The Soviet Union's Luna 2 mission was finally accomplished on September 13, 1959 landing the first man-made object on the moon, however, it was reported as "crashed" on the lunar (moon) surface at 100 mph during this time period in history, sending back incredible scientific radio signals data, before crashing into the moon that were immediately beneficial to its mission regarding any magnetic field(s) and also seem to have NO evidence of radiation belts as the reported earth, thus in return began the "space race in the early 1960's" with our historic and great assassinated (1963) president called John F. Kennedy.
"Was the moon landing in 1969 really a hoax?" Professional photographers over the years have tried to prove that these "actual photographs/videos taken during the moon landing of the Apollo 11 on July 20, 1969 were false?"---- I guess what was really so confusing to many American people over the years, was the photos/videos taken during the Apollo 11 mission training VERSUS "the actual moon landing photos" showing these historical U.S. NASA astronauts doing their routine training work on the moon in a "Hollywood stage recorded setting", before their long landing mission and journey onto the moon which began in early 1969?
Many experts have claimed that this worldwide photographic television "Hoax" on July 20, 1969, regarding over 5 million viewers at this time in history, have tried to prove that the 1960's "U.S.A. space race" was better than the Soviet's at the time? Many photographic, political experts and even scientist over the years have stated that the U.S. was in a time of crisis regarding the Cold War and or "Space Race", they had to do something to keep up the American image and keep up the faith in the late 1960's?" because of the Vietnam War, which seemed to be getting out of hand and losing at the time.
"Americans at the time of 1969, needed something to believe in?" Did 1969 NASA officials improvise on this photographic situation? Was the Apollo 11 mission "actually" canceled in outer space flight because of technical problems and had to return to the earth? Thus, leaving the American people with an embarrassing loss on worldwide television and NASA television broadcasters "did in fact" continue their photographic/video images on July 20, 1969, which could have possibly been rehearsed and video recorded from the beginning on a stage setting, meaning that "if all else fails, we will continue broadcasting, and still show the American people we are winners of this space race with these recorded videos?"
Many leading expert scientist over these past 40 years have claimed that these "Moon Rocks" brought back from the original Apollo 11 mission have a similarity to earth's crust? Meaning that they have a very small amount of water content. "Expert" scientist have also stated that our moon, "actually came from the earth billions of years ago because of an asteroid impact that seemed to have water at the time?" However, remained with NO atmosphere, same as the earth, but only a "beautiful satellite" that revolves around our planet everyday in life. "These leading experts state that these moon rocks are authentic in every way"
Overall, 86% of American people still believe that this alleged U.S. man moon landing event on July 20, 1969 actually took place? And although, a lot of these "suspicious photographs" taken by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin during this incident still remain to be uncertain regarding the facts because of the lighting on the moon while these historical photographs were taken? (Especially the fact that there are NO stars in the background in certain photos?). But, unfortunately professional photographers have NO idea what it's like to take a photo while standing on the moons surface simply because of gravity and sunlight?
Leading expert scientist and photographers have argued over the past 40 years regarding the incident of these original "first man on the the moon" photos/videos originally taken by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin" whether or not this photographic image of them pushing the moons soil into space "Is actually real?" Because of the gravity of the moon? "Would this moon dust actually fall immediately to the ground or slowly?" Or was it because of faulty photographic reasons? Most Americans and worldwide television viewers watched this "so-called" historic event in black and white T.V. with very poor quality on July 20, 2009
Thanks for reading,
Phillip Chambley.
Published by Phillip W. Chambley
Author/website designer of "secretsofsurveys.com" of the original ebook called "Secrets of Paid Online Surveys Ebook." View profile
Book Review: Dark Side of the MoonWhat is the true cost of voyaging to the moon? Historian Gerard J. DeGroot makes an accounting in his new book "Dark Side of the Moon" and he doesn't like the bottom line.
Movie Sneak Preview: In the Shadow of the Moon Using archival footage and interviews with the surviving astronauts, this documentary examines the Apollo missions in which America shot for the Moon- The Economic Development of the MoonAndrew Smith, the author of Moondust: In Search of the Men Who Fell to Earth, recently published a polemic in the British newspaper The Guardian, entitled Plundering the Moon, that argued against the economic developm...
New Moon Deadly to Nighttime WalkersNighttime walkers are 22% more likely to be killed in traffic during a new moon than a full moon.
In the Shadow of the MoonIn the Shadow of the Moon is a celebration of the singular greatest technological feat in history. British director David Singleton scores a particular artistic coup by allowing...
- Apollo Moon Landings: Real or Hoax?
- Apollo 11 Moon Landing Hoax... Or Alien Base Cover-Up? Pick Your Conspiracy
- NASA Using Earth to Test Inflatable Space Station & Mars Trip
- One Small Step, 40 Years Later
- Phases of the Moon and Magic
- Once in a Blue Moon :May 2007
- Orion to the Moon




