Nothing except a newbie Senator from Illinois.
She came prepared with 35 years of experience in how to manipulate the system. She was a beloved First Lady, a Champion of the people, and a well-respected leader. She was the one who was "ready from Day One".
She was never ready for this.
Mike Lupica wrote in today's New York Daily News: "Barack Obama has been better organized, raised more money, won more states, gained more delegates and had a better strategy than Clinton from the start."
He came from behind, taking Iowa by storm with nothing but big dreams, big ideas, and hope - hope that after seven years under a political dictatorship whose polarizing core philosophy can be summed up as 'either you're with me, or you're a terrorist', America might at last be ready to end the partisan feud that has lobotomized us for several decades now.
He spoke of ending the rivalry that has become more important to the political process than the purpose for which it was designed: to govern this nation. In a rally on April 18th, he made the point crystal clear by stating that our so-called leaders have devolved into bickering children, competing in an arena where score is kept based on how many blows one can land on one's opponent, rather than measured by how many problems get solved.
Where Hillary is a master of the political game, ready for anything, she never dreamed that she'd be up against an opponent who won't engage her. He plays by his own rules, engaging the people instead, spreading his message of Change. In the game of politics, Hillary is unbeatable. But Barack Obama isn't playing politics; his kind of Change is a change in the nature of the game; his message is that it's well past time to put an end to it.
Barack bet right. We are sick of it. We're sick of the fighting, we're sick of the pointless name-calling, we're sick of the rhetoric, we're sick of the extremism on both sides, and we're sick of watching our country be torn apart while our "leaders" are to too busy maneuvering for position to bother with the actual leading.
And now it's come down to the wire. People still know Hillary better, and people do trust her. Her attacks have cost Obama dearly. To hear her tell it, it is he who is the child, full of nothing more than wishful thinking.
But people are hearing Obama too. As the "manufactured" controversies have spread, people have been hearing him more and more. And what they hear tells them this is a man with a Dream. They wonder, in the face of actual thought and powerful ideas, what does a pin matter? They ask, is this really the best his opponents can do?
The most damning thing they've been able to come up with yet is his affiliation with Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Is that it? He knows a person who is a racist?
Of course, this is supposed to be a big deal. The fact that McCain is trying to pander to the white supremacist "conservative base" is expected, even if he has to sell out his principles to do it. After all, being President is all about doing what you think isn't best, right?
The Clintons are also known for their affiliation with several prominent racists - Jessie Jackson, for example.
But Obama is supposed to be better than that, see. The fact that he is affiliated with an angry bigot is supposed to be significant, while the ties the other candidates have with hate-mongering lunatics is just general practice. Nothing to see there, folks.
Really, now, is there not one thing of actual substance that can be held up against Obama? Is there not one example of what he himself believes that contradicts his "unrealistic" platform of reasonable ideas?
Who does he think he is, anyway? Showing up at Hillary's party, spouting off with gross ideology like "we deserve better" and "we can do better" - the Audacity!
But while the other candidates try to convince the voters that Barack's dreams are naive, that the system will never allow America to be United again, that, even if elected, he cannot possibly succeed, the people answer them back.
Their response is simple, and clear. It says that despite all that has befallen us in the last seven years, the last 40 years, and all the way back to that day that our last truly great leader was shot in Dallas, we still have hope for the future. We still believe, because we know what the heart and soul of the greatest nation ever established on this Earth is made of.
On September 11th, 2001, this nation forgot about Red and Blue. We were filled with white-hot anger.
Today, Barack tells us that we can all be joined again, but this time in a bond of brotherhood. We can once more, and for all time, put away the color-coded thinking that has been the hallmark of American politics for half a century. We can stop following leaders who do nothing more than stand in place, singing and dancing for our amusement, and start leading ourselves, just as we did under that last great leader.
And to all those who tell us that he is wrong, that we can never be that way again, be they candidates for the presidency or other citizens who have given in to the despair and bitterness that comes from being crushed under the weight of the lame giant of politics, we answer with three simple words: "Yes. We. Can."
Because we know that the willful spirit of America today is the same as it has always been from the first settlers searching for a new life, and freedom in a land that they would build. It is the same drive that compels us to protect that freedom, and to keep building, no matter how many hands strive to keep us down. That spirit is the same force that directs us in all of our lives: it is the audacity to hope.
