Who Should Have to "take a Good Ass Chewing" at Their Job?
United States Court of Appeals -UPS Vs. Ms. Crone
Based on the case I have read, I don't believe Ms. Crone gave sufficient evidence that she was discriminated against for being female, or being too sensitive (men can be sensitive too!) I believe that the whole situation between the union drivers, the supervisor and Ms. Crone was handled poorly and find it hard to believe that the UPS doesn't have a better way of handling these types of situations.
The questions I have are why would someone in a supervisor position need to be able to take yelling or "a good ass chewing" I think this was a poor choice of words by Ms. Crone's supervisor, and am curious as to what disciplinary action he received for that. What kind of job requires the ability to "take a good ass chewing". Have you ever seen on anyone's resume with a Skill "Can take a good ass chewing". What is wrong with this picture?
Maybe I am just hung up on the total lack of professionalism, I expect more from UPS. With a company as large as UPS there has to be checks and balances. Furthermore, procedures should in place so that yelling and ass chewing is not part of the equation.
My next question I have is, do the union truck drivers treat the men in similar positions of Ms. Crone the same way? Or is this something they think because she is a women they can bully her?
What bothers me most is Ms. Crone said "Ms. Crone also admitted that she has demonstrated some difficulty dealing with confrontational situations in the past and on at least one occasion was close to tears when a truck driver was confrontational with her as a dispatcher. Though Ms. Crone believes she has overcome or outgrown those difficulties," Why should anyone in any position have to be able to "take a good ass chewing" for no apparent reason except for the fact that the union drivers get the rocks off being confrontational.
References:
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-3595
___________
Sarah Crone, *
*Plaintiff - Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States v.
* District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
United Parcel Service, Inc., *
*Defendant - Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 18, 2002
Filed: August 30, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
Published by Sheri Taylor
As a Single Parent, I've become a master of multi-tasking. I've worked in Managment for over 10 years and graduted with a BS of 3.92 GPA. I'm proof it can be done. View profile
- Florida Ban on Homosexual Adoption Born of Bias and IgnoranceFlorida ban of adopting by homosexuals flies in the face of respected professional views. Many gay adults already serve as foster parents butt Florida's law stands in the way of their adopting them, and offering a pe...
- Trials and Tribulations of Subversion: Fear, Paranoia, and the Smith Act TrialA research paper that gives a brief background of the Red Scare in the United States followed by an analysis of the Smith Act Trial.
De-Segregation of Schools and the Power of the CourtsThis article examines the various court cases that the Supreme Court and other courts heard dealing with Segregation and the power that the courts had to exert to make it happen.- U.S. V. Fordice: The Irony of Integration and the Elusive Goal of EqualityThis is a research paper that explains the history and impact of an important Supreme Court case, United States v. Fordice, which mandated that the State of Mississippi desegregate publically funded black colleges and...
- Censorship Hinders Right to Free Speech: Unfair Burden of Broadcast IndecencyWhile my tastes may not be for everybody, there are many of us who like things that others might find offensive. I enjoy seeing the world through a very different set of eyes, even if I fiercely disagree with them.
- Uncle Jake's Guide to Marriage
- Ego in a Box: How Our Vehicles Affect Us
- Landmark Case: D.C. Court of Appeals Overturns D.C. Gun Ban
- Terrorists Cannot Be Successfully Challenged by a United States Willing to Forgo...
- Ibrahim Parlak's Fate in the Hands of U.S. Court of Appeals
- Key Factors Surrounding the Debate of Rescheduling Marijuana in the United States
- Court of Appeals Judge Says Tracking Using GPS System Without a Warrant is OK
- Is this something they think because she is a women they can bully her?
- , I don't believe Ms. Crone gave sufficient evidence that she was discriminated against for being female, or being too sensitive (men can be sensitive too!)
- No one should have to take verbal abuse in the workplace.
