Why Do You Not Demand an Answer About 9/11 Mysteries?
A 'Shout-Out' to America - 'PATRIOTISM!'
All over the Internet, questions are being asked, and in turn, eyebrows are being raised by those innocently ignorant to scientific probability on that fateful day we call 9/11. Those unknowingly following the media, the leaders of the modern world, and the majority beliefs sometimes become comfortable in their happy lives, forgetting that this country was birthed by radicals. The idea of a free country was created by a desire for the freedom to ask questions and freely form personal opinions. It was empowered by the courage of those who wanted change.
Let us walk a step beyond "Fahrenheit 9/11." As a matter of fact, if you have not viewed the controversial movie, skip it entirely. The questions and unrest you will experience after visiting 911weknow.com or 911Mysteries.com may not allow you time to view it, anyhow.
I am not an expert in anything making me capable of stating an opinion on what brought down the World Trade Centers on September 11, 2001. I am an average (well, close to average) American female, thirty-six years of age, who happens to love her country and fellow countrymen. But there are people who are experts and who have already stated what can only logically be decided upon by me as "something other than the terrorist planes brought down the Twin Towers." The questions which rose in my mind on that day of terrible shock and awe are the same questions which now I demand to be answered. They are as follows:
Official Story
"It was the combination of the impact load doing great damage to the building, followed by the fire, that caused the collapse (W. Gene Corley, Ph.D, American Society of Civil Engineers)."
Unofficial Story
Les Robertson, a structural engineer who designed the streamlined steel frames in the 1960's, stated that the designers of the Twin Towers kept in mind that there may one day be a plane, lost in the fog, crashing into one of the Towers. Frank A. DeMartini, Manager, WTC Construction and Program Management states, "The building was designed to have a fully loaded, 707, the largest plane at that time, crash into it. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jet liners."
So I Ask You, Pres
Only one hour after impact, the first tower, which was actually hit by the second plane, fell completely to the ground in ten seconds. One-hundred and ten stories dropped straight down in ten seconds. That's faster than gravity's pull, folks. There was no resistance of any kind between floors, and those floors even having yet to have been touched by the presumably "hot enough to melt steel" jet-fuel fire which FEMA stated was mostly consumed by the initial fireballs in the following few minutes after impact. So, My American Leader, I ask you this: if much of the fuel in the planes, jet-grade kerosene, was consumed within the first few minutes of impact, how on God's Great Earth was this somehow enough to bring down the Twin Towers' 47 column steel core, 236 exterior columns, and thousands of steel trusses, all at the same time, with no resistance between floors - in ten seconds?
So I Ask You, Pres
Why have I never seen any of these reports, or anything remotely close to the evidence initiated by these studies spreading like wildfire on the Internet while traveling through concerned citizens, on television? Why no briefings or new investigations? Why was there more money spent on the investigation into Clinton's sex life than on the events of 9/11?
So I Ask You, Pres
Why did Rudy Giuliani believe the Twin Towers were both going to collapse when so many other trained firemen did not? He was quoted, cited, and recorded as stating as much, the recording being played on the 911weknow.com site in the 9/11 Mysteries full-length movie. Why does he not address the 9/11 questions being raised throughout the country now - especially during his campaign?
And So I Ask You, America
Are you going to stay in comfortable denial about the questionable, illogical reports about the thousands who died on September 11, 2001? Are you going to keep on believing the impossible scenario that some brilliant comic-book-like villain overseas could have masterminded a plot that made two durable skyscrapers fall, both in a detonation style, within a country that prides itself with security such as America? Are you going to keep overlooking the immeasurable costs it would have taken to rid the Towers of Asbestos, in order to bring them both up to the Asbestos Codes of the 80's? Are you going to overlook how much money the Towers were costing America in general?
Watch the video. Think for yourself. What would happen if the 2008 election polls were "boycotted," in a sense? Demand answers. It's still your right, if it's still your country. And I know America still belongs, in part, to me and my future descendants. Does she belong to you and yours, as well?
"Let's roll."
Published by Jeanne Sparks-Carreker
Convicted felon, reformed drug trafficker, disenfranchised from society by the government. I spend most of my time creating ways to educate non-users about drug addiction, so that addicts are understood and... View profile
President Bush and "The War on Terror"My personal views on President Bush's War on Terror and how the funds spent on his war effort could have been put to better use elsewhere.
The War on Terror: Protesting the Liberation of IraqPopular view on Cindy Sheehan and her "cause". The building of dreams for the Iraqi people. The war on terror and what it stands for.- World Trade Center: Movie Review and so Much MoreA movie review and some other thoughs about Oliver Stone's World Trade Center.
What the Democrats Don't Understand About the War on TerrorBy criticizing President Bush over the hunt for Bin Laden, and by calling for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the Democrats demonstrate that they don't understand the purpos...
Why the "War on Terror" is WrongIntended as a rebuttal to Greg Reesons article, What the Democrats Don't Understand about the War on Terror. I contend that the "war on terror" is wrong. It is wrong because the...
