Why Facebook Owns Your World -- and Why it Shouldn't
As Annie Leonard points out in The Story of Citizens United, the corporation is a legal fiction that's only been around for a few hundred years. And unlike governments, corporations aren't accountable to the people whose lives they affect. Especially technology corporations, because the things they're inventing are so new there aren't any laws for them.
Why this is a problem
We trust our governments with the basic needs of our society, like libraries, roads and sidewalks, public schools, and the fire department. We do this partly because it doesn't make sense to ask any one person to pay for these things, and partly because we feel it'd be wrong to make people go without.
The thing is, you need more than just library books to be able to participate in today's society. In order to find out what's going on in my neighborhood, I needed to join a website called Meetup.com. To see what's going on with my favorite brands, I needed to join Twitter. And a lot of people need to have Facebook accounts just to keep up with their friends ... or even to log in to a lot of other websites, using Facebook Connect.
If you're not on sites like Facebook and Twitter, you're left out of the conversation. It's not like not having a big-screen TV, where it's a luxury that not everyone can have. For a lot of people, it's more like not having a car. In some societies, a car would be considered a luxury. But in modern American society, it's a necessity, to hold a job or go basically anywhere. Living without one is hard -- I should know.
What do these websites have in common?
They're all run by corporations, which aren't accountable to anyone except the members of "the 1 percent" who own and invest in them.
They don't provide us free services because it's their civic duty. They do it because they've been given a lot of money by venture capitalists, to get as many people as possible on their sites. Then, once they've gotten to the point where your world literally needs them to keep going -- where people are joining because they have to, not because they want to -- they start putting in ads, and coming up with ways to sell your time and attention to other corporations.
They're not like a media company, like Yahoo!, which was sponsored by ads from the start. They're more like a legal way for corporations to buy people's friendships and public spaces, without letting you know that you're selling them. But it's not legal because they have the right to do that, like how you have the right to free speech (unless Facebook says otherwise). It's legal because not enough people understand the technology, and realize what's happening and why this is bad.
What needs to happen
People need online, public spaces. They need them the same way they need access to information. You should be able to pay for an encyclopedia set if you want, but there should always be the public libraries and Wikipedia there for free, and they should be accountable to everyone through governments and nonprofits.
Likewise, instead of just Facebook there needs to be a Wikipedia of social networking, built on principles like Dreamwidth's and open to everyone. And it needs to use open-source programming code, so that anyone can make their own, and still talk to people on other sites.
Identi.ca and Diaspora are trying to be this for Twitter and Facebook. But they have a long way to go, because the laws are on Twitter's and Facebook's sides. The big names don't have to share their programming code, or let you "friend" or "follow" people on their networks, or do anything else you'd expect of an actual person. All they have to do is deliver a return on investment.
Why this is a problem
We trust our governments with the basic needs of our society, like libraries, roads and sidewalks, public schools, and the fire department. We do this partly because it doesn't make sense to ask any one person to pay for these things, and partly because we feel it'd be wrong to make people go without.
The thing is, you need more than just library books to be able to participate in today's society. In order to find out what's going on in my neighborhood, I needed to join a website called Meetup.com. To see what's going on with my favorite brands, I needed to join Twitter. And a lot of people need to have Facebook accounts just to keep up with their friends ... or even to log in to a lot of other websites, using Facebook Connect.
If you're not on sites like Facebook and Twitter, you're left out of the conversation. It's not like not having a big-screen TV, where it's a luxury that not everyone can have. For a lot of people, it's more like not having a car. In some societies, a car would be considered a luxury. But in modern American society, it's a necessity, to hold a job or go basically anywhere. Living without one is hard -- I should know.
What do these websites have in common?
They're all run by corporations, which aren't accountable to anyone except the members of "the 1 percent" who own and invest in them.
They don't provide us free services because it's their civic duty. They do it because they've been given a lot of money by venture capitalists, to get as many people as possible on their sites. Then, once they've gotten to the point where your world literally needs them to keep going -- where people are joining because they have to, not because they want to -- they start putting in ads, and coming up with ways to sell your time and attention to other corporations.
