Why Nuclear Power Plants Are Not a Threat in America
Even Though it Scares, Nuclear Power is Truly Not a Threat to American Society
However, in American society nuclear power is actually very safe, and is contained well under the supervision of trained professionals, and are heavily secured by private security. There are many different security methods to deter acts of destruction against a nuclear power plant such as armed officers, containment towers, surveillance cameras, sensor alarms, and much, much more. The security necessary is somewhat due to the amount of fear associated with nuclear power plants from the media and other sources. Security is there to deter extremists whom would try to destroy the nuclear power plant, or hurt it in any other way. Also, one other way that nuclear power plants secure a nulcear reactor is to submerge it in water, which also helps cool the nuclear reactor as well.
Nuclear power plants essentially use Uranium, a non-weapons grade source to help fuel their nuclear power plant. Uranium is also very heavily abundant in their resources, and it 500 times more common than gold according to Wikipedia. The fuel source that people are essentially afraid is plutonium, a weapons-grade element that we are actually of search in Iraq as we speak right now.
Another threat people take to nuclear power plants aside from terrorist or extremist attacks are economic costs. Nuclear power plants do in fact cost a large sum of money to build. Yet, the costs for a nuclear power plant are actually lower than it would be to essentially run a coal-fuelled or gas-fuelled plant instead.
Nuclear power is also heavily checked before use by a government agency known as the NRC, or Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission looks at many different aspects of the nuclear power industry they are currently looking at. Some aspects include the reactors, the wastes, and the transportation of exportations and importations to or from the nuclear power plant. There are specific and strictly interpreted rules that nuclear power plants must comply to in order to keep their nuclear power plant running.
There have been some incidents regarding nuclear power, but hasn't there always been some sort of incident when regarding something with such a high amount of power, both in energy and other fields as well? One of the incidents took place in Chernobyl on April 26, 1986. Chernobyl is located in the Soviet Union, and this disaster took place since the Soviet Union did not comply with regulations and had flaws in the reactors design. Over all, this took place in the Soviet Union, and we are merely discussing nuclear power in regards to the U.S.
Also, you know those huge towers that most people think of when you think of a nuclear power reactor? Those towers are in fact not nuclear reactors! Those towers are cooling towers to help cool the nuclear reactor, as well as contain them. The nuclear reactor itself is much small and is contained inside of these towers, which is heavily guarded by armed officers (usually), and other security precautions such as alarms and surveillance cameras.
An added bonus to having a nuclear power plant in your city is that it may also put more money into the school district and town in general. Such an example is Wading River on Long Island, where the company that essentially owned the power plant pumped $12 million into the school district. The power plant, however, never opened up due to protests.
So, as long as the NRA is regulating the use of nuclear power by these nuclear power plants, you have nothing to worry about. Nuclear power is so powerful it can power whole cities, and it costs less over time to operate when compared to a coal-fulled plants and gas-fuelled power plants. There is no reason, other than the media circus, to be afraid of nuclear power. And we all now how the media distorts even the most of common things.
Published by Andrew Berry - Featured Contributor in Technology
Andrew Berry has acquired his Fire Fighter 1 Certification from the Yaphank Fire Academy and is currently an active volunteer firefighter in a department residing in Suffolk County, NY. He has also earned hi... View profile
- Senator Hillary Clinton Warns of Dangers at Indian Point Nuclear Power PlantNew York Senator Hillary Clinton has been concerned about the safety of the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant ever since 9/11.
- Nuclear Power Plants in the Southeastern United States May Need to Shut Down24 of the nation's 104 nuclear power plants are located in the areas currently experiencing the most severe drought levels. What are the implications for consumers?
- Nuclear Power Rises to the OccasionAccording to the Nuclear Energy Institute, American nuclear power plants operated at an average daily capacity factor of better than 98% over the first 14 days of August.
- Global Warming: Real Science FictionMan-made global warming doesn't exist, simply because it is impossible to achieve.
Perry Nuclear Power Plant in Ohio Re-Opens After OutagePerry Nuclear Power Plant Facility re-opens after 30-ton motor installation.
- 34 New Nuclear Power Plants Could Go Online in the Next Decade
- Nuclear Power Industry and Upcoming US Election
- The Dangerous Side of Nuclear Power Plants
- Nuclear Power in America
- Developing Nuclear Power as Alternative Energy
- Are the Nuclear Power Plants in Your Area Vulnerable?
- Are New Nuclear Power Plants a Good Idea?
- Nuclear power isn't as scary as it seems.
- Nuclear power plants may cost less to service compared to other types of power plants.
- Energy companies may even help pump money into the cities economy, including the school district.


5 Comments
Post a CommentSo if Uranium is used to create nuclear power, it is not harmful, should there be an accident? A major earthquake, could cause a power plant accident, as we have just seen in Japan. I guess I can do a web search to learn more about the affects of uranium radiation versus the other kind. : >
Because this is not an ideal world where everything can run on the sun or the wind. Oh and coal pollution is 100 times more dangerous than a nuclear power meltdown that would only happen every 1000 years or so with current technology.
You assholes that write about this toxic
garbage should be made to eat the waste
that Nuclear Power plants create!
Why aren't you writing about something
clean like solar?........Because you are stupid!
According to wikipedia? ahahaha did you know that ANYONE can post things on wikipedia? Your arguments are not valid. No real credentials on your source.
I couldn't agree more with your premise, but you lost it on a few details. Nuclear plants are more expensive to build BECAUSE of the NRC and their ridiculous level of red tape. Cooling towers cool TURBINE CONDENSATE-- Coal powered plants have cooling towers too. They have nothing to do with how the heat (fire or fission) is created. Nuclear plants are even safer than you describe. Beyond all the security measures you described, I'll put my faith in the several feet thick concrete and steel structures that keep the reactor shielded.