- The World Trade Center Health Registry Re-Surveys 9/11 Survivors Beginning June 1,...
- The World Trade Center - from Loss to Rebirth
- World Trade Center Memorial Foundation Get Closer to Its Goal
- World Trade Center Building 7 and Financial Markets
- Bush vs. Iraq: How the war on terror became a war on Iraqi human rights
- World Trade Center Hits You Where it Hurts
- War on Terror
- All over the Internet, questions are being asked about 9/11.
- 110 stories dropped straight down in ten seconds. That's faster than gravity's pull, folks.
- "Let's roll."
12 Comments
Post a Comment(continnued)
Just to clarify, my post below is not a criticism directed at you but at the way a debate can be skewed by the way it is presented in an environment where there is very little objectivity or balance.
Have a good day.
(continued)
..tons of jet fuel on a weakened building with steel fire protection removed. There are court cases all the time where there are expert witnesses for the defence and expert witnesses for the prosecution, coming to different conclusions and sometimes contradicting each other. I am not an American but I have to say it dismays me sometimes to see the way in which this whole debate is conducted on the internet with a one-sided polemic being put forward 24/7 - it's not good for rational assessment of evidence or, I think, for truth.
Hi Jeanne,
I tried to reply to you a while ago but it didn't appear - I'll try again. In my opinion the internet is responsible for disseminating a lot of misleading and spurious information on the subject of 911 and presenting it in a pejorative distorted way to people who assume it to be otherwise. There are any number of details and questions that could be addressed about this but just to take your first point about an engineer giving his assessment of why the WTC towers collapsed followed by a statement by someone who designed the towers and who took into account a 707 lost fog hitting the building. Ask yourself was this ever tested, until 911? The engineers who designed the Titanic said it was unsinkable. The Tacoma Narrows bridge was designed not to fall down in a strong wind. A Boeing 767 travelling at 3 times the speed of that Boeing 707 has 9 times the kinetic energy. The towers did survive the impact - those designing it did not take into account a subsequent fire fed by ton
The questions I had in the article, for the most part, have not been answered for me, no, C, though I am definitely open for suggestion and opinion. I stated in the article, "I am not an expert in anything making me capable of stating an opinion on what brought down the World Trade Centers...." And still I am not completely sure we have the answer as to whom. Thanks for commenting :) Have a good week!
Probably a bit late to be commenting on your article but I just wonder if, a couple of years later, you views have altered in any way from those you expressed in that article.
If anything, Alyce, there was prior knowledge of the terrorist threats, we know that. As for ever being given an answer, I don't believe the elected leaders will actually give it up. People wonder why some do not trust their government's version or official story during an event... to me, the stupidity would lie in remaining blind and trusting our US leaders. Yes, I know about #7, and have wondered myself why Kerry said it was collapsed detonation style by New York... hmmmm.... thanks for commenting :)
Unless I missed it you didn't mention the WTC building #7 that collapsed in an identical manner as the towers. But it was not hit by a plane. If we go back in history to the late 1800's we may have some questions answers in regards to the Bush clan. My clear memory of "911" from 3,000 miles away was repeated newscasts about bombs going off. If Luis Miranda is correct, that explains everything.
Thanks for commenting, Ranger, and let me say that I completely understand the points you made. I didn't want to look into this when I first heard about it, and actually did not watch the most popular movie about this that Oprah produced (not sure I'm right about the role Oprah played in it, however). Sir, schoolchildren do not understand fully how great an undertaking it is to bring down two skyscrapers. And as for a terrorist, I would no sooner believe Al Qaeda's BS than I would the devil himself. But this does not take away from the fact that jet-grade fuel supposedly burned hot enough to melt not only the structure/core/trusses in the upper floors, after having been consumed already, but also the lower floors - 110 stories, Ranger, that it did not touch. Hurricane, plane resistant (to a degree) buildings - two of them - within a couple of hours? What makes me susceptible to lingering unanswered questions? I'm American, Ranger. This common thread unites us, and no disagreement over
Osama Bin Laden has taken credit for the attacks on numerous occassions. Muslim schoolchildren days before the attacks, pointed to the Twin Towers from their classroom windows and told the teacher that they would soon fall. The real question here is - what is it about you (and so many other americans) that makes you susceptible to the most outlandish of propaganda pushed out by the enemies of freedom to divide us? To a terrorist, telling lies to an infidel is a virtue.
Thank you for your comments, Jeff, Luis, and Jaleh :)
Luis, I appreciate very much your insight and information. I will follow up on it immediately. Now my question is this: Why do we let this happen? I don't care if it has been an even remotely acceptable practice. It stops here and now, with my generation. It stops because people like me will no longer tolerate it. It stops however and with whatever it takes to stop it. My children and grandchildren deserve a true freedom, free of the potential fear that a government can and will do whatever they want. They deserve it, and they will not be lied to and told they have it.