Why Richard Heene Should Not Pay for Search and Rescue Efforts

Jillita Horton
There's one fat reason why Richard Heene should not have to pay for the search and rescue efforts surrounding his 6-year-old son, Falcon, when it was believed that the boy was inside his father's weather balloon as the balloon soared several thousand feet up into Colorado's skies during the afternoon of October 15.

Let's first assume that the balloon boy saga of Falcon was not a hoax, was not a publicity stunt. Do you still believe that Richard Heene should be required to pay for the search and rescue efforts, which have been estimated at around $28,000 according to "Anderson Cooper Live"? Well, for Richard Heene of "Wife Swap" to be responsible for this expense, he would've had to have done something illegal such as a hoax -- but remember, for purposes of this article, we are assuming that Falcon the Balloon Boy is NOT a hoax.

Now, based on what I've read on posting boards about Richard Heene, the man is a complete whack job, and Falcon has quite the potty mouth. Every single posting by a person who has seen him on "Wife Swap" describes him in a seriously negative way, and that's putting it nicely. Richard Heene has been called psycho, nut job, whack job, brutal, neurotic, out of control, abusive, woman hating, you name it.

So as a result, you may despise Richard Heene without even ever watched "Wife Swap," and thus, feel that he should pay for the search and rescue efforts for balloon boy son Falcon. But ask yourself this: Even though Richard Heene came across as obnoxious, arrogant and reckless on "Wife Swap," AND ASSUMING the balloon was NOT a hoax, what did he do illegally, regarding that now-famous weather balloon?

Is it illegal to have a 20-foot by 5-foot balloon in your backyard? People have far worse things in their back yard. It is perfectly legal to have a 20-foot by 5-foot inflatable balloon in one's back yard. Or isn't it? But of course, it is unlawful to involve your sons in a costly hoax -- if indeed this is what Richard Heene did.

And we still don't know for sure that's what Richard Heene did with Falcon. Again, we're assuming that the balloon boy saga was not a hoax or staged in any way. So Richard Heene likes to build what he calls weather balloons, and apparently sends them off into tornadoes to record magnetism or something like that. Call it crazy, but it's not illegal.

So should Richard Heene pay for search and rescue efforts just because one of his other sons mistakenly reported to him that Falcon was inside an airborne balloon? The brother made an error. Richard Heene, instead of blowing the older boy's observation off as a mistake, took it seriously and called the authorities. This is a normal reaction, though Richard Heene should have known that the flimsy balloon couldn't have possibly supported Falcon's weight - or could it have? The verdict never came in on that.

Yes, Heene could have anchored the balloon better to the ground. He could have had better watch over the entire morning's operation. He could have realized, "Hey, Falcon's too heavy to ride in that balloon" and instead thoroughly searched his premises; Heene should have known that Falcon might have ventured into the attic above the garage; doesn't he know his own son? "Wipe Swap" depicted Richard Heene as head of a savage household and submissive wife.

However, despite all that, it all comes down to that one question: Is it illegal to have a small weather balloon in one's yard? This whole balloon boy saga unfolded only because the older boy jumped to the wrong conclusion.

After reading what tons of "Wife Swap" viewers have said about Richard Heene and his flaky wife, and after seeing a few YouTube videos of Richard Heene, I have concluded that he and his wife have serious problems and are recklessly raising their boys. These nuts actually make their boys sleep in their clothes and shoes so that, at a moment's notice, they can be awakened and hurried into the car to accompany their parents' storm-chasing in the middle of the night!

Richard Heene, at this point, will not be required to pay for search and rescue expenses, and thus far, he is not suspected by authorities of staging the whole balloon boy incident. However, further investigation should be taken, simply because Falcon, the balloon boy, made a disturbing comment when asked by Richard why he didn't respond when his name was called.

Falcon Heene replied something to the effect of, "Because of the show." Daddy's reaction at that moment appeared to be that of a man whose cover had been blown by a nervous child. I'm skeptical; this really sounds fishy. If there's more to the balloon boy saga than what has been currently revealed, it will hopefully come out very soon. If it turns out that Falcon the Balloon Boy indeed was a hoax, then YES, Richard Heene should pay the full $28,000.

