The comic book was fairly ground-breaking. Long gone were the romantic vampires who were also lovers that Anne Rice liked to write about. These guys were stone-cold killers. They did not look attractive. Their mouths were permanently stained with blood and their mouths were full of rows of fangs, like some kind of shark mouth. They had long, scary, dirty claws at the end of their fingers. In short, they were inhuman and they were scary, the way vampires were meant to be.
Of course, a premise like that was destined for the big screen. When I first heard that "30 Days of Night" was coming to the big screen I met it with a mix of excitement and trepidation. As I mentioned in a recent review of "Iron Man" the translation from comic book to screen is hit or miss. When the movie came and went from theaters faster than the month it is black in the fictional town of Barrow I was even more worried.
Well, "30 Days of Night" is now available on DVD, video and OnDemand. It will soon be making the rounds on cable television networks. I am pleased and surprised to tell you that if you are a fan of horror and, in particular, a fan of the vampire movie this is well worth your time.
The movie stars Josh Hartnett as the Sheriff of the tiny Alaskan town of Barrow. The town is preparing for the month-long siege of darkness. At the same time, a stranger shows up. He cuts the town off completely from the rest of the world, ends up in the jail cell, and begins taunting the sheriff and his family that there is death coming.
This is where the vampires show up. They are not your standard movie vampires. These are translations of the creatures from the comic book. Their mouths are full of fangs. They speak in shrieks and noises. Their leader, portrayed by Danny Huston, speaks in some kind of language that requires sub-titles. Even he says, at one point, "We should have come here years ago."
The scenes of the town's slaughter are, to say the least, brutal. This is a movie not for the squeamish. Blood flows quite regularly and when the towns people start having to chop off a head or two to prevent someone bitten from becoming part of the undead, well, you may find yourself turning away from the screen.
This is not a great movie. I don't want to give anyone the impression that this is a movie in the pantheon of something like "Alien" or "Halloween" or "The Thing" but for something you might think of renting, adding to your NetFlix queue or happen to catch some late night on cable, this is a pretty good flick.
The characters are not sketched out in any great detail. This is the kind of thing that really throws off the critics and I do recall many of them complaining about that when the movie was in theaters. I, for one, don't really mind that when it comes to my horror. I like the action to get started and the scenes of the slaughter, with the townspeople running and the vampires eating, are edge-of-your-seat and terrifying. I enjoyed similar scenes in the beginning of the remake of "Dawn of the Dead."
Josh Hartnett is passable as the lead character. He is not exactly a great actor, but he is pleasant enough and easy to watch. The rest of the cast is, well, really, when you get down to it just meat for the vampires. As such, they manage to play their parts well.
Does the movie have some scares? Yes. Does the movie entertain? Yes. Do the vampires do evil things? You bet. Do the good guys get to be heroes? Yes.
The ending is the same as the one in the comic book. If you read the book then you will know how this one ends up. There are some characters that have been eliminated from the movie that were in the comic book that I was only slightly disappointed to see go, but you won't miss them enough to be concerned. You will root for the townsfolk and you will definitely despise the vampires and that's the way it should be in a vampire movie.
Again, be warned, this is a violent movie. The blood flows freely. The vampires are definitely mean. There is nothing romantic or gothic here.
Published by Bryan Alaspa
I am a freelance writer living in the Chicago area. Please visit website www.bryanalaspa.com and check out my other writing. I have been writing reviews and entertainment content for Associated Content for... View profile
- 30 Days of NightVampires. Alaska. 30 Days of Night.
- 30 Days of Night Film ReviewDirector David Slade's use of story telling and camera work sets 30 Days of Night apart from other vampire flicks
- 30 Days of Night ReviewA new movie to recently come to DVD is 30 Days of Night. 30 Days of Night is a movie that takes place in Barlow, Alaska during the thirty days that Barlow falls under because of the state's close proximity to the Nort...
- 30 Days of Night: Should You Spend Even One Night?A review of the vampire movie based on the graphic novel 30 Days Of Night
- Book Review: "30 Days of Night Scriptbook"The definitive look at the screenplay for the epic vampire film.
- 30 Days of Night: Vampires and Abandonment Issues in Alaska
- Movie Review: 30 Days of Night
- 30 Days of Night Nothing More Than a Typical Zombie Movie with Vampires
- 30 Days of Night Brings Fresh Blood to Vampire Genre
- Graphic Novel Review: 30 DAYS of NIGHT: BEYOND BARROW
- Graphic Novel Review: 30 DAYS of NIGHT: 30 DAYS 'TIL DEATH
- "30 Days of Night": A DVD Movie Review
- The movie is not great but entertaining
- The vampires are not romantic they are scary
- This movie is worth catching on cable or video.

3 Comments
Post a CommentThe vampires are only groundbreaking as far as movies are concerned. Brian Lumley's Necroscope vampires are as, if not a whole lot more, brutal as these vampires. Good, entertaining flick.
I thought this movie was brilliant. I wish i has seen it on big screen. It was tense throughout the movie.
i think that 30 days of night is one of the best horror movies ever. it provides thrills blood spills and i have to say that him being my idol, Josh Hartnett was exceptional and i nearly loved this performance as much as the the one he gave as slevin in lucky number slevin.
if yo love hartnett like me, then you will love this film and his performance!