I watched this mom pushing her cart around the produce aisle, her small child sitting quietly in the front of the cart. Every now and then the child would begin to say something and quickly be reprimanded. When her little arm would reach for something, it would be roughly swatted away. Meanwhile, my feisty little 4 yr old was running circles around my forward moving cart, errantly grabbing up items and replacing them-occasionally in their original places. Needless to say, she was not using her "inside" voice! We passed the other mom-moments after pulling back a rapidly wagging finger just a couple millimeters from her child's nose-and from between clenched teeth I heard, "You should get control of your kid!" Being a young mother and therefore all knowing, I stopped and with hands on hips snottily replied, "I don't have to control my child; I'm teaching her SELF control!"
I have never forgotten the few words I exchanged with the grocery store mom that day. I had truly been bothered with the level of micromanaging that poor child had to endure. From then on, I began to see more and more cases of micromanagement, and fewer cases of responsible, happy children.
As a teacher, I've seen parents hovering over their children attempting to control everything they do, from how they chase the soccer ball, to how they form the letter H. I've known children to be grounded for not completing their homework or for staying too long at a friend's house. I've known parents who would spend hours every day making sure schoolwork was done correctly and then be furious with the teacher when her child didn't perform well enough on a test. These helicopter parents are great at managing other people lives, but unfortunately, they are raising children who are unable to manage their own.
I knew, from early on, that if I wanted my children to grow up to be confident, happy people, I would have to help them learn the lessons of life by experiencing them. Instead of nagging them about putting socks on before going to school, I would share my thoughts about it and quickly drop it. When my son would come home from school crying about the ribbing he got from classmates over his smelly feet, I would be genuinely sympathetic and again share my ideas on the many advantages to wearing socks. Instead of riding my daughter about studying for a big test, I would simply ask if she had any studying she needed to do. When she would bring home a bad grade on a spelling test, I would, of course, express genuine sympathy, and go on to explain why I value studying and how it made a difference in my school grades. These loving and logical approaches to discipline seemed to empower my children. It gave them ownership of their problems and the solutions for those problems. It allowed them to take responsibility for their own failures and successes and helped them to see that they were responsible, powerful, and capable people.
By hovering over their children, helicopter parents are robbing them of the most important character building experiences. Helicopter parents hold themselves --and others --responsible for their children's successes and failures. They are so afraid their children will be mistreated or will make poor decisions, that they must intervene in every aspect of their lives. Unfortunately, mom and dad will not always be there. Then who will make the decisions?
Yes, my children are different. They are strong. They are capable. They are able to make decisions on their own. Despite all their grocery-store antics, they have become responsible adults, and without any hovering at all!
Published by svacinaf
Recently reintegrated into American life after living in Italy, I have a degree in English and Elementry Education. View profile
- If You Don't Care About Plot, Characters, Pacing, Dialogue, and Logic, Then Kill B...The series continues, but if you are wise, you won't
Natural and Logical Consequences as Discipline - A Method for ParentsExplanation and examples of Natural and Logical Consequences method of discipline. Definition of discipline. Results of raising children with this method.- Helicopter Parenting: Finding a Balance Between Overinvolved and SupportiveHelicopter parenting isn't getting a lot of positive attention from the media. What is this new parenting style, is it as detrimental as it sounds, and what can other parents learn from watching helicopter parents?
- Overview and Analysis of Writing from the Subconscious -The Art of Fiction by Ayn...Biography of philosopher, screenwriter, and novelist Ayn Rand, including analysis and opinions germane to Chapter One of her monograph: The Art of Fiction. Tied in are theories of Sigmund Freud and Josef Breuer.
- Love and Reasoning-Suffering and the Wrong Person When your feelings contradict your reasoning you must look at your present reality without letting your feelings elude you and also, without letting your cold rationalism decide everything based only on what should be...
- Helicopter Parents Hover Too Closely Over Their Kids' Lives, Say Experts
- Helicopter Parents - When is Enough Enough?
- Helicopter Parents: We all Know Them
- Do Helicopter Parents Help or Harm Kids?
- Are Helicopter Parents Bad?
- Vegetarian Thanksgiving Recipes: Turkey Day, Vegetarian Style
- Teenagers, a Guide and Resource to Parenting a Troubled Teen




3 Comments
Post a CommentI think we're going from one extreme (overparenting) to the other extreme (underparenting). The key here should be balance. It looks like the author doesn't want to impose too much from her kids or expect too much, but parents are there to teach their kids discipline. Kids who are left to run around and scream in a grocery store will just think this is normal if not reprimanded. Again, balance should be the key here.
What the author is talking about isn't letting children run free, but teaching them about consequences. The point is that if a parent is there to tell the child what to do and not do they learn to just follow orders and not about consequences. These children then don't know how to make the right decision when the parents are not there to tell them what to do. This also makes them give in to peer pressure a lot easier. In a real life situation, a child that thinks about consequences and learns to be strong may say no to a friend that insists they try a drug, but the child who is raised to not speak up will be too timid to resist and will follow their peers orders just like they do with their parents. That is the type of thing I saw in the school grounds growing up. The children from strict parents would get in the most trouble, while the ones taught to be strong were more likely to know the right decision to make. These kids in turn were the ones most likely to become the judges
The helicopter parenting view is over the top child pampering. The authors approach to child rearing takes no consideration for other people's rights or feelings. Her children are not learning to respect others, but to worship themselves. She is right that their parents will not be around to tell them what to do when they are grown. Judges, Police and other authorities will be though. This liberal approach to child rearing is another anti-God approach to parenting. Some of this mother's ideas are creative and kind, but she must remember, "Where other people's rights begin, her and her children's rights end. Teaching obedience and respect for authority must begin in the home. This mother could end up in prison during her children's teenage years for crimes they might commit. Maybe not, but this kind of approach to parenting is one of the big problems in America today.