What is Up with These Presidential Czars's?

Tom Treloar
When I read or hear the word czar I think of king or ruler. It reminds me of the Russian czars in the early 1900's who were cruel, oppressive and not liked by the population. Their actions led to revolution and overthrow of the reign of czars. All my thoughts are negative when I think of czar. Now our government has thirteen or more czars overseeing many parts of American life and business. There is a car, technology, energy, healthcare, housing, mortgage and other czars that total to thirteen or more. Now a pay czar is being considered.

In the presidential cabinet there are only fifteen members. It appears that soon the president will have more czars than cabinet members. Cabinet members must be approved by Congress before they can advise the president. Czars are just appointed by the president with no approval necessary by the Congress. In my opinion it appears that the president is bypassing Congress and the Constitution.

I made a Google search and used the new Bing search on presidential czars. I got very little information. I want to know what do these czars get paid and are they paid with taxpayer's money? Another burning question is, how much power do these presidential appointed czars have? With fifteen cabinet members why are all these czars necessary?

What really bothers me is the lack of approval by Congress. Where is the checks and balance in the czar framework? I thought a president was elected, not a king. Tom Daschle was recommended for Human Services secretary. During his Senate approval his tax problem surfaced and was forced to bow out. If he had been appointed to the health czar post he would be on his way to leading health care reform. It appears that the president has found a way to bypass Congress approval.

Other parties have expressed concern about this issue. Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va sent a letter to the president on February 23rd.(link). Other examples of czar concern can be found very easily. Therefore, it is not just me that has concern.

In conclusion, in addition to this czar controversy, I see the government bailout banks, auto makers, record deficits and my own personal erosion of net worth. All of these make me very concerned about the well being of our country. Is this nation going down the right path?

Published by Tom Treloar

Born and raised in The Denver metro area, primarily the west and southwest area. Retired for over two years and trying new and different things that I never had the time or took the time to try. I enjoy shar...  View profile

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • e holtz9/26/2009

    tommy, the conservatives coined the use of the word and now they are using it to condemn our sitting president! how classy. how typical. rush and glen come out with this "concern" and suddenly the american (conservative) public has picked it up and is now "concerned" as well! FYI, any federal employee is paid by us the citizens of the USA. that's you and me. right on b jones. way to go.

  • B Jones8/15/2009

    Why are presidential czars criticized only now? I don't remember any political outcries when George Bush created the positions and the term in 1989. The blame resides there. Anyway, people such as this have always been in existence in the US. Just because they have a Russian title doesn't really give them any more power than the heads of programs in decades past. The whole argument is moot.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.