Why Are Democrats so Pro-Censorship?

Scotty Starnes
The attempts by Democrats to censor folks who have a different opinion is becoming a noise. Just this week we have Senator Jay Rockefeller wants the FCC to take Fox News and MSNBC off the air and Al Sharpton wants the FCC to shut down Rush Limbaugh. This is where you can see the difference between Republicans and Democrats.

Republicans love the constitution. Democrats constantly attempt to change it. Republicans will use the remote control when they don't like what they hear. Democrats demand censorship and want people's opinions shut down.

So much for that tolerance.

Has anyone else noticed how the left is constantly attacking our first amendment rights of free speech? Since the election of Obama, the left has constantly attacked anyone who has a different opinion than they do. Obama, and several members of his administration, have openly attacked Fox News because Fox News doesn't cater to them.

We have all this talk about 'net-neutrality' and the FCC and FTC are the talkers. This is the same FTC who recently dropped its investigation of Google who admitted to stealing people's e-mails, passwords and IP address. Since Google has deep ties with Obama, the media pretty much ignore this story. Imagine if this had been a corporation tied to Bush who admitted to invading the privacy of taxpayers.

Remember, if they control the messenger, they control the message. This has been the goal since Feb. 2009. Obama appointed czars such as Cass Sunstein and Mark Lloyd along with White House communication director, Anita Dunn, who happen to be all for government controlled media through regulations. All three are fans of socialism. Shocking, I know.

Why are these Socialist Progressive Democrats openly against free speech? It's because they are being exposed. If you control the media, you control the message and when you control the message, you can fool a lot of weak-minded individuals. Look at what the media did to get Obama elected. Imagine if they vetted Obama in the same fashion they vetted Sarah Palin.

The media covered up all the corrupt ties Obama had to Frank Marshall Davis, Rashid Khalidi, Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, Tony Rezko, Rod Blagojevich, Van Jones, SEIU, ACORN, Code Pink...so on and so forth. None of this was reported until after Obama was in office. I don't have enough time, or space, to list all the radical ties Obama has, but you get the point.

The desire to control the media is a desire to hide the truth. This is why we continue to hear all this talk about censorship and taking away people's rights to free speech and restricting the freedom of the press. Radicals are scared to be exposed and the truth does this.

To all the Progressive Socialist Democrats out there: If you don't like something you hear or see...change the channel. This is still a free country, despite all the radical things you idiots have done the past two years. America has rejected you and your radical president.

To end. If you don't like what I write...don't read my articles. Hit the X-button at the top of the page and find another author whose opinions you agree with. It really is that simple.

Published by Scotty Starnes

Hello and welcome. My name is Scotty Starnes.I am a Politically Incorrect Individual, Author, Freelance Writer and Political Blogger living in Concord, North Carolina.  View profile

5 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Sheryl Young2/1/2011

    Continuing my comment from your other article...of course, I don't know how I missed all these~!

  • LarrWayne Po1/19/2011

    Censorship is a defense shield to protect the ignorant, that can't speak with enough intelligence to win an argument.

  • Tony Jingo11/19/2010

    obviously we have their freedom-suppressing number. what I don't get is the decent folks out there giving such a radical agenda a pass...just as we extol the "peace loving Muslims" of Islam to stand up to the radicals amongst them..we need to call out the "patriotic Democrats" that are allowing their Party to be hijacked by the Marxist radicals..which also pose a threat to our Republic.

  • Scotty Starnes11/18/2010

    Thanks Mike. I've boycotted writting on AC for awhile but decided its time to come back and get my point of view out there. The Obama flock can re-educate those weak-minded folk who follow them. I think the November election was a sound rejection of the direction the Obama-Pelosi-Reid regime was taking us down.

  • Mike Hatz11/18/2010

    It's not that simple, Scotty. The 'change' they believe in isn't about the channel or the webpage, it's about your mind and soul. I have read many of these Obama people talk about the need to 're-educate' the reluctant in America; that mentality automatically precludes any notion of dissent (or even, dare I say, 'diversity'). Glad to see you put another one up, man!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.