The answer is: When they come to town, it's probably best to leave. Jessica's arrival can be deadly; Cantore's always involves a bad storm; and Gore's almost always means an end to local or regional "global warming."
Yes, Al Gore has a history of showing up to speak or being involved in a major climate change event and the weather just doesn't cooperate. Instead of excessive warmth, really cold weather and/or a snowstorm occurs. This is affectionately known as the "Gore Effect."
And, the inconvenient truth (pun intended) is that it seems to happen summer or winter.
Let's consider a few cases that make the point...
In Australia, in November 2006, Al Gore visited two weeks before Southern Hemisphere summer began and the Gore Effect struck. According to online reports attributed to The Age (http;//www.theage.com.au), "Ski resort operators gazed at the snow in amazement. Parents took children out of school and headed for the mountains. Cricketers scurried amid bullets of hail as Melburnians traded lunchtime tales of the incredible cold."
Gore spoke in New Zealand prior to going to Australia. Yes, it snowed there, as well.
On another speaking tour, according to the New York Environment News, Gore chose January 15, 2004, one of the coldest days in New York City's history, to rail against the Bush administration and global warming skeptics. Gore told a startled audience, that global warming was causing record cold temperatures.
In March 2007, a snowstorm led to the cancellation of a Capitol Hill media briefing on a Senate climate bill.
And on October 22, 2007 Gore's global warming speech at Harvard University coincided with near 125-year record-breaking low temperatures. Less than a week later, on October 28, the British House of Commons held a marathon debate on global warming during London's first October snowfall since 1922.
Sometimes the Gore Effect isn't instantaneous, but takes place over time as described here. Toronto's snow drought in 2006 was transformed into the snowiest winter in 125 years during 2008.
In late January 2009, Gore was slated to testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (Washington, DC) on the "urgent need" to combat global warming. The hearing was almost postponed due to a snowstorm.
About 5 weeks later (March 2, 2009), the Capitol Climate Action (CCA) Protest made a comparable bad choice concerning the date of its planned protest march. The protest, slated to be the largest mass civil disobedience event in support of controlling climate was upstaged by a daylong heavy snow event. Five inches of snow fell in Washington, DC, while winds gusting to about 35 mph made the 20-degree temperatures feel quite a bit colder. The CCA had to choose between following through on the protest (which it did) or to cancel it because of the snowstorm. The humor was not lost on the media. FoxNews.com noted that it was "snowing irony in Washington."
Well, it's now time for the United Nations Climate Change Conference that began in Copenhagen, Denmark on December 7, 2009 (which I have declared as a Day of Environmental Infamy). And the Gore Effect strikes yet again.
Since December 6th, temperatures across the United States have plummeted well into the deep freeze and snow already covers more than 50% of the Nation. In fact, almost the entire U.S. was below to far below average in both the maximum and minimum temperature departments. In some places, the departure was as much as 15 to 20 degrees below average. While there were a few areas on a few days with above average readings, these literally evaporated by December 10.
So, let's first look briefly at the temperature departures across the U.S. for the first half of the Copenhagen Conference (courtesy of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center).
With the exception of a brief one day on December 9, 2009 (reds and tans), the chill (blues) dominates almost the entire country for almost the entire period.
And another arctic outbreak is enroute as next week unfolds.
The Gore Effect is really pretty dramatic and pretty ironic when you think about it. And to think, we used to think that global warming was caused by all that hot air originating in Washington, DC.
Published by H. Michael Mogil
I'm a meteorologist by education, a math tutor (and educational advocate) by chance, and a writer (including science, travel, home improvement and consumerism) by choice. Once upon a time I couldn't write w... View profile
- Thinking Out Loud - Climate Change or Bupkus?Climate Change is being fomented as an issue by people who benefit the most from it. But what does it mean to the rest of us? A look at fact versus fiction.
- Climate ChangeThis is about climate change and the effects of it which we have started to experience.
Climate Change Throughout Modern TimesToday we hear the term "global warming" everywhere. Yet we've had periods in relatively recent history when the climate was much warmer than it is today.- Cold Weather Tips for PetsCold temperatures and various products, like antifreeze and ice melt, used during cold weather, put dogs and cats at a high risk of being harmed. But by following these important measures, you can be sure your pet is...
- Climate Group Appeals to Heads of State to Reach Consensus on Climate Change Policy"Over the course of the next few days, world leaders have a unique opportunity to make decisions and secure commitments that will help put the world on track towards a low-carbon economy."
- Classical Musicians Daniel Barenboim, Barbara Hendricks and Christian Benda Join K...
- Climate Change Conspiracy Against the African Child
- Problems Caused by Global Climate Change and Finding a New Approach
- It's Rabbit Season...No, It's Duck Season...No, It's Global Warming Season
- Reasons for Skepticism About Global Warming and Climate Change
- Climate Change and Its Effects on the Poor and Disadvantaged Groups
- Global Warming/Climate Change Not Just for Democrats Anymore





2 Comments
Post a CommentNolan -- I couldn't agree more. Daily weather changes of themselves are NOT the key, but collectively (over thousands of years) they are. But the proponents of human-caused climate change keep replying on "hottest in 100 years" or similar comments. So, I'm coming back with a similar framework (but in an ironic manner).
As for "rate of change," that is based on limited data and data that is tinged with problems in siting instruments.
I appreciate your comments and hope you'll keep up with my other climate change articles. I'll present supportive or opposition information to anthropogenic climate change as I uncover it. I'm out, after all, for truth, not political or social agendas.
Do not confuse weather with climate. Citing weather phenomena on a given day in any place has no bearing on climatic conditions. As climate change occurs, some places will become warmer and drier, others will become cooler and wetter. The RATE of change is what man is affecting, and that is where all the deniers fall short.