You're probably familiar with the idea of television "ratings". Ratings are a measurement of how many people are watching or listening to a particular program. They also specify what particular demographic are tuning in. Primarily, it is the Nielsen Rating system that networks and advertisers use to determine what's hot and what's not. But do you know specifically how the Nielsen's work? Once you hear this, you'll realize what a flawed system it is and it may upset you to know some of your favorite shows have been cancelled because of this defective marketing tool.
The Nielsen Ratings are calculated two ways. One is by the use of "Nielsen Boxes" that track the viewing habits of "Nielsen Families". These families are households that have a special machine hooked up to the backs of their televisions, tracking which programs are being watched. It can also tell at which point a specific program was turned off or changed to another channel. For example, a network can discover that halfway through one hour-long drama, many Americans are switching over to a sitcom for the last thirty minutes. This may prompt the network to change the scheduling of the drama.
The other way Nielsen Ratings are tallied is by the use of surveys. People are asked to keep a daily diary of the shows they are watching. This is the most extensive method used for Nielsen's research, as it is much less expensive than installing computers on the backs of televisions. Ever heard of "sweeps week"? You know, that time of year that all the really exciting episodes of your shows come on and they bust out the big name guest stars? Those are the weeks when the Nielsen diaries are being processed. The Nielsen people start with the diaries on the East Coast and "sweep" up the diaries across the nation.
So, that is how they collect their data. Some of you may be a Nielsen Family, but most likely you aren't. That is why each Nielsen Family must represent a very large portion of America: because the networks simply can't know what every person is watching. There in lies one of the many flaws of this system. A minority of the country are determining what is considered a hit and what will inevitably be cancelled. Doesn't seem hardly accurate or fair, does it?
There are many people who find this system flawed and inaccurate. For instance, take the whole "Nielsen Diary" program. Who's to say these people are being honest? Who's to say some seventeen year-old kid isn't going to log that he watched "The O.C." this week with ten of his buddies? It might be that kid's fault a critically acclaimed, excellent program playing at the same time as "The O.C." gets cancelled. And since the advent of digital television recorders, many people aren't even watching their favorite programs until later, at a more convenient time. (Nielsen boxes don't register things being Tivo'd!)
Ask yourself: how many Nielsen Families do you personally know? Well, according to Nielsen, you probably know plenty but they just haven't told you because they're sworn to secrecy. Right. Sure. Your closest friends in the world are really keeping this from you because it's such a state secret. No, you probably don't know a Nielsen Family. For all we know, the system is not only inaccurate, but it is rigged as well. The next time your favorite program gets cancelled, you'll now know why.
Published by Dinah Laurel
Dinah Laurel is a freelance writer who specializes in online content development. View profile
- Why Boomer Sally Field Should Win an Emmy for Brothers & Sisters RoleThis could be the "Year of the Boomer." If this is true, then Sally Field, as a lead runner of the generation born 1946-1964, should win the Emmy for Outstanding Lead Actress for a Drama Series for her role as matriar...
Effectively Advertising & Promoting Your BusinessIf you are in business on the Internet or in the real world you need to advertise and promote your business. Most small and medium size businesses don't understand the importan...- Television RatingsThere will be new ways to find out which TV programs are the most popular. This will be done by finding out which programs are popular inside the home as well as outside of the home such as offices and other groups.
- How Cable Home Shows Give Home Buyers the Wrong Tips on What to Look ForCable TV home shows give buyers the wrong impression of what to look out for when buying a house. Here are some tips on how to be realistic when purchasing a home
- Bravo Announces New Night of Reality ShowsThe Bravo television network announced Wednesday that its plans for the upcoming year include a new night of all original reality-based programming. The new season includes a trio of shows about luxury living, and a...
- The Problems with Honey, We're Killing Our Kids
- Good Television Shows that Were Cancelled Too Soon
- Figure Skating 101: A Fan's Guide to This Olympic Sport
- Deal or No Deal - March 20, 2006
- Nielsen Ratings' Accuracy a Fairytale
- Why I'm Throwing Off the Nielsen Ratings
- Steroids and Competition in America: A Symptom of a Far Larger Problem
- Ratings are a measurement of how many people are watching or listening to a particular program.
- The Nielsen Ratings are calculated two ways.
- Some of you may be a Nielsen Family, but most likely you aren�t.




4 Comments
Post a Commenthey Rick Starr, who cares what you think or D Mills thinks either! I don't care if my cable box is a "Big Brother" device, WHO CARES, we just want the CORRECT INFO not some ESTIMATED GARBAGE. Nielsen is a joke, get Time Warner, Comcast and everyone else to start monitoring what we watch, I could care less and most others would care less also, it's only those paying for porn who think they have some invasion of privacy - YES I DO WANT A BIG BROTHER BOX, IT WOULD BE MORE ACCURATE than the CBS Nielsen box! Some of the best shows on TV have been canceled because of this crap estimating rating system. Rick Starr and D Mills you are APOLOGISTS for a GARBAGE system that does more harm than good for American television. How pathetic is it that we still don't have an accurate ratings system? Maybe if we did CBS would no longer be #1 since that's all Nielsen idiots watch.
The author is correct. For instance, I live in a town of 45,000 that doesn't have access to the big four networks. We have RTV, Ion and America One. That's it. There isn't a single Nielsen family in the entire town! The local channels have asked Nielsen to give them data on ratings to gage their prices for ads. Nielsen doesn't care and ignores their requests.
Furthermore, case in point that the Nielsen data is 100% bullshit: Married with Children. This show was watched by EVERYBODY on Sunday nights. Instead, the Nielsen data always reported Murder She Wrote. NOBODY watched that show once Married with Children was aired. The proof is everybody at work was always talking about Al Bundy. I mean EVERYBODY! NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY, was talking about Jessica Fletcher!
That's one example of many!
The article reads like a primer of someone who doesn't know anything about ratings. Nielsen uses a combination of devices which attach to the TV and which record actual viewing (DVR's included) and written diaries. Arbitron has a "people meter" which records actual listening, and uses diaries as well.
There are weaknesses in both approaches, but the science of "sampling" is well understood, and the fact that "you don't know anyone being polled" is laughable. Political polls, which measure things prior to elections - and then have *actual results* days later are usually within a "margin of error", and it's rare that they are wildly wrong. (And in those unusual cases where they are, there's generally an explainable reason.)
Surveys are about the only way to determine what *most* people watch, unless you want to have a "big brother" box attached to every TV set in the land, reporting back on what you're doing each minute of the day.
This article is misleading because the author has her facts wrong. If you are a Nielsen family the meters they install are attached to every television, VCR, TIVo and DVR in your home. It is a requirement that they cover every device that has a tuner. I notice that the author doesn't offer a constructive option for the sampling methodology which of course is used for all sorts of political polls, etc.