Why I'm Switching from Windows to the Mac

From a Long Time, Hardcore Windows User

Todd Eastman
I've been using personal computers all my adult life. I was even a beta tester for Windows 286. That's right, way back in the days when Apple was the only ones with a graphical user interface (GUI), Microsoft, the reigning champion of MS-DOS, decided to give the GUI a try. The result was Windows 286. In truth it was nothing more than a GUI that rode on top of MS-DOS, and it did a pretty poor job of it. There weren't any Windows applications at all, just DOS programs that you might or might not get to work under Windows 286. Back then, Lotus 1-2-3 was the leading spreadsheet, and WordPerfect was the reigning word processing software. Neither needed a GUI - they both worked perfectly with keyboard commands.

As the years went by, I worked with every version of Microsoft Windows ever released. Back then, I was so optimistic about the future of personal computers. Like most PC users, I panned the Apple as nothing more than an expensive toy, right along with Commodore and Atari. For me, it was MS Windows or nothing. I was working in IT, recommending and using nothing but MS Windows based systems. I was convinced that we would quickly see the day when we could give commands to our PC with nothing more than a verbal command. We could ask any question, and our PC (with a wide selection of voices to choose from) would give us the answer. Just like on the TV series "Star Trek".

But as the years kept going by and the various versions of MS Windows came and went, I began to become skeptical. Each upgrade seemed to cause more headaches than they solved. Every single version I have ever tried has, at one time or another, crashed and burned. I've lost data due to these crashes. There are never good explanations as to what caused them to crash. It would simply reboot itself or give you the "blue screen of death" which I challenge anyone to make any sense of. I've long since given up on ever getting any support from Microsoft. Yet still, I held out hope. I bought faster, more powerful computers. I upgraded them to make them even faster and more powerful. Then I would hand off the old PC to someone else and buy myself a brand-new top of the line PC. Brand new, out of the box, with a pre-installed version of Windows, I was able to make the PC crash without much effort. Then there are the multitude of viruses and security holes that seem to plague Windows. Sometimes it seems like Microsoft releases a new security update every week. Apple's products are nearly immune to these viruses and malware.

Still, I stuck with Microsoft. Everyone knows that the MS Windows world offers a vast amount of software to choose from, while the Apple had only a few. PC users would complain that Apple's computers were designed so that regular people would never be able to pop them open and swap out parts or upgrade them on their own. Worst of all, everyone knows that Apples are more expensive. A lot more expensive. So I passed on the Macintosh and all that was Apple.

I even passed on the now famous iPod, assuming that MP3 players designed to work with any PC and numerous software players had to be better than the iPod. That was a huge mistake on my part. If I could turn back time, I would have an iPod instead of what I bought for almost the same amount of money.

Then one day, I noticed an eBay offering. A near mint condition 12 inch PowerBook G4, with upgraded RAM and hard drive. I was completely surprised when my low bid won that auction, and even more surprised when that PowerBook arrived, in the original packaging, and looking like it had never been used. I was ecstatic! Of course, this laptop was made prior to Apple jumping over to the Intel chips, but I figured it would give me something to tinker with, and a first hand look at how Mac OS X (ten) really worked. So I tinkered and played and explored. Guess what I discovered? That little PowerBook could do everything my PC could do, and then some. It has never once crashed on me, or given me any problems. Connecting it to my home network was a breeze. I still have trouble with an older Windows based laptop that doesn't want to play nice on my network. This coming from what is considered an out of date model, with the release of Apple's new line of Intel processor based Macs. The selection of software is much larger than I expected, and most of the primary Windows applications are now available in Mac versions too. The Mac loads the OS much faster than Windows, and it runs programs perfectly well for me. I can't even imagine what the new , even faster ones are like.

