Why the Game of Hockey Needs Fighting: Fighting Can Never Die
How Fighting in the Game of Hockey Makes it One of the Most Unique and Honorable Sports in the World
Hockey players are known as the roughest of rough, the "salt-of-the-earth" type guys that don't mind having their top teeth missing along with some five o'clock shadow (makes the look complete). For as long as hockey has been a major sport, one of the defining elements of it is fighting. The bench clearing brawl, the payback for hitting a star, and the rare goalie fights all make hockey stand out from its rivals. So why is it that after so many years of this significant characteristic, the NHL is all but trying to abolish it? The answer first starts with the NHL's clueless commissioner, Gary Bettman, and his current reign of stupidity running the league. Dan Wetzel of Yahoo! Sports recently wrote an article marking the 15-year anniversary of his ownership of the NHL, making the comment that "[Bettman] has never figured out how to change his marketing plans to fit the product of hockey. Instead, he changed the product to fit his marketing plans". If you remember how bad an idea the glowing puck was, you understand what this comment means. Bettman doesn't seem to understand that in his quest to gain new fans, he has increasingly infuriated all the existing fans, the die hards that stayed strong throughout the lockout. One major change that he instituted that has caused the biggest ruckus is the instigator penalty. It is with this one small move that he has begun to change the face of the game and possibly it's entire future.
If you watched hockey back in the day and up to 2004 (the lockout wiped out the 2004-05 season), the last 5-10 minutes were what everyone was waiting for. Frustrations ran high for the team that was down, aggressions were mounting as teams jockeyed for the upper hand, and paybacks were handed out for taking a run at a star player. It was these situations that fueled the excitement of the game and made you stay till the very last horn, because who knows what might happen. Now, if your team is up, you can head towards your car in those final ticks because you know nothing is going to happen. The instigator rule states that a player who is deemed to be the instigator of an altercation in the final five minutes of regulation time or at any time in overtime, shall be given an instigator minor penalty, a major for fighting, a ten minute misconduct and an automatic one-game suspension. The length of suspension will double for each subsequent offense. In addition, the player's coach shall be fined $10,000 -- a fine that will double for each subsequent incident. So to sum it up, the coach can't send out the enforcers to regulate, the star players are at risk because some idiot out there can smoke him and know he won't get any retaliation, and the fans get a very unexciting end product. Bettman, however, didn't care when he instituted this rule, because instead of thinking about the tradition and integrity of the game, his eyes lit up with dollar signs with the thought of marketing the skill players. In doing this, he effectively ended the careers of players such as Krzysztof "The Polish Hammer" Oliwaand ending any chance for players like Brandon Sugden to get his shot at the NHL. Hockeyfights.com did an interview with Sugden in which he stated "it's [the instigator penalty] a stupid rule because that obviously leaves room for idiots to pick fights or beat up on goal scorers and not have to worry about repercussions. I hate it when it's 3 minutes left in the game and it's like 6-0 and my fans are leaving the building. Back in the old days, my fans would all pile into the building at that time because they knew that's when all the fights were going to happen". The majority of hockey fans agree with Sugden, and the days of the "policeman" look to be fading all too fast.
What the league never took in to account was "what do the fans want?" Instead of asking they assumed and somehow decided that to get a casual fan to swing to devoted, that they needed to cut out as much rough stuff as possible. The reoccurring comment throughout the fan nation is the same: in trying to gain the new fans, the NHL is neglecting the one's who have always been there! Instead of focusing on the heart of the sport, Bettman centered on what he thought would sell, and while the product has become more exciting offensively, it has become a side show to the 3 other major sports, even losing ground to NASCAR. One sport the league could have easily taken a not from is the National Lacrosse League and Major League Lacrosse, both of which garnered much attention during the lockout. Lacrosse promotes the rough-stuff, even condoning it during games with fighting and liberal usage of the stick to defend against opponents. It has gone from a little known past time to a national sport gaining network coverage, major sponsorship, and fans coming out in droves for an exciting product. Watch the next NLL game on Versus and check out how many fans are in the arena. On some nights it rivals what you would find in many NHL arenas on any given night.
There is hope for us who relish the fisticuffs though. With all these new changes, players must become more complete, better skaters, and not a defense liability. Conditioning is more important then ever and the fighters that understand this and work at it will have their spot. Players like Chris Neil, Brendan Morrow, and Ryan Clowe are all more than willing to throw down the gloves, but all of them are able to score goals, making passes, and be defensive assets in their own end. Furthermore, youngsters like Dion Phaneuf and Shea Weber throw thunderous checks nightly and fight when necessary, but are among the most steady defensemen on their teams. Even golden boy Sidney Crosby throws checks and sticks up for himself, refusing to be pushed around. These players and others prove that whether Bettman or fighting abolitionists like it, fighters will not go away. Still need proof of the immortal fighters mentality? Look no further then the Rangers v. Capitals games, when Brendan Shanahan, 38 years young and leading his team in goal scoring took on tough-guy Donald Brashear for taking liberties with another Ranger. Shanahan is not counted on to fight yet as a hockey player he felt it was his duty to stick up for his teammate. That is the loyalty and selflessness you find in the game, and it is the reason why fighting will not die unless the NHL dies with it and until that happens, we the loyal will keep the hockey fight alive in our hearts.