Published by Jillita Horton

Freelance writer for fitness print magazines and fitness Web sites; ghost writer for fitness Web sites   View profile

12 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Not much interested 10/19/2009

    Has Heene got a job? Do people hire mentally unbalanced? How did he reproduce once let alone three times...

  • Guest 2 10/19/2009

    They should be subject to trial. If found guilty, then they should absolutely pay restitution and possibly do jail time. As it is they're getting the attention that they wanted,(if it was a hoax), and now all the nut jobs out there that might consider doing the same should see that there are serious consequences for it.

  • Guest 10/17/2009

    If they are found guilty of breaking laws (hoax) then yes. If not, then they used the public resources as they were meant to be used. Please don't make another person in an emergency situation have to waste precious time and have to wonder about the possible financial implications of calling for help. Everything does not come down to money.

    What if these parents (strange folks that they seem to be) waited to call. They would be persecuted for that too don't you think? Don't react to one incident and put someone else in danger. Let everyone take the time to investigate and if indeed they have broken laws then prosecute. No need for a rush to judgment or to override our presumption of innocence.

    My biggest concern is for the children and they have children's services looking into it from what I heard on the news today.

    What does this guy do for a living anyhow? How do they afford what looks like expense "scientific" stuff?

  • Orson Wells 10/16/2009

    Yes! They should pay! Colorado will charge you for mountain rescues, whether or not it was your fault for getting lost on a mountain. So why not this scenario?!
    Hennes are narcissistic morons!
    Martians are attacking Earth! PANIC! This is copycat version of War Of The Worlds by Orson Wells, only instead of being broadcast by radio, we have upgraded to worldwide TV and Internet!

  • Chris 10/16/2009

    If anyone thinks that parents will hesitate to call for help for their children if these MORONS are prosecuted and fined... then god help YOUR OWN children; Darwin said it best... thinning out the herd, survival of the fittest! Make em pay and pay big!

  • Guest 10/16/2009

    They should pay whether it is a hoax or not. They are getting paid for all of their publicity appearances and this money should go to pay for the cost of the search. As a parent%2C I would be eternally grateful to the rescue workers and would want any monies received to go to the rescuers. What would have happened had there been a %22real%22 emergency while everyone was off chasing after the Balloon Boy%3F%3F

  • Hmm.. 10/16/2009

    Well I believe they should pay for the search irregardless of wheither they committed a crime other than child endangerment by having the balloon tethered low to the ground in their yard. You can't have a pool without a fence, can't leave a refrigerator on your property a child can climb into or a gun lying around. I do believe it was a hoax. but even if it wasn't (on the parents part)they are responsible.An example should be set for reasonable caution. This won't make parents not call for help , and most parents would pay anything necessary to get their kids back whole and safe .

  • Michael Ki 10/16/2009

    I'm no psychic, but I've seen the Blitzer interview and it looks as though the whole family is trying their best [not to blow the cover on something]. Maybe I've seen a couple of 'Lie to Me' episodes, but I can spot a liar when I see one. When Blitzer tried to ask what the answer,"You had said we did this for the show", was about, Heene just acted as if he was appalled without any provocation. He knew what the question implied because he was guilty - and most likely solely responsible - for what transpired. Blitzer should have just pressed him more instead of backing off because he was clearly on the right track with his line of questioning. It was obviously a stunt to get his name back in the headlines. It's even probable he did this to get his scientific team a reality show.

  • Penn 10/16/2009

    As Bryant said if this is not undoubtedly proven to be a hoax then the family should not be charged. If the family were to be charged with doubt hanging in the air about whether or not this was a hoax then in the future other parents might be hesitant to call the authorities when their child went missing.

  • Bryant Arms 10/16/2009

    The family should pay for the rescue attempt if it is proven BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that balloon boy is a hoax.
    But there is too much room for doubt to let that happen.
    I can easily imagine plausible explanations about how the young brat Phoenix could have behaved the way he did even if that was not a hoax.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.