"You have the right to an attorney and if you can not afford one, then one will be appointed to you by the courts."
The thing is though is that we actual take that for granted. The reason is though is that this was not always our right under the VI Amendment when it came to the right to counsel. While we did have the right to counsel the courts for a very long time did not have to appoint one to us if we could not afford one. If you could not afford an attorney then you just did not get one during any criminal proceedings.
In 1932 this changed slightly though and more in favor of those who could not afford to hire their own counsel. In Powell vs. Alabama, the Supreme Courts ruled that in death penalty cases only that counsel must be provided to what was considered poor people.
Just 6 years later, the Supreme Court would again change the way the VI Amendment protected individuals rights to counsel during a criminal proceeding even if counsel could not be afforded. In Johnson Vs Zerbst, the Supreme Court ruled that counsel must be afforded to poor people for federal felony cases. State felonies did not apply to this new ruling.
It would take another 4 years for state cases to be included into this protection of rights in the VI Amendment. I942 Betts vs. Brady was when the Supreme Courts ruled that counsel was to be appointed to individuals during non-capital state cases. However, this change came with a stipulation. Counsel only had to be afforded during state cases that were non-capital cases for those that were handicapped with mental retardation or mental illness.
It would be 1963 during Gideon vs. Wainwright that we would finally see the right to counsel the way we know it to be now. It was during this court case that the Supreme Court ruled that counsel must be provided during all federal and state misdemeanors and felonies.
We take our rights and the protect of the Bill of Rights for granted so often. As you can see, the Supreme Court rulings are what have shaped the VI Amendment as well as so many other Amendments into what we know them to be now. It was a long road from 1791 to the present to get the rights that we have now. Our forefathers gave us broad rights under the Bill of Rights within the Constitution. The Supreme Court is what defines the definition of what the rights mean to us.
Published by Antoinette McGowan
I am a stay at home mother. I love writing. Many topics interest me when it comes to writing. View profile
- Do the Miranda Rights Really Protect Your Rights?An overview of the Miranda Rights, several cases involving the Miranda rights, officer brutality and coercion
- Supreme Court Attorney Adresses Hot Button IssueThis articles speaks of Mark Stancil and his experience trying to defend his client Martin Bustillo in front of the Supreme Court. This details his discussion of how foreign nationals are handled in the United States...
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Late Term AbortionThe Supreme court ruling banning partial-birth abortions made on April 18, 2007.- Due Process of the Law - What Does it Mean?At its core, the right to due process of the law is the right to be treated fairly and have a fighting chance when facing legal action.
- Amnesty International Pleads with Supreme Court to Uphold Prisoners' Rights to Hab..."The Supreme Court has twice delivered the message to the Bush administration that judicial review and civil liberties cannot be discarded."
- The Role of Attorneys in Protecting Us All
- The Importance of Independent Counsel for the Government
- Finding the Right Divorce Attorney
- The Importance of Democracy in America
- Children and Parents - Religious Fights Over Medical Rights
- Supreme Court Rulings Affecting Education
- Survey Says: Americans Don't Understand the Power of the Supreme Court




2 Comments
Post a CommentGreat detailing.
Nice work! Thanks -