Published by Bryan Belrad
The mind behind Zero Sum Theory, author of best-selling fiction and non-fiction, see what else he's up to on Facebook. View profile
- Racial Issues in the Barack Obama Campaign: Jeremiah Wright, Obama-Bashing and Med...Is Barack Obama being over-scrutinized when it comes to racial issues in and around his campaign?
Rasmussen Poll: John McCain Passes Barack ObamaThe Rasmussen daily tracking Poll has, for the first time since Barack Obama clinched the Democratic Party nomination, given John McCain a slight edge. When "leaners" are factor...- Barack Obama at Concord High School: My ExperienceThis is my personal experience with listening to Barack Obama at Concord High School in Elkhart, Indiana.
- McCain Ad Compares Barack Obama to Paris Hilton, Britney SpearsThere's a new McCain ad out that appears to compare Barack Obama to both Paris Hilton and Britney Spears. The Barack Obama Campaign is, naturally, fit to be tied because their candidate is getting zinged again and thi...
Barack Obama Outraises John McCain in JuneDemocratic Candidate for President Barack Obama outraised John McCain in June and has, as of the end of May 2008, even outraised the Republican candidate for President in tradit...
- Barack Obama and the Youth Vote
- The Reasonable Barack Obama
- Barack Obama: Facts and Fairytales
- Over-Capacity Crowd at Barack Obama Rally in Seattle, Washington
- Barack Obama Addresses Newton, Iowa, Crowd on December 30
- Barack Obama: Fired Up and Ready to Go
- Presidential Hopeful Barack Obama Pays Youngstown State University a Visit

11 Comments
Post a CommentYou are rather naive. How can anybody look at Hillary Clinton and not realize that she turns with the tides. When she's in Texas, she's Mexican. When she's in Alabama, she's a hillbilly. When she's in Florida, she's an orange farmer. At least Obama is himself no matter where he goes. How many different accents have we heard Hillary use. Isn't she the Senator from New York? Hell, I don't even know anymore!!!
Vanessa - What polls are you looking at? Everything from NBC to Fox all show that Barack beats McCain in nationwide polls, and with a much higher percentage than Hillary. And as for his "faux pas" - if you've actually heard what he said, instead of the out-of-context tidbit Fox News plays, then you'd realize that his statement was dead-on accurate. It was not an insult, or a patronizing assertation of how 'quaint' rural people are, but an example of how important it is to reach out ot all Americans, that we're all in this together, and that we're all suffering together because of the divisions between us. All of which goes to show he is not so naive as some might like to think - he just plays by an entirely different set of rules. He isn't ignorant of how "the game" works; he just refuses to do things that way. Because he is the only candidate who realizes that healing America is more important than making the other guy look bad.
The tide is turning. Polls show that Hillary is the only one who can beat McCain in November. Barack is untested and doesn't have enough experience. His recent faux pas demonstrate this with stinging clarity. Unfortunately for Obama and his supporters, his days are numbered.
I think you're reading a bit much into things. He's winning...that's about it. He'll do as much "fighting", "pointless name-calling", and "rhetoric" as the next guy or girl. But he'd be a good president, which might have something to do with why he's winning.
Sheryl,
your not using information from this website correctly. Seems that you are calculating tax by multiplying entire income by tax bracket percentage. This is not how taxes are calculated.
Correctly calculated taxes:
In a nutshell, income is divided into several parts and each part is taxed at a different rate.
According to 2000 and 2007 rules, taxes for 30,000 single are determined as follows:
2000
$3,780.00 plus 28.00% of taxable income over $27,850.00 http://www.va.gov/publ/direc/finance/00ga2_02Bul.htm
2007
$747.00 plus 15.0% of taxable income over $10,120.00
http://www.va.gov/publ/direc/finance/07ga2_09bul.htm
Based on those rules
2000 tax is $4,988
2007 tax is $4,109
The net difference before and after cuts is $879, not $3,900.
Tax tables can be checked directly:
http://www.irs.gov
Link for the year of 2000:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i1040tt--2000.pdf
Correct tax values for income before deductions is listed at http://www.taxf
Dr. B, nicely done, as usual. More emotional than your usual stuff, but nice.
Bishop: You did? I'm sorry to hear that. Next time try going to a University.
Rev. got a Ph.d in Garbage Disposal
Great article Bryan. And While I do find it strange the numbers Sheryl Young threw out, I believe no one can toss us more changes than we have already had under the ring leadership of Bush!
OOPS - these figures didn't post in its original format. I had it in columns and took a chance. Odd as it may seem, The higher taxes mentioned fall under Clinton, and the lower under Bush! Anyone interested can check out that website.