Orbits 55 CancriAstronomers, using funding from the National Science Foundation and NASA, have discovered a planet circling a nearby star that might have moons that can support life.
Pluto is No Longer One of the Nine PlanetsScientists have decided that Pluto is better classified as a dwarf planet instead of a true planet.- Warren Moon, First Afro-American Quarterback Inducted into the Pro Football Hall o...Warren Moon will be inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame not only because of his performance but also because of his determination to be a quarterback at a time when Afro-Americans were not accepted in that pos...
- Is Pluto Really a Planet?
- Is Pluto Really a Planet or is it Something Else?
- In Loving Memory of Pluto the Planet
- Pluto Still Not a Planet - Shouldn't Size Count?
- Pluto: The Once and Future Planet?
- Planet Pluto Has Been Demoted
- The Solar System Rebooted
- DOWN WITH MERCURY
- I Love Pluto
- Wake up America. They are trying to kill a hard working planet




7 Comments
Post a CommentIt is a good thing to classify objects in the solar system if they are planets or not. It is never too late to identify pluto as it is a "dwarf planet". This is very important for future students, researchers and learners to prevent facts, data and information confusion.
..
You have the rules distorted. Pluto is now a dwarf planet which is...."any other round object that has not cleared the neighborhood around its orbit, and is not a satellite"
How about a planet be anything with an atmosphere that has a revolution around a star and not another celestial body? Oh wait, that does not good, Mercury is excluded.
How about an orbiting body revolving around the sun with satellites? Oh wait, Venus AND Mercury become non-Planets.
ANd whats wrong with having literally hundreds of planets in our solar system Greg? Nothing.
How is Jupiter a planet? It has no core, is just a ball of gas. It could very well be a brown dwarf or failed star. With the plethora of satellites around it, it could very well be a failed star. And why is Neptune and Uranus considered gas giants when neither of them are like Saturn and Jupiter (both have rocky cores, whereas Jupiter and Saturn do not)?
But most importantly, what the hell are astronomers arguing over something like semantics when there are hundreds and thousands of other more pressing questions that not only need answered, but need to be ASKED?
Pluto isn't a planet, it's a KBO (Kuiper Belt Object). If it WAS a planet, literally hundreds of other objects would be as well ... as this new contoversy admirably proves. The only thing keeping Pluto a planet is sentimentalism; as far as science is concerned, it's a KBO (just like Xena and Sedna and all the other iceballs out there on the fringe).
I think they should "grandfather" pluto in as a planet and anything found from now forward will be classified as something else.
Beware the anti-plutites....your second article on this is much lower rated than your first, even though it is even better...have they gotten to you? Pluto Rocks! (or it is a rock..lol)