States and Family Courts Profit from the Creation of Non-Custodial Parents!
Is this in the best interest of the children?
States and family court systems profit when a child is ripped away from one of their parents!
Credit: Robert Pedersen
Copyright: Robert Pedersen
Published by DaddyBlogger.com
Registered Nurse and Step-mother who is actively involved in children's rights. Thank you everyone for visiting my AC Page. http://www.daddyblogger.com View profile
3 Comments
Post a CommentIt's all about the money -- for the therapists and attornies. The children are the collateral damage.
You are right. However, there is much more. Award of primary custody to any one parent when there are two, deprives the child of it's heritage and basic right to an identity. It is on the fringe of human trafficing. Seizure by the Court of 50 % of a families genetic material. It is
inhumane and reduces child to the equivalent of
a puppy litter.
The US Family Court System is profiting from
the collection of the collection of every dollar
that comes through its enforcement agency.
It receives two thirds of every dollar that comes through its enforcement mechanism. If say,
it collects 4 Billion dollars a year (Pennsylvania).
The state is reimbursed 2.67 Billion dollars from the Federal Government. A major conflict of interest for family courts.
Not to mention that this a violation of the US Constitution.
One parent does not have to gain primary custody. It is the way in which family laws are
applied and practice. The Judges are responsible for this. There is a major move
Minister Ronald Smith absolutely drives the point home that children need a balanced diet of a mother AND father! Thank GOD that our Nation's counselors, ministers, and leaders are understanding the importance of both Mothers and Fathers!
Lary Holland
http://www.laryholland.com