Was Shakespeare a Fake?

Could the Author of Shakespeare Be Someone Else?

Gemma Argent
Everyone loves a good conspiracy, especially when it involves such a beloved topic as the great poet and playwright William Shakespeare. For the majority of people, Shakespeare was simply an obscure man who wrote and performed in myriad plays in London, England back in Elizabethan times. But for those scholars and amateur sleuths who chose to delve a little deeper, a puzzle arises. Could the man we know as Shakespeare truly have written such complex and masterful works?

For anyone visiting London, the home of William Shakespeare at Stratford-on-Avon is a must see tourist stop, along with the Globe Theatre and Poet's Corner in Westminster Abbey. But, could it be that these historical markers could all be incorrect?

What if there really was no author by the name of William Shakespeare? What if someone else wrote the dramatic and comedic works and was forced into using a pseudonym to protect his, or their, true identity?

The late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries were turbulent, primarily due to politics and religious persecution. Queen Elizabeth I was born in 1533 to Henry VIII and Ann Boleyn, his second wife. When Elizabeth was only about three, her mother was executed, leaving her to be raised with tutors and handmaids. She learned quickly how important it was to remain secretive and to watch every word and every step. She was imprisoned in the Tower of London, where some speculate that she met a fellow prisoner named Robert Dudley, rumored by some to be her future husband and lover.

Armed with this information, some groups believe that Queen Elizabeth gave birth to two sons, one of whom became known as Sir Francis Bacon, the great philosopher and statesman. If such a child existed, remaining hidden and disguised from the public, provided a top education by the secret generosity of the Queen herself, couldn't he have written plays centered about political and courtly intrigue? Bacon had earned a reputation as a great writer, schooled in law and languages, and had many friends in high positions.

Bacon can easily be considered a likely candidate, but, on the other hand, so could Christopher Marlowe, or any number of other exceptional writers. Or the pseudonym of Shakespeare could have been taken as a collaborative effort of all or several of these writers, just as the Greek poet Homer is thought by some to be a name taken by several authors, Shakespeare could be, too.

Published by Gemma Argent

Freelance writer/editor for more than 5 years. Have written articles and essays for pint and online media. I'm also a single mother and proud 'parent' to a Sphynx (hairless) cat.  View profile

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • john smith12/16/2009

    It wasn't bacon it was de Vere

  • SEXGOD!!!11/17/2009

    wat the f*ck shakespear is sexy he cant be a fake, the boy i had xxx with yesterday loved shakespear so i think shakepear is hott and he would love a go on my pussy! :P

  • MyLord15/28/2009

    shakespeare is a fake

  • lolzx4/20/2008

    ....
    idb (i don't belive) ....

  • mr f. baco was of real decent4/2/2008

    mr f. baco was of real decent

  • bob10/12/2007

    how do i copy and paste it

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.