Like him, I have long stood firm in my belief that only through mutual respect and cooperation can the United States continue to be the great nation we know that it can be. We are a nation that believes in freedom for all, not just for the dominant, whether they be only a few or a majority, to dictate to the rest. We believe in the freedom to love, in the freedom to live, the freedom to share our ideas, and the freedom to seek our own happiness within this great experiment called democracy.
For each of us, freedom is something precious, even though it is all too often taken for granted. Freedom is also something fragile, a delicate balance between the guarantees of fairness for all and the liberty of each individual. In this place, we are free to live as we wish, but we are not free to cause harm to our fellow citizens, or infringe on their rights.
Once, we understood these things. Once, these principles were at the very core of what it meant to be American. Once, the debate between and within the parties consisted entirely of how best to fulfill that promise of our Republic to our people.
That is the promise of change offered by this year's Democratic nominee, so eloquently stated by a true Republican: a return to the promise of America. Once more, we can be One Nation, one people, living in the greatest country on Earth - one with Liberty and Justice for All.
Many of us are critical of one or both candidates, vowing to withhold our votes, because of certain isolated mistakes those mortal men have made; of them I ask: Who is the perfect candidate that we should vote for? Many of us would choose to vote, but to vote out of anger, casting a ballot for a candidate we do not believe in as an act of revenge against our own parties for some symbolic - and irrelevant - slight; of them I ask: What is truly important to you? Many of us would vote based on circumstance alone, be it for reasons of race, or wealth, or the struggles of days long past; of them I ask: Is it more important who a person is, or where he has been, than how he leads? Many of us would vote, not for a candidate, but against the other, because we are so cynical, so bitter, that we would actually choose to turn down that which seems too good to be true, whether or not it is; of them I ask: Is your faith in your own worth so worn that you cannot trust in your own ability - not any politician's, but your own - to make something better than what exists today, for yourself and for us all?
Of you all, I ask: Is there any single issue that is so important, any single decision either candidate promises to make, that is so vital that it outweighs the inspiration to work together, to live in peace with one another, and to, as one people, proud but respectful, opinionated but rational, help forge America into the nation it has always been destined to become?
To me, no policy, no campaign promise, and no party-line stance is so important as reestablishing that above all, beyond locality and party loyalty, we are all Americans first. We are a family, brothers and sisters, sharing a home that spans a continent and beyond. As one great leader once said, a house divided cannot stand. Once more, our house is divided. This November, let us all consider our family, those so dear to us that we would gladly lay down our lives to protect, even though we may have never met. This November, we are given the choice to elect another great leader, or to go on as we have for far too long.
That is what Barack Obama represents: the promise of true leadership. Not establishing universal healthcare, or a withdraw from Iraq, or enacting comprehensive energy reform, or any of the other articles of change he works toward - those are all issues of great importance, but none are so vital to the future of our land and the destiny of our children who will dwell here. If we fail to stand up, fail to reclaim control of our own lives, fail to remember that we don't need to wait on Washington to give us solutions, but can take action on our own, then we run the risk of never returning to the America of Jefferson and Lincoln and Roosevelt. By failing to restore the promise of America, we risk losing it for all time.
It is not who Barack Obama is or what he hopes to do as President that makes him so important, but what he represents. He cannot give us back what we have squandered, but his leadership can inspire us to return to our most important duty: to forge a more perfect union, by the people, for the people, and of the people. We can achieve our dreams, if only we believe in our own ability to do so.
This is what Rep. Leach had to say: www.associatedcontent.com/article/987824/james_leach_r_at_dnc_denver.html
Or, you can listen to the audio here: www.associatedcontent.com/audio/4434/rep_james_leach_r_at_dnc_denver_august.html
Published by Bryan Belrad
The mind behind Zero Sum Theory, author of best-selling fiction and non-fiction, see what else he's up to on Facebook. View profile
Barack Obama: Controversial but GrandWhy Barack Obama is going to be an amazing President- Why Barack Obama Won't Debate Rush Limbaugh The many reasons why a Barack Obama vs. Rush Limbaugh radio debate won't happen
- Why Barack Obama Chose Biden for Running MateBarack Obama has done it again! Hitting the headlines with the story of a running mate Joseph R. Biden.
