What Do the Climate Research Unit E-mails and Documents Reveal?

After nearly a week of having obtained the e-mails and documents from the Climatic Research Unit of East Anglia, and after they were deemed as authentic even by the same scientists who wrote them, it is
worth to look into what they say.

It is worth saying that one of the media that first obtained and authenticated documents was The New York Times, which has ratified the assertions contained therein from the mouth of the scientists themselves, but at the same time, described the discovery as one of little importance. In other media, they have been read, analyzed and deciphered in order to make them public knowledge.

Let's start with the ''science'' which according to the alarmists has been so emphatically clear in favor of anthropogenic global warming. What is it that these ´´scientists´´ say behind the scenes on the apparent consensus? Kevin Tindberth, a climatologist at the Center for Atmospheric Research said: ''the fact is we can not say why there is a lack of warming today, or because it has fallen, and that's a problem for us.''

Meanwhile, Phil Jones, head of the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia said: ''I have recently completed the trick that Mike created to the model temperatures to hide the fact that they have declined over the last few years. " Jones DESCRIBES a ''trick'' used in scientific peer-reviewed publications by the scientific community in an effort to hide the decline in temperatures, which dates back to the 60s.

The farce does not end there. What happened when the scientific literature includes articles that Jones did not want to make public? ''We can´t let these documents appear in the report of the IPCC. Kevin and I will keep them out even if we have to redefine the meaning of the scientific review process.''

This information should shake us so next time you listen to the 'talk about the scientific consensus, and when Al Gore tells us that the scientific reviews of climate models are the holy word.

What happens to the documents reviewed by scientists if they do not satisfy their thirst? ''Our only option is to ignore these documents, the questoners have already achieved their objective,'' says Michael Mann, the scientist who invented the famous ´´hockey stick´´ graph which distorts the relationship between CO2 emissions and global warming and that Al Gore had to withdraw from his documentary ''An Inconvenient Truth.

In addition there is the revelation that the same scientific information not only hid the decline in temperatures, but also erased data which jeopardized their intentions. In one e-mail, Phil Jones tells Mike Mann: ''Can you delete all e-mails you exchanged with Keith RE AR4. Keith will do the same. He's not in his office now because he is having a small family crisis.'' Jones continued: ''Can you also tell Gene to do the same? I do not have his new e-mail. Caspar will tell you to do the same.''

Why are they so secretive? Well, let's look at what they said about another fellow scientist (Steve McIntyre), who argued against the idea of anthropogenic global warming: ''I'm sure you've noticed that McIntyre knows that he doesn´t need to publish his data on important media. All you have to do is post it on his blog, and his followers will start talking about it. In other words, these ''scientists'' prostituted and continue prostituting the most important pillar of the scientific method: having a theory, researching , showing evidence and providing a conclusion, and at the same time, they want to circumvent the innate right we all have to question and debate an issue as important as global warming.

The point is that if McIntyre could see the data, he would find that there was interference in the climate models to replace and hide information. Then people like him -crazy people- could inform the public about the nonsense that these liars used to alter the truth about the real warming and cooling trends of the atmosphere.

Incredibly, the New York Times decided not to publish the original documents because ''they contain information that is not to be disclosed to the public.'' Of course not! Billions of dollars are allocated to projects that revolve around the farce of anthropogenic global warming, but it is not good to reveal the lies that the ''scientists'' tell the public. Of course not! It is based on a lie that the globalists intend to tax the world to finance their New World Order through the cap and trade scheme, which is the very same program Al Gore has made millions of. What if people realize it's all a hoax?

Sources include:

Forget The Emails, Code Discusses "Artificially Adjusted" Temperatures.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/forget-the-emails-code-discusses-artificially-adjusted-temperatures.html

Dr. Tim Ball interviewed about the farse of Man-made Global Warming
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac&feature=player_embedded

Climategate: The Final Nail in the coffin of Anthropogenic Global Warming
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/

BBC Climate Correspondent Was Forwarded CRU Emails Five Weeks Before They Were Made Public
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-climate-correspondent-was-forwarded-cru-emails-five-weeks-before-they-were-made-public.html

Other Materials • American Spectator: "Climate Gate" Development: CEI Files Notice of Intent to Sue NASA
• UK Register: Treemometers: A New Scientific Scandal. If a Peer Review Fails in the Woods...
• Nature.com: Storm Clouds Gather Over Leaked Climate e-mails
• Newsbusters.org: ClimateGate Totally Ignored By TV News Outlets Except Fox
• Washington Times: Hiding Evidence of Global Cooling
• UK Telegraph: Climategate: the Final Nail in the Coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'?
• PowerLine: Global Warming Bombshell
• Wall Street Journal: Global Warming With the Lid Off
• Alleged CRU Emails - Searchable
• American Thinker: Violating the Principle of Science as 'Social Contract'
• Sweetness & Light: Emails Damning To CRU Head, Phil Jones
• Sweetness & Light: Proof That 'Climate Skeptics' Are Right
• Sweetness & Light: Post Your Favorite CRU Email/Docs Here
• IBD Greensheet: Download The Entire Leaked Climate Emails -Joe Weisenthal
• Heritage Foundation: ClimateGate Heats Up Global Warming Debate Before Copenhagen