Who Are Latinos?

Alyce Rocco
In the article "Who Are La Razas", La Razas were identified as people who identify themselves as "The Race". The NCLR defines "the race" as being comprised of Latinos or Hispanics. Latina refers to females. Latinos do not consider themselves Hispanics or descendents of Spain. Latinos and Hispanics use forms of the Spanish language. The La Razas are making such a ruckus in the United States of America it caused me to wonder exactly who Latinos are.

The Latin language was spoken by the people of Latium a region of ancient Italy. Because the people of Latium were living in the area before history was recorded not much is known about their origins. Conquered by the Romans in 338 BC, Latin became the formal language of Romans. "Vulgar Latin" was used among the soldiers and merchants of Rome. Languages derived from Vulgar Latin were later called "Romance Languages". These include languages such as Spanish, French, Portuguese, and Italian. Who are Latinos? Are they a race of people descended from Latium's or from the Roman Empire?

Latin America is considered to be "Latin" because the majority of the people speak one of the Romance Languages. Latin America is roughly comprised of 21,069,501 square kilometers as compared to 24,490,000 sq. km.square of other American lands. The American Continents were named after the Italian explorer, Americus Vespucci. Armies from Spain conquered much of the lands of South and Central America. English and French settlers took over the Northern parts of the Continent. Thus "Latinos" could be said to be descendents of the Spanish Conquistadores. This confuses me because the La Raza's precept is that the United States stole their land. The land at the time of Spain's invasion belonged to many people who were not Latinos.

The La Razas believe Texas belongs to them. Yet the original inhabitants of Texas were not of the Latino race. They consisted of what is commonly know as tribes. Some of these tribes include Apache, Comanche, Cherokee, Choctaw and Kickapoo. South of Texas were civilizations known as Mayans, Altecs and Incas. The La Razas also claim New Mexico as their own, yet Pre-Spanish residents were known to be Pueblo's or Apacheans.

It is believed that the inhabitants of North America arrived on foot on a strip of land that is now covered with water, called "The Bering Strait" and migrated south. They came from Western Europe or Asian countries. Spanish explorers arrived and planted the flag of Spain along the coastline in the 1400s. In the 1700's Russian had also claimed much of the north west Pacific Coastline as their own. It appeared that the land was uninhabited. When the English explorers arrived via land, they too claimed it as their own. Disputes over ownership of the coastline sprang up. The Pope in Rome settled the disputes amicably with a Papal Bull.

To the best of my knowledge the natives inhabiting the land were not consulted as Spain, Great Britain, France and Russian settlers battled over ownership of the Americas. The exception being the Mayans who joined forces with the Spanish armies to conquer the Aztecs who routinely used them as human sacrifices to their gods. The Spanish explorers and armies brought diseases that caused many natives to die. Their armies slaughtered what were called indigenous peoples to wipe out their civilizations and force compliance with Spanish rule. Does this mean Latinos are still trying to conquer the Americas for old Spanish monarchies that no longer exist?

Who are Latino's? Research leads me to believe the National Council of La Raza's claimed the word to describe various groups of people who are united in speaking a form of the Romance Language of Spain. The Spanish language derived from the language spoken by Latiums whose land was conquered or stolen from them by Romans. Like those Romans or blood-thirsty Spaniards, it seems they selfishly want to control the world rather then learn to share and live in peace and harmony. Perhaps "The Race" will win the race to separate humans rather than create unity. My understanding of what makes the United States of America great is that it is a land of many cultures and ethnicities.

Resources:
Various Authors and Sources cited, Wikipedia. Latin
Various Authors, Wikipedia. History of Mexico

Author's Note: This article is intended for educational purposes. Any opinions expressed are mine and not endorsed by Associated Content or it's Editors.

11 Comments

Post a Comment
  • TSherill8/6/2009

    What is amazing is that people from la raza hate Europeans as I have seen graffiti here in So Cal %2522 Go back to Europe%2522 yet they are calling themselves Latinos%252C the name of a white European tribe and speak a European language.

  • blasi2510/10/2008

    well in understanding, latino is somebody who speaks any lenguage that came out of the latin root, example, spanish, italian ,french, portuguese, maybe romanian,... hispanic was a clasification given by some president of the USA, i cant remember who exactly, anyway hispanic was something similar to say, african-american, caucacian, asian, etc,..to me this word is related to the spaniard, becuase back in the days, spain was called HISPANIA,.. now to who ever say im spanish that means he most be from spain, but some times people say that as in: i speak spanish, is something similar when we say we are the best and "we the best".... well i hope this could help to others, by the way, i dont think hispanic refers to blacks or "negros"... amongst people who speak spanish you could find, indians blacks and whites mixed together thats why many cubans or dominicans or boricuas look more african, becuase the have more roots of it, and mexicans or south americans look more indians becuase th

  • Alyce Rocco9/25/2007

    A local paper Letter to the Editor said Mexican/Americans are not Hispanic, because Hispanic meant blacks, Asians and Cubans. East Coast Puerto Rician friends use Hispanic; West Coast Mexican friends use Latino. The people I have known from Cuba, El Salvador, Hondorus (spelling), Columbia prefer "Cuban, El Salvadorian, Hondurian (and again spelling) and Columbian". Oh, and I guess I knew a few people from the Dominican Republic. I like to think we are all human beings, not labels. : >

  • Shamontiel9/25/2007

    A Dominican cat told me he prefers Latino over Hispanic because Hispanic is equal to Negro. I've called __________ people Latino ever since. Your article sparked conversation between me and a Dominican buddy of mine about what she prefers to be called, and if it's due to history or name preference or both. I'm waiting on her response as I type this message.

  • Alyce Rocco7/26/2007

    FYI: Published the remainder my "erasism" series here:
    http://www.mamariano.biz/ac.htm

  • Melanie Schwear6/13/2007

    This is very very informative and interesting!

  • Sophie6/7/2007

    Interesting article, Alyce.
    Sophie

  • Tina Wettin6/6/2007

    Very informative article.

  • Alyce Rocco6/4/2007

    Andre, the NCLR was formed to deal with legimate "claims" about issues in the early 1900s USA. My series of articles was to point out that there is enough war and bloodshed worldwide without starting another civil war in todays USA.

  • Joniv6/2/2007

    Very interesting and informative.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.