- Why Barack Obama Can't Bring the Change He PromisesBarack Obama constantly uses the catchphrase "change you can believe in," but he won't be able to deliver on that promise.
- Why Barack Obama, and His Campaign, Are so InspiringObama and his campaign have inspired millions because they "get it", and it shows.
- Why Barack Obama Will Not Be the Next President of the United States
- Post Election Analysis: Why Barack Obama Won Over John McCain
- Eight Reasons Why Barack Obama Will Be the Next President of the United States
- Why Barack Obama Could Not Make Hillary Clinton His Running Mate
- Reasons Why Barack Obama Won the Presidential Election of 2008
- Why Barack Obama is Exactly the Wrong Presidential Candidate for the Country at Th...
- Top Five Reasons Why Barack Obama Will Win in the March 4th Primaries
- What Jim Leach said: www.associatedcontent.com/article/987824/james_leach_r_at_dnc_denver.html
- We are a nation that believes in freedom for all.
- We are all Americans first.
- Our most important duty is to *each other*.


24 Comments
Post a CommentThis article represents my thoughts exactly, but I couldn't have gotten those thoughts from my brain to the screen as eloquently. Great article!
A small matter perhaps, but the photo and caption excellent.
Increasingly, our political leaders fail to understand the impact of inspiration and hope upon America and the world. At this juncture in American history, inspiration is key, and Obama has indeed shown the ability to inspire. While the naysayers scoff at hope, change, and the dream of a better America and world, we will move forward and leave them to their easy pessimism.
I see McCain picked Gov. Palin of Alaska. Is that a ploy to attract Hillary supporters? She's also anti-abortion and supports Big Oil. Is that to appease the ultra-conservatives? And as far as experience, she has far less than McCain's opponent! So who is playing those "same political games" now? ...... any comments, Bryan?
Sadie - what makes you think Obama is a "thug"? Just because he's from Chicago?
Our best days can still lie ahead. I totally agree with this statement.........but, not with Obama.........He is a Chicago "thug".
(sorry, ran too long, as I tend to) Should we repeat the failings of early industrial Europe, or advance into the 21st century? We can't do it with "more of the same" under McCain. Maybe we can't with"Hope" under Obama, either, But at least there's a chance. Can we afford NOT to take it?
Geeze Blowhard, you say "60's radical" like it's a bad thing! Were you raising the alarm against the excesses of big corporate government at that time? Did you work to end discrimination, or unfair labor practices? Who do you think raised the awareness of this nation? Although I don't claim total success for all our efforts, at least we tried, and most would say the country is somewhat better off for it. I too lived through the Cold War, but apparently, unlike you, can tell the difference between a Marxist and a Stalinist or Maoist. The latter two were despots similar to Hitler; Marx never advocated that. As a point of fact, his philosophy was directed at the inequalities between the rich and poor of England and Western Europe. Those nations have since adopted many of his social programs. And the last time I looked, the European Economic Union is now approaching being a superpower, while the United States is starting to fall behind. Should we repeat the failings of early indust
Instead, of villifying and dehumanizing the other side, why don't we agree that each of us has something of value to contribute, and use that knowledge to make our lives better today, and build a better, stronger America for our children? Is that such a terrible idea? And just because that idea is espoused by a Dem, does that make it automatically wrong? If so, doesn't that strike you as a problem?
I read your article, and, frankly, I see more of the commie goals coming from the Right than the Left - undermining American values, for one- Like the value that no group has the right to "regulate" the morals of the entire nation. Want another? How about the fiasco in Kansas a few years ago where the religious right tried to get "Creation Science" into the schools - isn't 'getting the party line into textbooks' on your list too? Seriously, I understand that you've had to live through some tough times - but how any of that is relevant is beyond me. We can't protect America by fighting the last war, and we won't get anywhere by continuing this left vs right nonsense. Can't you see it's all a tactic to keep us divided, a distraction to keep our minds off how badly we're being screwed? Why work for improvement when we can just blame the "idiots" on the other side?