Washington Post Columnist Insults America's Armed Forces
No Place Remains in Which Peaceful Men May Do What Peaceful Men Do
Some in our world would rather rip down the principals upon which society has been built in order to establish a mock peace. No peace exists anywhere if the principals of peace and that which characterizes it is not upheld and mightily defended everywhere.
When some think to do death, make war, or otherwise dismantle the fabric with which society has been established they must come to public scrutiny. A determination must be made as to whether or not they wish to serve a public good or a self devised agenda of their own for selfish reasons.
Such an occurrence has arisen at the Washington Post. A columnist at the Post has written and subsequently had published by the Post an article that discourages the people who know things other than what he knows and causes them distress in that theirs is a job of sacrifice and selflessness for little or no financial gain. For them to prevail they need from us impeccability with our word. We must support them to bring them home. They do not want to come home until the job is done and they cannot do the job if we do not support them. How would a writer like it if someone came in the middle of their work and disturbed them from completing their work? A warrior's work is no less valid because an argument can be imagined against the validity of that work.
William M. Arkin of the Post wrote that our "mercenary" military is a menace and all that they do is ill-conceived. There is no thing that I would ever do to silence Mr Arkin. I like for the selfish and self inflating elite to announce their ignorance and to trumpet their erred concoctions of reality. It often results in their own hate, anger and or fear emerging and exposing them for what they are. It is much like the US Presidential hopeful, the man J. Kerry when he made his senseless comment regarding our warriors being somehow less of a persons and less valued because they are in Iraq rather than in one of the schools that he feels they would be more valuable in "if they worked hard." Huh, man J. Kerry, you must have had a different experience in school. It was the easiest damned thing I ever did. And as for Mr Arkin, I don't know about being a mercenary, but the fact is a mercenary does his deed for money. I can assure you that electricians are making much more in Iraq than infantry Soldiers. Does that make electricians mercenaries? Mr Arkin, you are the mercenary. You trade the value of your word for money. Truly, Sir, that makes you despicable.
Truth is, they would be better off in school. We all know that, and even many of them know that too. They have chosen to spend some life serving and putting some of their blood and guts to the stone and to contribute a bit to that which has been sustained since the beginning by the blood, guts and lives of those willing to sacrifice. His undoing, like that of Mr Arkin and the likes of him is in how he believes that he somehow has a view that exceeds theirs. His view somehow enables him to use the fact that they have sacrificed schooling as a twist that he spun into an insult about their value. It does so satisfy me when the anti-crowd is revealed in their own word. Dissecting them can be one of the most satisfying endeavors I have known.
The public much did exactly that with Mr Arkin's rant opposing our Troops and their vesting in that which they have staked their lives. William Arkin did not let his words stand. He came back in and wrote more of the same but with pale apologies and softenings. He did not even have the courage to let people just simply hate his sentiments and cognitive deficiency. He explained and hemmed and hawed back and forth this way and that in practically a serial form of unrelenting efforts to explain himself and expound on his original reasonings.
Ultimately I wound up reading a coward and could not finish reading the rest of his table top banging about how and why he was right and further agitations about what he really meant. If he had to tell us what he "really" meant then he should not have written the article for public scrutiny. A third grader could read his chicken scratchings and even comprehend that he actually despises the military.
That leads me to wonder why he thinks his point of view is any more than just that. A point of view. I have read Hundreds od discertations from Soldiers as well as Marines in the field in Afghanistan as well as Iraq and some from a US Marine who actually knows Mahmoud Amahdinejad of Iran, and I can say with absolute certainty that without a shadow of doubt any American that thinks they are safe in this world without absolute and decisive action on the field in battle by us is a fool.
Now I will grant anyone that my statement above is an opinion. It is one in which I would stake my life, but it is an opinion. That brings me back to where it has come time for the peaceful Americans who love, life, apple pie, Fords and Chevrolets, Dodges and Hondas, Harleys and days at the beach tom stand together in a united scene and stand stoicly against those who think to harm, hate, murder and kill-ANYONE anywhere.
