Why Can't We Fire the Entire U.S. Congress?

In breaking news, and recent chatter about debt: budgets, and other financial matters that may plague our future for generations to come. People have been marching, writing, protesting, and showing frustration plus concern to how the lives we live in America are managed. And that the economic prosperity is achievable. When leaders in congress couldn't pass or make sound choices on how to cut the debt. Or how to minimize damages on un-liquidated assets in a market exchange that favors the super-rich in terms of general taxing.

Super Rich:

We listen to the terms tax cuts, and tax credits for those whom have already earned the revenue due to profit sharing on actual receipts. As many come to figure or have a mind blowing experience about who benefit from these regulations. A tax credit for the rich normally means a paid credit that goes to actual employment. Where a business / entrepreneur would purchase a tax credit, to increase employment based on demand! And tax cuts are generally used when government doesn't want to pay for spending rendered.

When congress makes a move to give a Tax Cut, that doesn't mean they are cutting taxes: it means they are cutting funding to selected programs, and forcing these targeted areas: to either close up shop, or find funding some other place. That's what a Tax Cut really means! The notion of a Tax Cut helping the super rich is vastly wrong and remotely vague. When government orders a Tax Cut, they are not generally cutting taxes: they are refusing to pay returns on business tax returns, or individual tax subsidies.

That means, the economy falls in a mode of stagnant growth in job creation and wealth. The notion that those who are in the super rich category will invest in employment in the public sector is remotely crazy. Since a business looking to increase demands, and employment will not do so: when they can't get anything from Washington. And when the supply and demands stay stagnant - the economic wows grow. As people want to buy but can't buy because there's no money in the well.

And when the super rich gets a large break they don't need: it creates a level of uncertianty. If this mockery of the economic structure continues to loop and loom the process - nothing will break the jam on consumer confidence.

So: "How do the super rich play into this," those who occupy the 1% are in the position to hire more people. Yet, if you're a billionaire who has employed: millions of people - are you trying to falter in the middle class-with salaries that are inflated based on the scrutiny for a stand on economic wealth - plus equality.

And if you understand the whole notion of what was written, you are have way in the political process of know what an economic depression we are in. America is in a leadership depression, which has leaded into an embarrassing leadership driven recession.

Congress gave with the financial district a gift in 2009 for X-Mas with $3 Trillion in funds. $1 Trillion from T.A.R.P. and $2 trillion from the federal reserve. The idea of the FDIC and the Treasury to have $2 Trillion dollars at the choosing of our leaders; on monitoring the global and domestic concerns of the U.S and global markets, from a complete failure. Well what happened? The super rich saw trillions up on trillions of dollars, and abused the roles of capitalism for corporatism and greed - then turned around and denied the people a right to consolidate their assets.

Now people are marching in the streets, and congress can't seem to get their acts together. There are 250 of the 500 members elected to the house and senate assemblies that are now currently multi-millionaires off the dime of the public. Which means, by them being in office - resulted in them to reap in profits that they wouln't have normally consumed if they were average citizens. And this is why people are now protesting in the streets. Which is based on the singular notion of members in congress get paid more for doing less. Take a look, many of those in congress, use to be a part of (Occupy Together's 99%) yet, now because of campaign finance laws - a lot of these leaders are not millionaires. And they are passing laws, to prevent others from taking the title and office they hold. This is why the super committee has failed: it failed because of political bickering, on who will remain in their offices next year. And it failed because: R.I.P. Ted Kennedy is no-long in the mix, and making people compromise. The leadership of the congress, has failed to these: "I'VE GOT YOU MOMENTS."

I now vote and vow to through all incumbents out, and push for term limits on public offices at all levels.