Crime shows on TV are dangerous for the public because they portray a fictional depiction of what actually goes on during criminal investigations. In reality, it is a painstakingly slow process involving dozens of different specialists and investigators as well as hundreds of hours of work. Simple serology tests might take six weeks to come back from the lab, and in 2005, crime laboratories were backlogged by an estimated 750,000 cases. It is important for the public to understand the mechanisms behind forensic investigation so that they can make informed decisions in real life.
Witnesses to Crimes
One way in which crime shows on TV are dangerous for the public is when it comes to witnesses to crimes. If you are pouring yourself a cup of coffee in a convenience store when a robbery occurs, your eyewitness testimony will be valuable to the police. If you come home to find that your wife has been assaulted in your home, how you conduct yourself until the police arrive will be just as important.
A case here in Houston, Texas in 2004 involved a man who came home to find his daughter unconscious on the living room floor. By the way in which her body was positioned and other artifacts surrounding the crime scene, the man correctly guessed that his daughter had been raped. He called the police from his kitchen telephone, then began to place evidence in plastic baggies that he'd procured from his pantry. By the time the police arrived, he'd completely destroyed any physical evidence they might have been able to use later in court.
What people don't understand about crime shows on TV is the chain of custody when it comes to evidence. Before evidence can be admitted at trial, every person who handled that evidence must be documented and accounted for. If a non-professional had access to that evidence, the defense can easily have it thrown out during discovery on the basis that it is unduly prejudicial.
Jury Members
Another way in which crime shows on TV are dangerous for the public is the jury on a criminal trial. When jurors have spent the last few years watching reruns of CSI: Miami, they think they know everything in the world about forensic evidence. This makes the job of the prosecutor (and the defense) much more difficult because they have to work around the preconceived notions of the jurors.
This is further complicated because people who watch crime shows on TV believe that a multitude of evidence should be displayed at trial. In reality, very little evidence is often collected because criminals have become more attuned to forensic evidence and realize that leaving bodily fluids, finger prints and fibers can be a one-way-ticket to Death Row. Jurors are expected to make their decisions based on testimony rather than evidence, which is difficult for many to handle.
Family Members & Loved Ones
Finally, crime shows on TV are dangerous for the public because family members and loved ones of victims expect far too much of forensic and investigative professionals. When you've watched Benson and Stabler or Caine and Delko piece together perfect crimes from various types of evidence, you expect the same quick results when something happens to a loved one.
Medical examiners, police personnel and crime scene investigators are finding that they have to explain to families why things don't progress as smoothly in real life. They are accused of incompetence based on what the public sees on TV, which isn't fair and often hinders the investigation.
It is important for the public to get educated about investigations in real life. Watching crime shows on TV isn't enough, and can actually be harmful. Instead, do your research and find out how investigations are actually conducted by professionals, and you'll find a world of difference.
Published by Steve Thompson
Steve is a full-time freelance writer. In addition to the more than 3,000 articles he's written for AC, he has also written articles and other materials for more than 100 happy clients. He enjoys writing abo... View profile
- Why You Should Be Watching Court TV!In this age where reality shows are a dime a dozen, more and more people are discovering that there are some things that are stranger than life to watch - and most of them are on Court TV!
- Political Correctness Takes Hold of the Michael Richards ScandalAt the end of the day, it should be obviously clear: political correctness is taking hold of the Michael Richards scandal.
- Oprah's Snake Oil: Interview With Missouri Kidnapped Child Shawn Hornbeck Reality TV sunk to an all-time low when traumatized Missouri teen Sean Hornbeck appeared with his family on the January 19 edition of "The Oprah Winfrey Show" only days after being freed from monstrous captivity. Tawd...
- How the American Mainstream Media Has Engaged in Self-Censorship During WartimeThe coverage of war in America has changed drastically over the years. Today's journalistic standards are roughly equivalent to the way Pravda covered the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
- Top 10 TV Shows of 2006How do you exactly pick the top TV shows? The ratings change weekly, so that can only be a part of it.
- The Three Best Crime Shows on Television
- The Difference Between TV Forensics & Real Forensics
- Modern-Day Mass Media: How the Few Decide for the Whole
- Cultivation Theory and Fear in the Media
- Shortly After Angie's Story Airs on National TV, Husband Mysteriously Skips Town
- Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes.
- Homeless Problem: No Problem for Those Not Homeless





9 Comments
Post a CommentGood article. I think your ideas are very validated. I especially agree with the part about the jury. They think that there should be DNA or a smoking gun in every case and discredit the importance and circumstantial evidence.
I watch crime shows because they are interesting. I have learned that when something happens you shouldn't touch or remove anything to compromise the scene. I also learned that if you are raped, you should not take a shower or throw the clothes away. I guess with the bad you must also take the good.
Mass and fatal stupidity rests on the shoulders of the massively stupid, not television producers and writers.
Very interesting and well presented article, although I am not sure I fully agree that they are dangerous. I think they are for entertainment purposes and people should use a little common sense.
It is only entertainment, but some friends of mine who are police officers and attorneys do believe that juries are now expecting every case to have DNA, even when it's not even relevant.
Sorry. A friend was visiting and used my computer. I don't have a wife!
Sorry. A friend was visiting and used my computer. I don't have a wife!
Even if you don't watch for educational purposes,you can pick up information from shows like CSI. The wife has really become a whiz at forensics after getting inspired by CSI. Good article!
I've wondered if crime shows had this effect. Good points.