They're not like a media company, like Yahoo!, which was sponsored by ads from the start. They're more like a legal way for corporations to buy people's friendships and public spaces, without letting you know that you're selling them. But it's not legal because they have the right to do that, like how you have the right to free speech (unless Facebook says otherwise). It's legal because not enough people understand the technology, and realize what's happening and why this is bad.
What needs to happen
People need online, public spaces. They need them the same way they need access to information. You should be able to pay for an encyclopedia set if you want, but there should always be the public libraries and Wikipedia there for free, and they should be accountable to everyone through governments and nonprofits.
Likewise, instead of just Facebook there needs to be a Wikipedia of social networking, built on principles like Dreamwidth's and open to everyone. And it needs to use open-source programming code, so that anyone can make their own, and still talk to people on other sites.
Identi.ca and Diaspora are trying to be this for Twitter and Facebook. But they have a long way to go, because the laws are on Twitter's and Facebook's sides. The big names don't have to share their programming code, or let you "friend" or "follow" people on their networks, or do anything else you'd expect of an actual person. All they have to do is deliver a return on investment.
Published by Jared Spurbeck - Featured Contributor in Technology
I'm a tabletop gamer and technology enthusiast, who is passionate about social justice and open-source software. I was also raised in the Mormon church, and enjoy bringing a former member's perspective to di... View profile
- Profiles on Social Networking Sites Prove Hazardous for Job SeekersMore often employers search prospective candidates profiles on social networking sites for any inappropriate information, which could derail opportunity for hiring or promotion.
The Power of Social Networking for BusinessMany business people are getting involved with social networking and starting to build solid quality connections. In order to succeed at social networking we must use the perso...- How to Create a Social Networking Site! You can be rich and successful using free services and never spend a dime. Become rich like the creators of MySpace and Facebook. Bank on the social networking world.
- Social Networking SitesA research paper written during a Fall 2007 semester about the effects, pros/cons, and history of social networking sites like Myspace and Facebook.
- Parents Acting as the Watchdogs on Teenagers Interacting with Social Networking We...Parents acting as the watchdogs on teenagers interacting with social networking websites like MySpace and Facebook
- Which Social Networking Site is Best for Your Small Business?
- Fanpop! - Newest Social Networking Site
- Social Networking Part 1 "You've Got a Life"
- ProfileLinker Launches and Lets Users Sync Profiles Across Social Networking Sites
- Alternative to MySpace: TagWorld Social Networking
- Caution :People Used to Social Networking Through Facebook or Orkut May Soon Find...
- Social Networking: The Fastest Growing Trend on the Internet
8 Comments
Post a CommentGood article and great point. We shouldn't let "peer pressure" force us onto Facebook or Twitter.
Great article--one key point is that any publicly owned technology company (Facebook will be joining this crowd soon) is actually owned by the 99% via 401K's and such. And as much as I would love to live in a world which did not commodify "public spaces," it won't happen. Our economic system encourages the commodification of knowledge, space, etc. One can't change that fact without significantly altering the current market economy. But there is a bright side, prior to the Internet, we might have had free access libraries; however, most knowledge was proprietary; we could not access home prices without a realtor's help, we could not obtain medical information without visiting a doctor, we needed to use a lawyer if we wanted to form a corporation, etc. Good post though... :-)
websites and business are the way they are becuase people eithere support or allow it. If you choose to be a part of it than you are supporting it. if you dont want to support it, than stay out of it and start your own site.
The only way Facebook is ever going to change, is, if the people demand it. Right now, we're still trying to figure out how all this online stuff fits into our society. It's funny, how they're making up the rules as they go. It always comes down to, whoever has the most money, wins.
Excellent article, Jared! Shared it on my Facebook wall....how's that for irony? lol
Jared, this is a great article. It reminds me of how we, the laypeople, are treated like sheep.
This is so true. I'm glad you pointed out that it's our time and attention being sold to other corporations.
// the corporation is a legal fiction that's only been around for a few hundred years. And unlike governments, corporations aren't accountable to the people whose lives they affect //
Now, if we can only get the Supreme Court and the shadow oligarchs to rethink THEIR flawed beliefs and recognize Jared's assertion, we'd go a long way in solving many of the intractable problems we now face as a society.