If you listen to the journalists, you would be swayed to believe that if you support anyone other than Hillary Clinton, Obama, Gulliani, Romney, or Huckabee you may as well not vote because no one else has enough support to have a chance of winning. They have been able to convince enough people, for the past several decades to either vote for their choices or not vote at all, to get their choices on the ballots and, therefore, elected. In college Hillary Clinton was known as "Hillary the Red" because of her extreme "Socialist" agenda. For those who are not old enough to remember, "Red" was what "Communists" were called in the "Fifties" and "Sixties" as in "Red China." Journalists are promoting Hillary Clinton as the favorite in the Democratic Party. Many journalist are "Socialistic" to the extreme of being "Communists." Journalists are powerful enough to control who you hear and, therefore who has a chance of being elected. They run polls and publish the results. The problem is that people trust the results when they should question them. As an example of journalists using their positions to choose who will be on your ballot, they choose who will participate in the polls based on their demographics. When polls are run without regard to the "Socialists" demographics, the results are far different than the polls that are selectively conducted by the establishment news media. There may even be fraud in polls that get published. Paste the following link into your internet web browser to see what may have happened at the Iowa GOP straw poll:
http://www.votefraud.org/iowa_straw_poll_2007_report_affidavit_part1.htm
There have been two GOP debates run and guess who the people that actually watched them said won? Not Gulliani, not Romney, Not Huckabee, Ron Paul won both according to the people who entered the online poll during the debates. The news media has a different idea of who should win a debate. Their view is that the people watching the debate should have no say in who won, so they report their choice of who won, not the choice of the people who watched the debate. There have been approximate a dozen online polls of who people would vote for, choices from both parties. Ron Paul won most of them and placed second in all but one of the rest. In that one he placed third. The news media would lead you to believe that Ron Paul is fifth or sixth in the Republican Party, when he is actually the favorite of the people of both parties.
Most of you have probably never heard of Ron Paul. Ron Paul is a doctor (Not another lawyer, Thank God), a gynecologist, who is a Texas Congressman and, more importantly, a "Libertarian." He ran for president in 1988 as the "Libertarian" candidate. He believes in his oath of office. An oath is a solemn promise to the people of the United States, even a sacred promise to God. He supports The Constitution and refuses to vote for any Bill that does not abide by The Constitution. He is the only Republican who voted against the 2001 resolution to use military force against Saddam Hussein. Even Hillary Clinton voted for the resolution. Ron Paul has voiced his opinion that the Iraq invasion was unconstitutional and that it is unconstitutional to maintain an occupational military force in Iraq.
The reason why the "Powers that be" are in control is because they are able to filter the news to the point that some candidates are virtually censored from having a platform to air their positions on the issues. Between now and the 2008 election, you can be sure that the only voices that will be given a platform to air their positions on the issues are Hillary Clinton, Obama, Gulliani, Romney, and Huckabee, the choices of the "Powers that be." If Ron Paul were given half the air time that those candidates will be given, you can bet that he would be our next president!
Published by Joe Btfsplk
Computer Programmer for 45 years! View profile
Is Ron Paul the Subject of a Google Bomb?Google bombs have been used in political campaigns to varying results. If one types "most honest politician" into Google today, they'll find Ron Paul appears. Is this the work...- Ron Paul: The Candidate with the Golden DollarRon Paul is the only candidate running for President of the United States, that has his own Gold, Silver, and Copper Dollars
- Presidential Hopeful Ron Paul: Raising the Roof in Iowa If crowd approval is any indication of votes in the Iowa Straw Poll, Ron Paul is a contender.
Hillary Clinton is Angry when Asked Her Husband's Opinion in the Congo;...As a woman born in Great Britain, I'm not remotely surprised that Hillary Clinton was so angry and here's why.- Ron Paul Doomed to Failure Because He's a White MaleRon Paul is the candidate for change but he can't change his race or sex.
- Do You Know Why You Vote the Way You Do?
- Where Am I Going, and How Do I Get There?
- The Essence of Shakespeare: Henry the IV and Henry the V
- Speaking My Mind, Part 5: The Society
- How to Surf the Web Without Getting Fired
- Why You Should Vote in the 2008 Primaries
- Analysis: Canadian Company Leads in Ron Paul Coverage


1 Comments
Post a CommentYou know, in the last six years I've become more aware of the nasty game being played. I'm elated that you're here to spread the word of truth. We need more people to wake up to what's going on so that we can unleash the ties that bind us to this terrible beast (government).
I feel, without interruption, we are headed down a gloomy road. A road where all of our freedoms are stripped. Our present day so much reminds me of Aldous Huxley's 'Brave New World'.
Ron Paul is, I feel, is our only hope. He is the only candidate willing to unmask the dark agenda of the powers that be. I hope more people wake up and take action. We seriously need a revolution before it's too late.