It must also be said that no American anywhere who is credible wants to do any harm unto anyone. I spent years in the military. No one "wanted" to do any harm. Our base philosophy was to be so well trained, so efficient and so capable that no one would think to challenge us. The tables have turned now. There is an enemy out there that does indeed think to challenge us. We must rise to and break that challenge. If we do not there will be an eternal price to be paid.
When I was stationed in Germany I was an observer to a German work crew who installed for crossing a river a mobile bridge. They worked so swiftly and with such pride and efficiency I have never forgotten it. I stood there with other US Military leaders and standing next to me was a German National. I acknowledged him and in my broken German congratulated his country through my acknowledgement of him for such a great crew and how well they trained. To my great advantage he spoke English as well as I did. His name was Hans. Hans and I stood there talking and in the course of that conversation I thanked him and his native Germany for hosting us, The American presence there, and Hans looked squarely at me with perhaps the most intense glance I have ever witnessed and he said to me words I have never forgotten.
"It is I who must thank you for coming here and affording us the influence of your presence. In America communism is but a philosophical doctrine. It is discussed and studied and it is academic cannon fodder. For us, here, in Germany, communism is in our very backyards and it is very real and it is a physical tangible threat. No, Sergeant, it is I who must thank you. "
I have never forgotten those words. For silly little brains with the actual information of teaspoons of content it can be said that stepping up to the plate is silly and fear driven. For me, the act of stepping up to the plate is courage and vision. It is looking at what is and seeing it for what it looks like, calling it that and then deciding upon and taking a decisive course of action.
Academics and muddle minds can question things all they like. That is a sign of the health of our free speech, but the truth is, free speech is earned on a battlefield and it comes not from peace but from brazen acts of heroism and self less acts of vision. We are in such a time right now, the world is threatened and there are plenty of things occurring that need to be addressed. That which our Soldiers, Marines, Airmen and Sailors are addressing is one of the many things which must be addressed and dealt with. To discount their investment in this state of world affairs is selfish and elitist and I can say nothing if I cannot say this, an elitist is merely a being who is about to fall if his elitism costs him the accurate vision of those over which he thinks he sees.
Published by Daniel Doyle
I'm 50 years old, and a ten year US Army Veteran. I have lived a life of love as well as tragedy and pain as well as joy. I am a self-employed electrician when I'm not playing. I play as much as possible. View profile
- The Washington Post Series Chronicling Stories of Black Men in 2006The Bill Cosby event was very well attended because of his notoriety. The second in this series was on February 8, 2007. The second Ebenezer event was entitled "Being a Black Man". This event was one that was quite...
- Washington D.C. AIDS Crisis Hurt by Mismanaged Nonprofit OrganizationsWashington D.C.'s HIV/AIDS epidemic affects large numbers of HIV patients, yet federal funds for social services for HIV patients are often lost because of corruption.
- Fox News False Ad of Washington Tea Party Coverage: Propaganda MachineFox News took out a full page false ad in the Washington Post Friday and showed themselves to be the propagandistic Right-wing props that most true journalists and objective observers have known them to be for quite s...
- Washington, D.C. Haunted Houses and Halloween EventsOur nation's capitol is a great place to celebrate any holiday, including Halloween. If you will be in or around Washington, DC this fall, here are some spooky events you shouldn't miss!
Washington, D.C., In the Movies: Mr. Smith Goes to Washington to Nationa...Washington, D.C. is a favorite spot for film makers and visitors. Take a look at some popular films set in D.C. before you visit; here are some suggestions.
- Washington Post Vs Webmoney Transfer
- Washington Post Reporter Roxanne Roberts ID'd the Salahis at Washington Soiree
- Washington Post Endorses Barack Obama and Other 10/17 Campaign Developments
- Former Washington Post Writer T.R. Reid Speaks at the University of Michigan-Dearborn
- The Lean Plate: Washington Post Health Reporter, Sally Squires, Weight Plan
- Aspiring Journalists Learn from Experts at The Washington Post
- The Washington Post: Excellent News Coverage
- William Arkin of Washington Post Calls US GI's "Mercenarys"


13 Comments
Post a CommentPaul, did you read all of Arkin's defensives and back padaling? That was the basis of my point. You know there are people here at AC who represent things I detest, at least they hold their ground, you never read Musall explain himself, you never read Sexton back-pedaling all over to try and explain his occasional bout with random brainfartage...Arkin was a textbook wimp after he got all puffy and chest-uppy-ness with the Post article. People like that need to be thumped. I thumped him. I don't care about his opinion, or his emotional posture or his platform built of emotion and personal erred sentiment...I was simply sickened by his back-padaling. That's what I was writing about here. You are a better word pedaler than him. I respect you more. You never back off, you will give a thought, you will do as a thinking man does, but your word is something you take responsibility for. Arkin was just a wimp. I'd love to have a round with him in public. Anyway...keep grins. Stay in the fight.
