What No on Prop 8 Means to Me

Sabrina Ricci
I remember the day the California Supreme Court decided to lift the ban on gay marriage. It was a warm evening in Santa Barbara, and I was standing on the steps of the Courthouse, overlooking the wide green lawns into the sunset, photographing the smiles and tears of the over 100 people who had gathered to commemorate this victory on the path toward equality. May 15, 2008 was a day of hope and celebration.

A lesbian couple sat on the grass as they listened to the mayor's speech, one woman grinning and squeezing her significant other's hand, who was hugging their son in her lap. I remember thinking, "what a happy family."

Fast-forward a little more than five months and optimism about gay rights was replaced by protests, rallies, and marches led by students, citizens, and friends who were angry and hurt by the passing of Prop 8.

May 2009, I found myself at Storke Plaza on the UC Santa Barbara campus waving and cheering at all the couples symbolically getting married at the 19th annual Queer Wedding. It was a three-hour long mass wedding, presided over by the Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs, with the purpose of showing that everyone should have the right to get married. Hundreds of students walked down the aisle, some carrying roses, some carrying each other, all of them showing their support.

And now yesterday, Aug. 4, will be known as the day that restored hope for human rights. Sure, a lot more steps must be taken before gay marriage becomes permanently legal in California, and with any luck, in the U.S. But, I now know there is a chance for true liberty and justice for all in this country.

Civil rights, women's rights, gay rights-it affects me. I was brought up Catholic, I went to Catholic school for 12 years, but I still don't understand why people discriminate against homosexuals. In school I was taught to love and respect everyone, so why should it change if someone is gay?

Bradford Hogge, a good friend and homosexual hailing from Simi Valley, CA, said that gay marriage seems like it should be a simple issue, but because of so much funding from conservatives, it may be an infinite battle. At age 21, Brad told me that although he does not want to actually get married yet, he does want the ability to marry.

To him, marriage is not always so cut and dry. Some people are more bisexual, and right now, homosexual men can marry women and father children, but they cannot marry and have a family with people they're actually attracted to and could love, he said.

"I feel like [marriage] is so much more complicated that to tell someone that marriage is exclusive to people it's not entirely exclusive to [...] is ridiculous," he said. "We can't have such strict limitations that only allow heterosexuals to be married. That doesn't stop homosexuality and that doesn't stop the complexity of marriage. It doesn't make sense."

Because of Prop 8, Brad is only cautiously optimistic about Judge Walker's ruling. And I don't blame him. We always seem to take baby steps when it comes to change; I guess not everyone took Obama's campaign slogan so seriously.

Published by Sabrina Ricci

Sabrina Ricci is a freelance writer and current grad student at New York University. She has worked and written for a variety of publications, including Noozhawk, Santa Barbara Magazine, and Examiner.com. Sh...  View profile

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Michael Tennant8/20/2010

    ...suffer.
    On Nov. 4 2008 the people of California spoke, and we who believe that marriage is important will not stand by idle despite any decision that is made, especially that which is done my a lone radical judge. The same passion that makes doctor assisted suicide, freedom of religion, and abortion (even after 37 years) such hotly debated issues to this day are why we will stand by our morals and convictions, and never compromise. History has given testament otherwise to those who passively throw their hands in the air with issues such as communism, unfair labor laws, prostitution, abortion and homosexual unions. I encourage everyone to investigate their own beliefs, never ignore your doubts and always ask questions. Careful consideration is always the path we should be taking for making law, not just “rational” feelings.
    *This post is not intended to be vindictive. All are free to choose how they respond.

  • Michael Tennant8/20/2010

    In the tone of your article Sabrina, I think it fair for me to respond to a few of your statements and to a couple comments already left here. Take careful note of the language I use.
    We who have always understood marriage as only between a man and a woman stand against redefining marriage for many reasons. Our cause in this particular situation is defending the definition of marriage itself, not discrimination against the persons themselves who choose to identify themselves as homosexuals or those who practice homosexual behavior. We believe traditional marriage that western society has known for thousands of years is very foundational to a healthy society and that marriage itself is a very sacred union. We believe that the when the monogamous relationship is honored and held up by the state, that that society will prosper for greater good of all its members. And when the monogamous pledge of a man and wife is taken for granted and easily cast aside, that that society will surely

  • Jimmy Collins8/8/2010

    Good work!

  • Jeff Palmer8/5/2010

    Those who oppose same gender marriage are the same intolerant, ignorant and unenlightened people that listen to talk radio, watch Fox News and drag the nation down with their endlessly negative world view. Dismiss your Republican friends from your life and shun their asinine Party and politicians. You'll be glad you did every single day.

  • Peter Flom8/5/2010

    Right on.

  • Jennifer Amlie8/5/2010

    Great piece. i feel the same way as you, gay marriage should be legal and I can't think of one real reason why it shouldn't be.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.