Ozone only makes up 0.00006% of the earth's atmosphere but it's utility to prevent catastrophic conditions on earth make it a vital natural barrier to preserve our ecosystem and by default, our very way of life. The fear three decades ago was that the man-made green house gases (GHGs) of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) from aerosol cans and freon then being used for cooling units in our homes, cars and refrigerators were literally burrowing a hole in the Ozone layer, allowing excessive UV rays to reach earth's surface and amplifying global warming conditions around the planet. This amplified heat in turn breaks down Ozone in the atmosphere, further reducing it's solar reflective abilities needed to sustain life here.
This latter indication reveals the link between climate change and the depletion of the ozone layer. As the global temperatures warm up it creates a weakening effect on the Ozone layer above us. Natural occurrences of global warming over the history of the planet are a factor that are beyond our control. However, the rapid increase of measured global warming that climate scientist are detecting today appear to be coming from our two and half centuries use of fossil fuels. As we burn energy sources from coal, oil and natural gas we emit the spent CO2 from these elements into the atmosphere at an alarmingly increased level, thus effecting a man-made amplification that heats our planet faster than nature intended.
It is this warming affect that produces climate changes unlike any we have seen in our life times. As more heat occurs and warms the oceans water, moisture is generated and intensifies flooding conditions in warmer climes and snow storms in more frigid northern regions. Where this intensified heat occurs over land we are witnessing greater drought periods that produce more fires. These fires destroy vast areas of plant life that absorbs CO2, thus reducing a component in our ecosystem that aids in sustaining a natural balance.
It's a cycle that becomes harder and harder to stop and reverse as Western economies expand, emitting most of the CO2 from fossil fuel use. But it becomes even more difficult as the expanding economies of China and India enter the fray with their use of coal-powered plants and increased use of carbon burning automobiles and machines. In fact, China has advanced so fast over the last decade that it has surpassed the U.S. as the highest emitter of GHGs, primarily consisting of CO2 from fossil fuels.
This all adds a burden to the fragile Ozone layer in the stratosphere. Climate scientist have found that CO2 levels currently exist at about 390 part per million (ppm), a number that is above what they feel is a safe and life sustaining level of 350 ppm. In order for us to have a fighting chance of preserving this barrier between us and excessive solar rays that will more rapidly effect disastrous climate changes for us all, it becomes imperative that we do what we can as a race to prevent its destruction.
Man's contribution to global warming is a real threat. Most of the nations contributing to the increased CO2 levels from finite sources of fossil fuels have recognized this and are taking steps to converting their base energy to cleaner, renewable sources like wind, solar, geo-thermal and marine.
Currently the biggest polluter, China, is in the lead as it replaces it's thousands of coal-powered plants with renewable sources and establishes standards for new development that replaces dated fossil fuel products with 21st century green technology. The U.S. is making changes in this area too but has run into resistance from Industry lobbyists who continue to advance more coal, oil and natural gas sources to power our economy.
Time however is not on our side. Even if we were to completely remove fossil fuels as the primary energy source for our economy tomorrow, it would take 30-40 years before the CO2 already emitted from this source would dwindle back down to levels below a safe and sustainable 350 ppm. The damage to the Ozone layer by then may or may not be reversible but inaction is not a likely course we should gamble our future with.
RESOURCES:
Published by L B Woodgate
Freelance writer presently residing in Denton, Tx. just north of Dallas-Ft.Worth with a focus on the political and social issues of our time. Former Marine and Vietnam Vet. I earned my B.A. from the Univ... View profile
- Is CO2 Really Green? One Scientist Says We Need Not Less but More CO2Is carbon dioxide really good for the environment? This scientist says it is and that what we really need is not legislation on cap and trade, but more CO2 to make the earth a greener, lusher place.
- Crude Oil and Alternative SourcesMain source of energy is crude oil is nonrenewable source. Alternative sources of energy: Biomas, Hydroelectric, Solar Power, Wind Energy, Tidal, Fusion Energy, and Fuel cells power. Second largest is Nuclear Energy....
- Coal Production and Demand of Balance in ChinaChina is importing more and exporting less coal and had almost certainly turned a net coal import country in 2007 for the first time in its history and will probably remain one in the near future.
The BP Oil Spill Camera: Taking Pictures of a Young EarthWe see oil spouting out of the sea floor 'like a stuck pig'. But if I told you that a still bleeding pig had been 'stuck' an eon ago, would you believe me?- Social Implications of Human Population Growth and the Effect on Global Climate Ch...One of the most pressing social issues of the 21st century, both in the United States and abroad, will be human population growth and its effect on global climate change.
- Our Protector the Ozone Layer
- NOAA Study Reports Improvements in the Ozone Hole Since Last Year
- What is the UV Index?
- EPA CO2 Emissions Ruling for Coal-Fired Plants Puts Clean Coal on the Fast Track
- Why Energy Policy is Important to John and Jane Doe
- Ozone: Good or Bad?
- Converting CO2 Emissions into Fuel





3 Comments
Post a CommentI'm sure that superrich will find a way to survive... and continue to vote Republican.
I imagine that the planet would survive without it.... Our species, however, would most certainly not.
It's hard to get people on board when those against changing from fossil fuels deny the existence of global warming.