Daniel, I don't believe necessarily that those I served with were unprofessional--only that their reasons for being there had much more to do with personal neccessity or a some desire for stability or adventure, etc, rather than with platitudes and cliches about defending freedom. In fact, your portrayal of military people as this heroic class of folks serves to grow the divide in understanding between the military and civilians, thereby resulting in people thinking all they must do to support the troops is slap a magnet on their cars.
(He'd hate Hillary)...because that is a mean person. She'd nuke his ass...but that's another story.
Thank you for popping in, Paul. It sounds like the unit/military/branch you were in was different than mine. Every single person I served with was proffessional to the core. As for Kerry's latest "joke" blunder...I guess you would have to remember the sentiment and elitist fundamentals spread around during Vietnam in order to 'really know' whay kerry meant when he shot his mouth of about school and troops and so forth. And, Paul, there was not one thing supportive of 60'-70's era Troops that spewed from Kerry's mouth when he spoke of all their crimes...of which he later said he never really did commit, only others did. Kerry does what he does in order to build himself a platform from which he can stand and taunt his self-fulfilling case. If he ever represents the best we have to offer...I may learn to use "eh" after every point I make...or call people "senor". Right now, I just look for who Osama would like for US influence...then I oppose that person. He'd hate Hillary...because that
It is amazing to me that people like John Kerry, who has for the most part worked to further the well being of American servicemembers, is bashed by conservatives for disparaging the troops. Anyone with a brain could see that teh most recent attempt to bash Kerry was unfounded and that he was clearly attempting to joke on Bush. Also, his anti-war activitities following his 2 TIME VOLUNTEER SERVICE IN VIETNAM, was done in solidarity with the troops. Anyone who reads his speech before the Congress in 1973 would know that he was blaming the US governmnet for placing troops in a hellish situation, not blaming or betraying his brothers. Virtually every one of his boatmates attested to his brevery and leadership, yet a bunch of Swift Boat Liars get credibility. This whole thing makes me sick--criticize Kerry for many things, but not his service or dedication to troops.
One more thing for all you conservatives--how is it that you guys constantly talk about insults to the troops and not supporting the troops, but never point out how conservative Republicans and Dems in Congress constantly vote to the detriment of veterans interests? How about pointing out how those same conservatives vote in favor of massive spending for various weapons programs that only enrich weapons building corps, while defunding & underfunding the VA budget? Then these conservatives turn around and posture as if they are the ones "supporting the troops", while denoucning those who wish to remove them from harm and prevent the misuse and abuse of US servicemembers. Honestly, the conservative habit of hiding behind the troops is despicable.
and military legacies
I forgot to add college money to teh list of reasons for service.
The bottom line is that Soldiers, Marines etc, do not decide where and when they will fight, so supporting them and the wars they are sent to fight are indeed two seperate things. I think in order to fix the disconnect there should be some sort of mandatory service for all.
Daniel--I would guess based upon those I've worked with and encountered in the military, that a minority, maybe less than 25% are there to protect and defend. Most are primarily concerned with the steady paycheck,or the benefits, or the adventure adventure, the women, or simply because they haev nothing else to do. Whehn they are called to action, they are simply doing their assigned job, following orders and hoping to get home safely. Therefore, the American military is indeed made up of mercenary-type idividuals. I read Arkin's piece and it seems the only real point he was making is that the whole concept of "supporting the troops" has become so distorted that a giant disconnect has occured between the troops and the American public, and I totally agree. Politicians (Republicans)have simply used this "support the troops bullshit to shield themselves and their decisions from scrutiny.