Published by Joe Law
Joe grew up in Southwest MI and eventually went to and graduated from Western Michigan University. He has lived everywhere imaginable in the Midwest. Currently he resides in Saint Joseph, MI with his dog Go... View profile
A Girl's Guide to Ice HockeyIncludes terms, definitions, and a basic overview of the game of ice hockey. - NHL HybridThe NHL needs to change. Players are getting suspended for dirty words and biting, and now teams will look at a proposition to ban fighting all together. Changing the game and rules may be the only solution.
- Marketing Plans - What's the Big Deal?This article explains the importance of marketing plans to small businesses.
- Summer Street Hockey: Tips for Organizing an Exciting Game of HockeyI give some advice on how to organize a game of summer street hockey.
- A Beginner's Guide to Hockey TermsFor those new to the game of hockey, this article describes some of the more confusing terms in the sport.
- Fighting in the Game of Hockey
- The Year of the American Sports Commissioner
- How to Get Your Child into the Game of Hockey
- Another Look at the Game of Hockey
- Why Soccer Isn't Exciting to Americans
- Marketing Plans: The Framework for Organizational Marketing
- A Dictionary of Hockey Terms
- The Hockey Fight
- How Bettman is trying to Ruin the Game
- Why it Stays Alive


7 Comments
Post a Commentoh, and the comment about the last 5 minutes - I definitely agree, I would rather watch OT or a shootout instead of hacking at the end of a blowout, but I can also say that, as a hockey player, if your getting blown out (and this really goes for any sport), your emotions start to get the best of you and tempers begin to flare. Take baseball: pitcher is getting lit up, guys smokes another homerun, and the next pitch is at a guys head. So wheres the difference? Football: team is getting blown out, and after the whistle, one extra little shove, hit, etc., and people start getting pissed...do I wish the "bench clearing brawl" would come back? No, thats a mockery and a spectacle. But do I miss the days where the instigator didnt exist and guys were held accountable for their actions? Damn right I do
Sorry guys who disagree with me, thats your opinion, but in all reality, it's a necessity to hockey. The only reason the NCAA players dont fight is because the wear full cages and it isn't allowed...I have watched plenty of college hockey and I have many fights - they just aren't drop-the-gloves and go toe-to-toe fights. It's about accountability, and knowing some cheap shot won't run your best player because no one will make him pay. Case in point, Marian Gaborik went to the Rangers front office and pleaded his case that they go sign Derek Boogaard simply because when Gaborik was in Minnesota, he could play with all his skill and speed and not worry about a Matt Cooke taking him out and getting just a few penalty minutes...I totally agree that fighting is sometimes not needed when I guy has his head down and gets cleanly hit - then its just retaliation. But the thing is that there are too many ways to injure another player in hockey without the ref seeing it, s
"If you watched hockey back in the day and up to 2004 (the lockout wiped out the 2004-05 season), the last 5-10 minutes were what everyone was waiting for. Frustrations ran high for the team that was down, aggressions were mounting as teams jockeyed for the upper hand, and paybacks were handed out for taking a run at a star player." Wouldn't you rather see a comeback to force overtime and/or get the win? If it's a blowout, DEAL WITH IT! Don't be such a whiny wuss who can't take it like a man. Learn from what happened and get motivated for next time.
Continued from previous comment: Players don't feel the need to push, shove, and cross-check every time the goalie freezes the puck. That being said, it doesn't take away from the physical part of the game. (It may even help it, because instead of taking cheap shots, players opt only to make big, clean hits.) Back to the crappy NHL refs, why don't they call cheap shots? Eliminate goons, penalize the jackasses who take cheap shots, as well as ordinary penalties that occur over the course of a game. As a fan, while some fights are entertaining to watch, I'd rather see my team on a power play while the offending player sits helpless in the penalty box. Also: player who fight because they took a clean hit are wussies in my book.
Two words: College Hockey. Watch some NCAA Division 1 Hockey. It's hockey at a very high level, with lots of big hits, and fighting isn't tolerated because the players don't turn into ego-centric idiots when they step on to the ice. I don't understand when NHL players fight because they took a clean shoulder check. Then they pretend to be tough by fighting. The NHL's officiating is a joke. The referees see dirty plays in front of them and think, "oh, they can just fight about it." It makes a complete mockery of this great sport, a sport that I love to watch and play. If they penalize fights more heavily, they will still happen, just like in other sports. But it will only happen when it really matters. Instead, players just fight as a sideshow to the action. They want to make it look like they are actually doing something to help the team. Coincidental majors don't help the team.
again, watch college hockey. Players don't feel the
i take pride when my friends jaws drop and drool at the awesome spectacle of a sport where men can settle things like men... as opposed to say, *cough* basketball.
Great article, I agree, fighting is intertwined with the spirit of hockey.