Space Junk Means Space Bullets
The term space junk may seem innocuous enough, but, in reality, each bit of space junk might be more accurately called a space bullet. These space bullets fly around and around the Earth at speeds ranging from 6,500 miles per hour to over 17,000 miles per hour. Compare that to actual bullets that generally travel at less than 700 miles per hour.
U.S. Space Surveillance Network
According to NASA , there are over 19,000 manmade objects bigger than 10 centimeters in diameter whizzing around and around the Earth at various heights. Objects of this size are tracked by the U.S. Space Surveillance Network so that things like Space Shuttles can maneuver out of the way should a piece of space debris be headed toward them. You can see a graphical representation of all orbiting manmade objects larger than 10 cm in diameter here.
Too Much Space Junk to Count
In addition to the 19,000 tracked large objects, NASA estimates that there are half a million bits of space junk between 1 and 10 centimeters in size also orbiting the Earth. Once we start talking about objects smaller than 1 centimeter in diameter, the number jumps to tens of millions.
The Danger of Space Debris
The danger posed by space debris is more than just theoretical. In 2009, an active U.S. Iridium satellite was hit and completely destroyed by an old Russian Cosmos satellite that was no longer in operation. Of course, this high speed collision shattered both satellites creating thousands more smaller bit of space debris.
Decaying Orbits
Most space debris rings the Earth in decaying orbits. A decaying orbit is one in which the object gradually loses altitude as it circles the globe. Depending upon the height of the object's orbit, it can last for as little as a few years to more than 100 years. Eventually, objects with decaying orbits will re-enter the Earth's atmosphere. Once an orbiting object enters the atmosphere friction slows it even more quickly.
Space Junk Risk to Objects on Earth
These objects will either burn up from the heat of this atmospheric friction or it will fall to the Earth. NASA says that an average of one piece of catalogued space debris falls back to Earth each day. Usually, these go unnoticed, either burning up or falling into the oceans or in unpopulated areas. The risk of any person or building on Earth being hit by a falling piece of manmade space debris is miniscule.
Space Debris Risk to ISS and Other Objects
Structures like the International Space Station (ISS) generally use shielding to protect critical areas from damage caused by the impact of small space debris. NASA says the ISS shielding can withstand impacts from space debris up to 1 centimeter in diameter. Other objects may have attitudinal rockets which allow them to maneuver in orbit. These smaller objects can usually move out of the path of any known approaching pieces of space debris, while their fuel lasts. Maneuverable vehicles like the space shuttle routinely dodge such space bullets if there's even a chance that the object will come close. Other satellites may not have the ability to maneuver and must simply take their chances.
Governments Acknowledge Growing Space Junk Risk
Most space-faring countries and the United Nations recognize the danger of space debris and have adopted policies that attempt to lower the rate of creation of new pieces of space debris. Any new man-made object that goes into orbit, however, will be accompanied by some bit of debris that increases the risk to existing satellites.
Although the vast majority of space debris is man-made, there is also some risk posed by natural meteors. Small bits of dist or rocks fly through the solar system by the billions. Although only a small portion intersect the Earth's orbit, it is possible, though relatively rare, for these small, naturally occurring objects to seriously damage satellites as well. The increasing use of Earth's orbital space for satellites and research stations like the ISS, mean that the amount of man-made space debris and the risk of colliding with it, will continue to increase over time.
End of Life Space Junk Mitigation Plans for Satellites
Cognizant of the risk to their own future satellites, many communications companies with satellites in orbit, plan for the end of life of their satellites. As a satellite approaches the end of its usefulness, some companies will activate onboard maneuvering systems to nudge the satellite out of its old orbit into a higher one. These higher orbits help get the old satellite out of the area used by most active satellites and mean that it will take decades longer for the defunct satellite to fall to Earth. While this is helpful, even these modified orbits will eventually decay dropping these old satellites back into lower orbits and eventually into the Earth's atmosphere.
Follow Space_Matters on Facebook, or @space_matters on Twitter.
Published by Brad Sylvester
Professional writer specializing in space news and all topics related to outer space. View profile
- How Not to Deal with China as a Space PowerJeffrey Manber recently published a piece in the LA Times advocating closer cooperation with China in space. He does so without actually explaining adequately why this would be a benefit to the United States.
- Russian Rocket Explodes in Space Last Week, Adds Further Danger to Planned Shuttle...NASA and other agencies are beginning to think about the problem of "space junk," as the threat to missions and experiments grows. Two recent events added significantly to that concern.
- Problems Arise with Space StationThe space station is operated mostly by US and Russian space agencies. The Russian computers that control the space station's orientation, and oxygen and water supply have failed.
- Calling Earth 2 - Scientists Discover Earth-like Planet in Outer SpaceAn earth like planet has been found, but our space junk may have trapped us in this one.
- Solar Power from Space May Be an Overdue Answer to U.S. Energy CrisisIt might seem odd to have space-based solar power suddenly come to possible fruition when it's been studied and workable for the last 40 years. But once PG&E makes it a reality by 2016, expect big business to be the s...
- Should We Be Worrying About Space Junk?
- The Growing Problem of Space Debris
- Space Junk - Is There a Solution?
- Austin Fireball Ruled Out as Space Debris; So is it a UFO?
- Endeavor STS-130 - Details of the Final Five Space Shuttle Missions
- NASA Mission, International Space Station Troubled with Space Debris
- Crash Debris from Satellite Collision Between Iridium Satellite and Malfunctioning...
- Even the slowest space junk travels about ten times faster than a bullet.
- The U.S. Space Tracking Network follows more than 19,000 pieces of large space junk
- The International Space Station carries shielding to help protect itself from space junk.





3 Comments
Post a CommentCharles, Thank you for your comments and clarifying that although NASA explicitly says that objects above 10 cm in diameter are tracked to predict and avoid collisions, they may pass in and out of radar tracking ranges as they are monitored, I have made that correction. As for approach speeds, I did not make any statements on this topic. I stated only the speeds of individual objects. The relative impact speed between two objects obviously depends upon the individual speeds and angle of impact between them. The impact speed of the collision between the CERISE communications satellite and a loose fragment of an Ariane rocket on July 24, 1996, for example, was 31,500 miles per hour because they were traveling in opposite or near-opposite directions.
Brad - nice effort. This is another example of the failure of the Yahoo fact checkers (do they have any?). As a guy who spent years tracking satellites in the US Space Surveillance Network - your statement that the objects in space are continually tracked, and that the orbits are highly predictable, is wrong. Only a fraction of the objects are large enough and in high enough orbits that they are highly predictable. Most are tracked only intermittently - their orbits take them far from available radar trackers.
You also mis-state the approach speeds - if both objects are traveling at 17k mph, but are in the same orbit, they might have a very gentle nudge. You should correct your story to emphasis that a collision will cause damage if the two objects are in crossing orbits.
I am trying to be respectful but there is a lot of mis-information in Yahoo.
Will there a be a future job for space garbage collectors?