According to the American Cancer Society, secondhand smoke is the third leading cause of preventable death in the United States. For those that do survive, they face some or all of the following: asthma, bronchitis, pneumonia, respiratory infections, ear infections, lung cancer, heart disease, cognitive impairment and many other things. Secondhand smoke has also been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency as a known cause of cancer.
The United States Surgeon General has found that there is no safe level of exposure to second hand smoke. For example, brief exposure has been linked to an increased risk for heart attacks. This is because short exposures to second hand smoke causes blood platelets to become sticker, damages the lining of blood vessels, decreases coronary flow velocity reserves and reduces heart rate variability.
And, whereas it has been shown that eliminating smoking in indoor spaces fully protects nonsmokers from exposure to secondhand smoke and that separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning the air, and ventilating buildings cannot eliminate exposures of nonsmokers to secondhand smoke. As theHealth Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General, put it, air cleaning systems can remove only large particles, not the smaller particles or gases found in secondhand smoke. Also, it has been shown that routine operation of ventilation systems actually spread and distribute the secondhand smoke throughout a building. Even the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, the preeminent U.S. body on ventilation issues, has concluded that ventilation technology cannot be relied on to control health risks from secondhand smoke exposure.
The only way to truly protect the health of our citizens from secondhand smoke is to ban all smoking in public places.
Some opponents of this legislation may argue that eliminating smoking in public places would cost the tobacco industry many jobs. However, this is not the case, as the industry would simply shift their focus to other types of tobacco that are not smoked and are therefore safer to the general public, such as chewing tobacco.
By prohibiting smoking in all public places, we will greatly reduce the number of people suffering from the horrors of secondhand smoke.
Published by C Tripp
Smoking in Public Places: Should it Be Banned?This college paper was done for a Philosophy class at Clemson University. It details the effects of second-hand smoke, and if these effects should warrant a banning of smoking...- Smoking in Public Places: To Ban or Not to Ban?This article is about the dangers of second hand smoke and its effects on individuals.
- Should Smoking Be Allowed in Public Places?This debate rages on and this article looks at what defines a public place, the rights of smokers, and why the answer varies from situation from situation.
- Banning Things in Public Places: Smoking | Cell PhonesSome thoughts on laws banning certain public behavior
South Carolina Tourist Town Bans SmokingMount Pleasant town council passes ordinance to ban smoking in most public places. They join a growing list of South Carolina municipalities that try to reduce public smoking.
- Ban Smoking in NC Public Places
- Why Ban Smoking in Public Places?: Arguments in Favor
- Should Smoking Be Allowed in Public Places Given All These Facts?
- Should Smoking Be Banned in All Public Places?
- Oklahoma's Smoking in Public Places
- Should Smoking Be Banned in All Public Places?
- Washington's Smoking in Public Places Act



