This clashes, however, with another new line of thinking. According to the global warming movement, Carbon emissions come from everywhere - including the air we breathe and the gas emissions of cows. Every time carbon dioxide is emitted, we lose just that much more time on the calendar - Al Gore even went so far as to promise a year our planet would turn into a great ball of fire.
Armed with the Nobel Peace Prize, this failed presidential candidate has made a huge case for cutting carbon emissions for the sake of the environment. Removing cars, many reason, would be a great way to cut back on the carbon emissions and stave off the global warming that man started back in the 14th century that thawed us out of the little ice age.
There's a great answer to this however - an answer that solves the environmental problem, as well as an economic one. If animals convert oxygen to carbon dioxide, they create a remarkable carbon footprint that they have no hopes of offsetting with the purchasing of trees. Therefore, rather than leave these little buggers to ruining our planet, the answer should appear obvious:
Fur coats.
Thousands of fur coats are sold every year - just imagine how many animals, as a result, are not damaging our atmosphere with carbon emissions? Just as importantly, however, the economic impact would be remarkable. With all the worries about jobs and spending, the number of new work opportunities that would come from the fur industry would be astounding. Between the hunters, the skinners, the machine sales, maintenance, shipping, crating, inspection, retail - the economic impact from a fur industry boom would be staggering.
But most importantly, it allows someone to offset their carbon footprint in the only way that really matters - by preventing something else from emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. In many ways, it is the natural evolution of our paleolithic ancestors. Where nature armed the animals with the ability to warm us, likewise nature has armed the animals with our ability to protect our environment and warm ourselves.
Therefore the only logical answer to stop global warming and to cut carbon emissions is not to buy a tree, which will offset carbon regardless of your purchasing it, buy a fur coat, and ensure that something really won't be tarnishing our atmosphere with its gastric emissions and unnecessary breathing.
Published by Chadd De Las Casas
I was born in Valencia, California in 1987. It's ironic that I turned out to be a writer, since my first exposure to it was an essay about why I hate writing. I am also the owner of the Content Producers Wiki. View profile
- The Adventures of the Idea Seekers: Sarillion's Climate Crisis: Video Game Teaches...KidsCom.com just added a new virtual game that teaches kids about Global Warming in a way that they can see and understand. Here is some more information on the game:
- Biologist: Global Warming Puts Water Supplies in Trouble Sarah Afshar interviews a biologist and chemist about one of the most current, yet controversial issues in the world, global warming.
Al Gore's Global Warming Campaign Gains Another DetractorGlobal warming is an issue that has taken center stage over the past years. The debate is heating up.
IPCC Global Warming Report Draws CriticismA Candaian group has published an "independent summary for policymakers" to deny that global warming is mostly caused by human activity, namely the burning of fossil fuels. The...- Global Warming: The DebateAmericans are being scared by those in power by being told that the Earth is going to end as a huge oven if we don't do something about the cars we drive, the energy we consume, etc. But just how real is this threat o...
- 10 Ways to Help Stop Global Warming
- The Problem of Global Warming:The Extinction of Earth's Animals
- Global Warming or Solar Warming?
- It's Rabbit Season...No, It's Duck Season...No, It's Global Warming Season
- Scientists Research Temporary Global Warming Solution
- Up with Global Warming
- How World Citizens Can Fight Global Warming
- Every fur coat means millions of less carbon emissions.
- Animals emit carbon.
- Fur coats do not.





12 Comments
Post a Commentthis page is so unture. I wanted to throw up when i read it. who would believe this junk???? you animal hater!!! whos brain is even sick enough 2 even come up with garbage like this???????? It's ubsurd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
p.s. I AM VEGETARIAN!! SAVE THE ANIMALS!!!!!!
Oh I don't need any excuses to wear what I can rightfully claim as mine - it's just nice to know that I'm offsetting carbon without having to kill my offspring as you advocate.
How about promoting vegetarianism and putting an end to mass animal production which release carbon into the atmosphere. Also the amount of chemicals released into the atmosphere during the production of fur coats also contribute to GW. Why don't the humans take more responsibility and stop producing more humans which are basically carbon emmission tools their whole lives. Stop looking for lame excuses to wear something that's not rightfully yours.
Yeah that's cool, because I mean, advocating politically based ethnic cleansing is awesome and all that. Glad to see one's political ire is such that they'd advocate that level of absurdity.
Ok, I'm fairly adept at killing things. Sounds good to me. I wonder however, how much I could reduce our carbon footprint by killing all the right wing religious nut bags. Hell, I could make one hell of a skin coat! I wouldn't even waste any of the hide being as I'm a great shot with a rifle and could take them all out with head shots;-)
MasterPo I already wrote an article on that, go look up my "Why Al Gore is Just the Head of a Pagan Religion Devoted to an Angry God"
The British High Court recently found Gore's film contained at least nine errors and exaggerations so egregious they contradict the United Nations' claims on the subject (no mean feat, since the UN anchors the alarmist corner of the global scientific debate). And those errors weren't trivial. They were exactly the allegations Gore makes that turn global warming from an obscure scientific issue into a potential global crisis: that it is man-made, will cause flooding, is killing wildlife, and so on.____ {http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/article.cfm?artId=22355}
Freaking great! Now where's my cat fur coat?????
No really AHD, just think about the SIDE benefit. With all those animals that aren't emitting carbon dioxide and ruining our atmosphere, the global temperatures will cool. Then, instead of being caught flat footed in the cold, we can gleefully bite our thumbs at nature, because we've already got all those coats. It's a win win scenario. Make it colder AND be prepared for said cold!
I seriously hope you're joking. I have a novel idea: get rid of scumbags who think animal abuse is okay and let's have a line of human skin coats. I'd rock it.