My first reaction is anger; I want to beat the person doing the calling over the head until they slide down bleeding into the street. My next reaction is stupefaction; I wonder how in the heck someone who spends almost every waking minute discussing and researching the Constitution could possibly be a "liberal." My last reaction is to go about figuring out what a "liberal" really is, and is it really a bad thing.
When in doubt check the etymology and English language definition, this is my mantra and it honestly serves quite well. Merriam Webster states that Liberal can be defined as the following, "of or befitting a man of free birth; marked by generosity; lacking moral restraint; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms..." (Liberal, 2009) I know that while my moral compass may be different from many others it is not lacking in restraint, so that portion does not apply. I was born free in the United States of America so that definition does apply. I am not bound by orthodoxy (religion) or do authoritarianism and traditional forms bind me so this portion also applies. Am I generous, yes and no, as a staunch objectivist I tend to be generous only with those that are deserving, i.e. directly related or with whom I know will not necessarily squander my generosity. This means that in some cases I am generous, so this definition does apply. According to the dictionary than I am a "liberal."
So far, according to the dictionary definitions I am quite happy to be called a "liberal." In fact, I should thank the people who have used this term derisively against me. We found that a dictionary defined liberal is born free and does good things. My problem is that the people who use the word "liberal" derisively do so out of ignorance and through a sense of superiority because they are following the morally superior path (in their own minds.)
So let us look to the history of this word, otherwise known as etymology. For one to look to the history of a word it is important to know where its foundations lie, with most of the English language it is Latin in base, however, as with most of the American/ English language we find that other languages seep in. After all, we Americans are not very original really, that however, remains to be discussed.
Liberal is an adjective, it is a descriptive and a modifier not a noun. With this alone it is improper to use it how many do today, as a noun or worse a pronoun. Liberal describes what a person is not who that person is. On to the history: The Old French "Liberal circa 1375," reads as follows, "befitting free men, noble, generous." I like this, after all, I tend to think of myself as a free man, and I would like to be seen as noble. It was also taken from the Latin liberalis meaning "noble, generous" literally "pertaining to a free man," Even the Greek and others show this as the definition. When applied politically the history dates from 1801, utilizing the French "liberal," meaning, "tending in favor of freedom and democracy," Interesting yes.
So now, we see that the word that is slung at people with such viciousness at times should be worn proudly. Of course, on the opposite side we must also see that those who wear it so proudly are not always so very "noble" or worse seekers of true democracy. How can one pursue socialism and call them selves "liberal." Our founding fathers were very proudly "liberal" yes; many of them embraced the word to its fullest. In addition, to this day while I have at times bristled at the use pertaining myself I am proud to be "liberal"
Published by Jesse Mathewson
As an individual who believes in Liberty, Non-Aggression, Self-Defense, Self-Ownership and a Free Market without state interference it is my firm belief that we should all be better students in life. With my... View profile
Our Founding Fathers Were Not DeistsDavid Barton is an author and historian who has extensively studied the beliefs of our Founding Fathers. He says that anyone who believes the Founders were deists is mistaken a...- Paul Lussier's Attack on the Founding FathersHistorical author Paul Lussier takes a hatchet to the Founding Fathers. Is his view accurate?
- Achievements of the Founding Fathers of the United Statesachievements and accomplishments of the Founding Fathers of the United States
- The Advantages & Disadvantages of the Birth Control PillI have been debating about taking birth control pills. I decided to help my decision I would do some research on the birth control pill and weigh both the advantages and disadvantage of the pill.
- The Virtue of Curiosity: Mystery Cults and Enlightenment in Apuleius' "Golden Ass"The process of initiation into the mystery cults of the Mediterranean is discussed in the context of Apuleius' novel "The Golden Ass"
- Road Blocks Faced by America's Founding Fathers
- Why the Original Intent of the Founding Fathers when Framing the Constitution is I...
- John Adams is One of the Forgotten Founding Fathers, but Why?
- Advice from the Founding Fathers - Part 1
- The Constitution and the Founding Fathers Limerick
- What Did America's Founding Fathers Believe?
- Americans Weigh in on the Constitution, American Politics, and Founding Fathers




6 Comments
Post a CommentDiscovered you through Sheryl Young--a conservative I like. Liberal became a dirty word when the Ann Coulters of the world started demonizing those on the left. I am definitely "liberal," but to me it is just a label. My views are my views and they don't always coincide exactly with those attributed to liberals.
Intelligent and thought provoking. We should all be awarte of the labels we use.
Who knows where we got these labels like liberal and conservative? They haven't always meant the same thing. But for some purposes, it sure beats writing out the definitions in full! LOL.
This is why, whenever I MUST categorize (or distill) my personal philosophy for the benefit of others, I tend to say I am socially liberal but fiscally conservative, which I guess is what makes me a Libertarian (of sorts). Like you said, however, many folks calling themselves "Liberals" nowadays seem to want to put more chains on everyone than even the "evil" conservatives desire to. I guess, by Webster's definition, I could be called Liberal on several levels, but unfortunately, the word has taken on a whole new meaning, having been usurped by those who want bigger, more invasive (and more costly) government, speech codes (political correctness), and the redistribution of wealth (sacrificing the rights of the individual for the "good" of the state). That's not freedom by ANY definition!
I am born free and doing good. Thank you for this post.
Great work!