Whistleblower: Astronaut "Joe" Retrieved from Dysfunct Spy Satellite
Follow-Up
As most people know, the U.S. government and its factions is a complex institution. In the echelon of varying Depts., not all 'secret information' is presented to President Bush by the appointed heads governing the multi-layered departments. In such an intricate web of governmental duties for the U.S. welfare towards its citizens, not all abide - unfortunately - by the standard rule of ethics.
On Feb. 18, nearing noon, Richard J. Boylan, Phd., wrote an e-mail to President Bush endeavoring to bring him to the attention that a "hybrid astronaut" was stranded aboard the dying space satellite.
Within a couple of hours, an informant in a position to be aware of developments within the White House, NASA, and of Cabal commununications, via intercepts, contacted Boylan providing him with information regarding "Joe", the stranded astronaut.
The informant relayed that Boylan's letter along with other e-mails from citizens to the White House "got attention" from the "Good Guys/Gals" working there. "Oscar" relayed to Boylan, "The 'good guys' did not know they had an astronaut up there, and within the hour calls were made. The switchboard lit up."
In continuing, "One official in the White House was heard yelling into his phone to NASA, 'What in the h*ll are you boys doing up there!'. White House officials said threateningly to NASA, 'If we find out you got Bio (a living person) on board, you can kiss your Spring Break goodbye!'. "
At the time, the Cabal were rushing to get their "Johnson" up there before the White House would be able to get their astronauts to the failing spy satellite. ("Johnson" is NASA's term for their special astronauts who operate out of the clandestine Space City facility, Johnson Space Center-West, within White Sands Missile Range near Las Cruces, New Mexico. The Cabal have a lot of their people at Space City, and have a Headquarters there.)
The White House had ordered a quiet, urgent special rescue flight by a space-rescue astronaut aboard an undeclared spacecraft out of Space City, NM, to retrieve the stranded hybrid astronaut 'Joe', and bring him back safely to Earth.
At the time and according to Boylan, "It is a de-facto race between the Good Guys' rescue astronaut and the Cabal's 'Johnson' to see who can reach 'Joe' first....but the Cabal don't want to bring 'Joe' back alive".
The Pentagon informant stipulated, "The Cabal will kill 'Joe' if they get him first."
'Oscar' reported that "the White House had ordered the Cabal to back off, and let the officially-authorized NASA rescue team retrieve 'Joe' from the dying satellite."
By Feb.19th, the following day, Boylan received news that at 3:23 p.m. PST, the 'White Hats' within the government had sent a message (intercepted by 'Oscar' - informant), "Precious Cargo has been retrieved." (According to Boylan, the "White Hats" is a term he commonly uses to illustrate or denote those in power doing their jobs ethically.) It was understood that 'Joe' had been successfully retrieved from the stricken satellite and placed aboard the NASA Retrieval Vehicle for transport back to Earth.
Informant 'Oscar' also included that the Cabal sent a message: "Our Bobbies have some serious explaining to do." , a reference indicative to the inability of the Cabal European forces to stop the 'White Hats' from getting to 'Joe'.
As the original plan by the Pentagon , in collaboration with NASA and the U.S. Dept. of Defense to have the dysfunct spy satellite shot down by Thursday, decisions were made to advance the time schedule - as an opportunity arose with an "open window" - to send a missile on Weds. (Feb.20) at 10:30 p.m. EST. According to the latest updates, a SM-3 missile was fired from the USS Lake Erie in the Pacific at about 10:26 p.m. EST (0326 GMT Thursday), the Pentagon said in a statement.
Published by Shan-Lyn Forsythe
Shan-Lyn is a professional songwriter composer and musician. Her parallel passion is being a free-lance writer. She researches in alternative health sciences and 'green energy' ; and is also keen on home imp... View profile
- Strong Third Quarter Results for SIRIUS Satellite RadioThe news of the possible merger of SIRIUS Satellite Radio with XM Satellite Radio has been in the news recently and is awaiting government approval. Meanwhile, SIRIUS Satellite Radio considers to post positive economi...
- Consumer Review of XM Xpress Satellite RadioHowever, it is the pure convenience of having coast to coast coverage, and all of the best music and top hits at the tip of my fingers that makes the XM Xpress satellite radio such a bargain.
- Warm Weather Makes Satellite Dish's CrazyYou may want to think twice before getting a Satellite Dish. They may start out trouble free, but eventually they are usually more trouble then they're worth.
- NASA Now Able to Photograph Far-Away EarthsIt looks as though NASA has developed new technology that will allow astronomers at long last to be able to photograph far away Earth-like worlds and distinguish them as being such.
