So why punish BP at all?
For one, BP has what is probably the worst record in the oil business. Newsweek also says that to find the real culprits you need to look in the mirror. Apparently the magazine's viewpoint is that it doesn't matter what consumers choose to do because we are all "addicted to oil" and can't boycott all of them. But the fact of the matter is that other oil companies, such as Exxon after their oil spill, simply haven't had the dismal safety record that BP has. And BP, like many of the other oil companies, answer to their stockholders more than to their conscience. If a boycott of BP fizzles, then other oil companies won't be afraid of a boycott themselves. Already people are talking about boycotting BP, so in a way the cat is already out of the bag.
The Exxon Valdez oil spill was more of an accident than the BP oil spill given current allegations, specifically that BP cut corners and put greed over doing methodically safe oil exploration. The Exxon Valdez accident didn't happen because of greed, but because of poor policies involving drinking and driving massive oil tankers. That is what makes BP's actions all the more insidious and evil and why they should be punished through a boycott.
Another reason why a BP boycott is a good idea is because it is so easy to do and will have immediate effects on BP and other oil companies, and will pressure BP to do more to clean up the spill and face up to the true economic impact which could easily be billions of dollars. Other oil companies would take note and might review their safety procedures and environmental records.
As Harvey Keitel's character said in the first National Treasure movie regarding the theft of the Declaration of Independence, "Somebody has to go to jail Ben." BP simply has to be punished to set an example, the magnitude of the tragedy demands it. I plan on immediately beginning my personal boycott of BP.
Sources:
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/06/07/boycott-bp.html
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2010/06/07/bps-safety-record-argues-against-act-of-god-excuse/?cxntfid=blogs_jay_bookman_blog
Published by Matthew Stoker
In between working on a prequel to one of my books, (Troll's Tale, the Hunt for Thistle Wick's Spell Book), and a couple other books in production, I enjoy using Associated Content to write short humorous bi... View profile
- BP Vs. Exxon: The Oil Spill CleanupWhile BP has been less than stellar in its clean p efforts in the Gulf, they have outperformed Exxon in resources, information, and acceptance of liability.
Exxon Purchases XTO: Have We Forgotten Valdez?Twenty years ago, the Exxon Valdez grounded itself in Alaska's Prince William Sound. Today's announcement that Exxon will purchase XTO Energy Inc. makes me wonder- has Alaska ev...- Rejection Letter to Exxon/MobileI am in receipt of your pre-approved credit card offer and emphatically reject it. Exxon/Mobile is no longer approved to do business with me.
Four Florida Beaches NOT Affected by the Oil SpillThere are four beautiful beaches that won't be affected by the oil spill and will be lovely vacation spots for any family. Plan your vacation around the oil and visit one of th...
Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill: the Containment CommencesFor the first time in world history, a giant containment device is being used to stop the recent Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
- The Future Impact of the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
- The Problem with a BP Boycott
- The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Using the Truth to One's Benefit
- Exxon Valdez
- Exxon Valdez - The Aftermath
- Exxon Valdez Ruling is a Perfect Example of What is Wrong with the American Lawsuit
- Exxon Valdez in the Wrong Hands Again





2 Comments
Post a CommentActually, you're absolutely wrong on this. BP doesn't own most of the BP gas stations, they just supply them with gas. If you boycott them, you're hurting the mom and pop owners (ie: fellow Americans) and NOT BP.
I stopped buying ARCO gas, a BR company. Amoco is another. There are lots of competitors, boycott BP!