The $700 billion that taxpayers will pay to save Wall Street allows Obama, the most politically liberal candidate since Lyndon Johnson, to also focus on Main Street.
Obama can't quite say it this way, for being at risk of being labeled a Robin Hood in a selfish society, but on the bottom line he wants the "haves" to share with the "have nots." He advocates health care for everyone, for example, and he would establish the tantamount to a government jobs program for everyone. Lyndon Johnson? How about Franklin Roosevelt in terms of being liberal -- or as the liberals now call themselves, progressive.
The Wall Street bailout, sadly enough, removes $700 billion from an already sparse table for doing more for the poor. It pushes the national debt up to $11 billion, or about $37,000 for every man, woman and child in America.
But as noted on a San Francisco Chronicle website, beyondchron.org, the conservatives who oppose domestic spending can hardly brand Obama as "tax and spend" while their Wall Street business buddies are getting bailed out. They no longer are in a position to brand Obama as a budget buster, now that they are busting the budget themselves.
Everyday people need not understand the workings of "mortgage-backed securities" or even "deleveraging" to perceive along with Barack Obama, that the reach of government goes far beyond welfare or Social Security. The government controls the entire economy, and in fact spending for the "have nots" constitutes only a small fraction of the federal budget. A lion's share goes to middle-class entitlements. And now for Wall Street? Welfare for the rich. Obama has his issue. Obama has his platform.
Obama has advocated a federal expense of $150 billion, over a 10-year span, for alternative energy. Foes have said this is an example of big spending, big government. But now we have a Wall Street bailout that will cost nearly five times as much. How can the Obama critics continue to crow?
"The media frames Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson as an 'independent' oracle of financial truths," states beyondchron.org. "He made hundreds of millions of dollars at Goldman, Sachs from deregulation, and will be going back to Wall Street in a few short months. Why should Paulson be viewed as anything other than a lobbyist for Wall Street?" Ditto for all Republicans.
In the process, Barack Obama can cast himself as a lobbyist for everyday Americans. If money can be found for Wall Street, why not for health care and why not for a jobs program? The Wall Street bailout fell into his lap at exactly the right time.
SOURCES
www.beyondchron.com
Published by Michael Thompson
Michael Thompson is a retired newspaper reporter who lives in Saginaw, Michigan. Main topics are political and social justice issues, with occasional escapism into sports and so forth. View profile
The Passing of the $700 Billion Wall Street BailoutLegislators came to an agreement with the White House Sunday, September 28 on the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street, according to the Associated Press. Congressional lawmakers...- Barack Obama Addresses Newton, Iowa, Crowd on December 30Barack Obama (D, IL)spoke to a crowd of would-be caucus-goers in Newton, Iowa at the Newton Senior High School on December 30th, and obliquely rebutted some of the charges being aimed at him by other front-runners in...
Who is Neel Kashkari? and Why is He Qualified to Deal with the $700 Bil...Neel Kashkari was selected to be the head of the $700 billion rescue effort for financial institutions.
The Reasonable Barack ObamaThis is an editorial piece about why I think Barack Obama is so popular as a presidential candidate.
President Obama Chastizes Wall Street Bankers for Accepting $18 Billion...President Obama calls the $18 billion in Wall Street bankers' bonuses "shameful."
- A School District, Olmsted Falls Near Cleveland, Seeks a Share of the Wall Street...
- $700 Billion Bailout Plan Fails in Congress
- Contrast: Wall Street Bailout, Auto Industry Bailout
- Virginia Senator Jim Webb Nails the Most Excessive Wall Street CEO Salaries
- Senate Vote Passes $700 Billion Wall Street Bailout as $850 Billion Rescue Package
- Oliver Stone's "Wall Street" is More Relevant Than Ever
- Obama Upset with Wall Street Executive Bonuses

5 Comments
Post a CommentQuit trying to be so logical. You see, if we only cut the 18 billion in earmarks the budget would be balanced. Just ask Maverick McCain. Seriously, great piece!
I feel sorry for both candidates because the compromise is more "business as usual" for our country.
Food for thought:
Wall Street's special offer - but you must act now!
AmericanChronicle.com
September 23, 2008
http://americanchronicle.com/articles/75216
Let's bail out the greedy, the crooks, the suckers
AmericanChronicle.com
September 22, 2008
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/75078
Let's hope people see the forest for the trees here. Our government has been spending more money bolstering the wealthy and creating new do-nothing agencies in the last eight years than we spent (in real dollars) on the entire New Deal to emerge from teh Great depression... Great article.
Excellent writeup and analysis. The Wall Street bailout is definitely an example of why this country needs a president with a different take on things.