- Ten Reasons Why You Should Not Buy Satellite Internet ServiceFor some users living in areas with limited broadband services, Satellite may be their only choice. For some, this may sound like a good idea, but let me tell you… it is perhaps one of the worst decisions you'll...
- NASA Announces New Astronaut Hiring for Those with the Right Stuff
- NASA Astronaut Arrested on Murder Charge
- Whistleblower: Government to Use a Guided Missile to Kill Secret Astronaut Aboard...
- New NASA Space Crafts Finally Named
- How Satellite TV Works
- Congress Should Suspend NASA Until the War in Iraq is Over
- Chinese Missile Destroys Satellite
20 Comments
Post a CommentIn common news (the news we tend more to trust), if people can clone dogs and other life forms then why would it be so hard for scientists to clone humans? I think this is a common thought. Logically, if people can be cloned then what would stop certain parts of our gov. from using this means to their benefit? It doesn't matter who reveals the information. If a person walks out of a looney ward and says, "There's someone sitting in a car across the street", and a walking bystander says the same information, is the information going to be discredited just because the person from a looney ward said it? Too much emphasis is being placed on the person who is bringing the information. Remember that we have a 'shadow gov.' and it is true that not all the information is given to Pres Bush. Just look at law depts and how they fight for territory.
Wow! Looks like quite a discussion is ensuing over this one. Great job! :-)
The Cabal are doing everything in their power to make every UFO investigator look like nutcases. I read the first part of this story and I have to give credit to the writer for going out on a limb. This is a wide jump though. Talk about going straight to the punch line.
To the author, thank you for stirring things up. The people need to think a bit more seriously as to what is really going on over their heads. I bet you punched a few holes in the warped system that many weren't counting on. This is serious stuff and the people need to take a better look instead of running in their bathrooms scared. Maybe you just chose the wrong person with the 'insider news'.
Seidr, I almost bought your take UNTIL you posted an advertisement link. Nice way for you to grab an opportunity for yourself. Such trivial information. Your tonality wreaks competition. Greer is also top notch with the Disclosure Project and you size him down also. Would it have been different if someone else reached the WH? One thing is certain, we don't always know what is really going on out there. Also to be taken into consideration is that Ufologists eventually become experiencers themselves. Name me one Ufologist that hasn't been privy to such events. And if by chance they have received direct contact does this mean they've lost their sense of objectivity? I think the whole picture is being missed here. One thing is clear, 'something' is going on. http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
For a measured perspective on the many personalities in the UFO world and the claims they make, the site http://www.ufowatchdog.com/ is good. I fully support UFO activism but I think people should be cautious about backing claims which are unsubstantiated and uncorroborated. UFO researchers investigate sightings, interview witnesses, and bring reason to bear on cases. There's a big difference between that and claiming to be in touch with the galactic federation.
Note to Commenters: Please post your comments without defamation. Constructive opinion is allowed regarding the contents of the article. Thank you.
I guess everyone forgot that the astronaut was saved. It's good to understand that our government does have a conscience. We might not always know what they're doing but I think we must never forget that no matter how bleak some things may be there is always light at the end of the tunnel. I think this applies to people too. Seidr, I don't think anyone has to prove you wrong because your doing it all by yourself. Just my two cents. I think the human race is a strong one no matter the mess we have gotten ourselves into. Somewhere we do know what is best to do.
Let me make a prediction. Sometime this year there'll be a ufo sighting. Boylan will send out an opportunistic email saying the sighting is the advance guard of the fake invasion fleet. Then he'll call a joint psychic initiative, a handful of people will participate and email back their psychic impressions - daydreams in other words - then Boylan will claim the fake invasion has been thwarted, there'll be some mutual back-patting and then nothing more dramatic than that will occur. Prove me wrong.
I used to trust Stephen Greer but then I found that he can be misleading. For example, he charges hundreds of dollars to teach people to vector in spacecraft, and yet in all these excursions he never comes back with any photos or proof. Ironically, Boylan dislikes Dr Greer, but I think this has to do more with jealousy over Greer's higher profile. After all, Boylan also claims to have insider knowledge, but if he had to bring his witnesses to the National Press Club, they'd just consist of channelers. You know Whitley Strieber called Boylan an idiot for conflating the Vatican monsignior's comments? I haven't seen Boylan criticise Strieber, because that would open a can of worms - i.e. Boylan only got interested in abductees after reading Communion. I regard Boylan-watching as entertainment more than anything. Watching a hoaxer and his credulous audience. attention's all he wants. Let me make a prediction. Boylan's said more than once that 2008 is the year the faked alien inva