Apple's iLife software suite is fantastic, and Microsoft offers nothing even close to it. The iLife suite comes with the Mac, allowing you to design web sites, create your own podcast, edit a movie and burn it to DVD, organize your digital photo album, and even make music with GarageBand. Sure, you can put together your own suite of Windows applications to get the same functionality, but iLife is just so easy to understand and use, with a consistent user interface across the board. Updates and upgrades are presented automatically, and install easily with minimum fuss. Mac OS X is miles ahead of Windows XP Professional that I use now. Microsoft plans to release their latest version of Windows, "Windows Vista" early in 2007. But as a Windows user, I am completely under-whelmed by what it promises. As far as I can tell, they are simply playing catch-up with Apple. Where's the innovation? What about security? What about sexy female (or male) voices answering our every need while we give commands by voice? Okay, so neither company offers that yet. But if anyone is going to do it, I have to put my money on Apple as being the first ones to accomplish it.

My current PC is relatively new, with a Pentium D, lots of RAM and hard disk space, and other little gadgets. But already I have questions about whether it will even run Windows Vista. The Intel based Macs can now run Windows and Windows applications. Why can't I run Mac OS X on my PC if I choose? Since it appears that my PC is rapidly becoming obsolete, and Vista doesn't offer me a lot of incentive to stick around, I have come to a decision. My next PC will be from Apple. Sorry lads, but I'm jumping ship too!

Published by Todd Eastman

Todd is a freelance writer, photographer, web designer and graphics designer based in Sonoma County, CA., the heart of America's "Wine Country." He also dabbles in various forms of art and tries to play gui...  View profile

  • Mac OS X beats Windows XP hands down.
  • When comparing the two, compare reliability and features too.
  • iLife rocks!
Windows 286, aka Windows 2.11 was released in the late 1980's. Windows 1.03 was released in 1985. Apple's first GUI was called "Lisa" and was released in 1983, at least 2 years before Microsoft's first attempt.

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • SVEN9/20/2010

    The problem with windows is that it runs on a POS comCRAP or dell. remove the middleman, go to newegg, spec out the intel processor, intel mobo, crucial or viking memory, a WD hard drive, and the latest version of windows 7 and you will see no crashes, loss of data, etc. Remember you get what you pay for, the difference with mac is that you overpay for everything so where is the incentive to switch. I'll take my Panasonic CF-30 toughbook with XP SP3 any day over a Mac, after is beating you with performance, in 100 degree heat, I'll smash it with my "real" built-in handle.

  • Cowicide12/7/2009

    " ... As a business user though, I always say, "Get those toys out of my way, I've got work to do." ... "

    That's funny, that's exactly what I say when I shove aside piece of crap Windows machines and get to work with my Macs.

    Sounds like you are ignorant of the platform and your wifey's computer is screwed up (sounds like you messed with it not knowing what you are doing?).

    How do I know you don't know what you are doing? Your comment about malware and viruses. If Apple isn't a "big enough target to make it worth the effect - Yet" then how do you explain the scores of viruses for Mac OS 9 that you now don't find in Mac OS 10 now that Apple's marketshare is much higher? HINT: UNIX based... open source... hint hint..

    Your ignorance is showing.

  • Gene Smith11/5/2009

    I have a windows machine for gaming but thee important stuff goes on my imac. All my business records and photo's.

    Since winds is absolutely famous for their crash and burn policy, losing all record's.
    Never crashed on an update with the mac, so I am having a real hard time swalling that.

  • Larry Rouse10/13/2009

    Mac is not immune to malware and viruses - they just aren't a big enough target to make it worth the effort - Yet. My wife has a Mac thoughtfully provided by the school board and it is a nightmare to work with. It has to be goaded into communicating with the rest of the network, crashes every time they try to update it, and is not compatible with most of the software they already own; but they can't buy fully compatible software because it doesn't exist.
    If you're a consumer level user and you like that Mac, stick with it. As a business user though, I always say, "Get those toys out of my way, I've got work to do."

  • anonymous8/27/2009

    I think that if msft was it's own manufacturer then they might come close to Mac, but Mac in my opinion is way better. When it comes to speed mac is flawlesss. I have a pismo that runs tiger flawlessly on a 440 mhz cpu

  • Anonymous12/27/2006

    Yeah, every version of Windows has higher system requirements and is slower than the last. My computer is less than two years old but it doesn't meet the absurd memory requirement for Windows Vista. So much more could be accomplished if programmers still cared about efficiency, which most of them seem to have forgotten about in the mid-'90s.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.