Do you know what the whole issue boils down to folks? It is a pack of losers saying that since they are too damn lazy to read a candidates' positions, the politicians ought to walk around door to door and spell their beliefs out for them. It is people that have so little faith in their own intelligence and judgment, that they base their vote on a TV spot. What are you people thinking?
I hear people say all the time that money is destroying the democratic process. Nonsense! Apathy and stupidity are spoiling the democratic process. You want your representative to stop taking money from PAC's? Then you vote for one that won't take their money. If HE takes money from PAC's, you vote for someone else again. Eventually politicians will get the hint that it is in their best interests to run less expensive, more substantive campaigns. Trust me on this one, if there is one class of people in this world that reacts well to hints, it's politicians.
I also hear that if a candidate has too much money he can keep his opponent off of the airwaves, thus dooming his campaign. Kids, if you are basing your decision of who is going to be writing the laws that impact you life on the news you get from Television...you need a whole bunch more than campaign reform. Do you want to know where you can go to get information on the various candidates? Do you want my secret formula on staying well informed? You that bunch of paper that comes wrapped around the sports and comics every morning? It's called a newspaper, you might want to check one out come election time. They have all sorts of secret stuff like where the candidates stand on the issues and how the incumbents voted. You would be amazed at how little impact a thirty second spot has on your outlook when you know the facts.
Did you ever wonder why newspapers usually don't have political ads in them? It's because people that read newspapers are more likely to look at the ad critically and take it apart than someone who gets their news sandwiched between "Baywatch" and "Xena: Warrior Princess". Why take an ad out in the paper when the person reading it has the facts to refute it at his fingertips? That's just silly, when you have all those lunkheads out there sucking up your "Family Values" pabulum off of the TV.
It really is quite simple, folks. We don't need to enact yet more laws to govern the way our Democracy works. When you get right down to it, anything more than "one person, one vote" is pretty superfluous. What else, really, do you have to regulate? At it's core, democracy is a pretty easy concept to understand. If I like what you say about the issues I care about, I am going to vote for you. If on the other hand, I think you are a numbskull who couldn't govern his own bladder, I will not vote for you. The only thing that all of this money buys is advertising, folks! It doesn't change their positions on the issues, it doesn't change their voting record, it doesn't change what they believe. The only way that too much money can be damaging to politics is if it comes in the form of bribes and guess what, we have had laws against that for a long time now.
The problem boils down to one thing. The same thing that most political problems of the late twentieth century have boiled down to when you clear away the fluff. People are just too damn cynical or too damned bored or too damned stupid to use their vote wisely. Unfortunately, there is no movement to pass a law to stop that.
Published by Dean Shutt
I have been a writer for most of my life, mostly short stories and poetry as a youth. A few years ago, a friend and I started SCROOMtimes, an online magazine. I was a main contributor to that for over 5 year... View profile
US Supreme Court Campaign Finance Ruling Draws Presidential ThreatIn the wake of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court campaign finance decision is said to allow Wall Street and labor unions to overtly buy politicia...
America- Are You Blind or Just Stupid?Almost everyday we hear something else about ole "W". Are you surprised? What did America do in 2000 electing this "bad boy" rebel into the highest office in the country?- Top Ten Reasons Why Conservatives Are WrongRush Limbaugh, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, George Bush and the far right of the Republican party don't have a clue.
- How Important is Communication Rhetoric in a Presidential Campaign?This article was written after the 2000 presidential campaigns and examines the various political rhetoric that both major candidates used during their respective races.
- The GOP Campaign in the 2010 Mid-term Has Already BegunI would not be surprised to hear Palin reiterating that Obama "palling around with terrorists," and referring to "pro-American" parts of the country.
- Raising Money on the Campaign Trail Now Defining the Best Presidential Candidate
- Updating "The Making of the Presidential Candidates 2004"
- Campaign Finance Reform in America
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Brian Imus Working Toward Illinois Campaign Funding Reform
- Are Americans Dumb?
- Campaign Finance


1 Comments
Post a CommentGranted, rampant stupidity in the electorate is a factor...but the very nature of current campaign funding needs overhauled. Public financing of campaigns is the way to go, it will actually save money and we will get much better politicians...