The reason the government feels they need to rescue all of the finance and automotive companies is because of the number of people employed and/or invested in them. However, if they were just allowed to fail, new companies would take their places and the employees would be hired there. The investments in these companies is much less than it previously was because their requests for bailout funds cause a drop in investor confidence, so the investments lost would not be a large problem either.
There are several benefits to letting these companies fail as well. One benefit would be that the new companies that replace the failures will be able to be better focused on the future. The existing companies had too many expenses involved in changing their operations, but new companies can start with a different plan and avoid the issue of having to change. Another advantage of having new companies replace the old is that the new companies would be able to learn from the failed companies mistakes and keep from having the same problems themselves. After seeing how all the companies before them failed, the replacements will have a better idea of what kinds of things will lead to their failing. A final reason for which it would make sense to let the current companies fail is that the unions would also be lost. The auto industry is prevented from cutting costs because of the unions, without them they would be able to operate much more efficiently.
As for individuals, there is much less reason to help them. When a company fails there is an effect on many people, but an individual's failure does not have a large effect on anyone but themselves. The only reason for which people would be helped with making their mortgage payments is to help the banks from having to foreclose on the house which usually is not profitable. So there is not a very good reason to help individuals who have made bad decisions either.
Overall, it seems most beneficial not to bailout any more businesses or individuals. Then the government would have less of a deficit and could increase spending to try to correct the economic downturn, which would possibly be more effective than the bailout system.
Published by Kyle
I am a real estate investor in Indiana. I have several units which I rent out. I am also a student at Indiana University, studying accounting, real estate, and sociology. View profile
- Surviving an Economic DownturnPeople can and do survive and even succeed in an economic downturn. How can you make money and profit during difficult economic times?
- Pets and the Economic Downturn: Some Observations from ColoradoWorking with veterinary service providers in two Colorado metro areas, I have recently witnessed the effects of the economic downturn on pets. Amid the housing and credit crises, with food and fuel costs steadily risi...
- Make it Personal During an Economic Downturn, Your Connections Are KeyAdvice for small businesses on how to survive an economic downturn .
- Shopping Your Way Out of the Economic DownturnThere are plenty of great deals to be found in spite of, and in many cases because of, the economic downturn. Plan early, get creative and shop smart!
- Tapping into the Law of Attraction During an Economic DownturnThe Great Recession has caused millions of people to know what it's like to experience scarcity. Consequently, a lot of people are turning to articles on frugality for advice. But have you considered riding out the ec...
- Citibank Bailout May Leave You Holding the Bag in More Ways Than One
- Will Barack Obama Make His First Big Mistake by Supporting an Auto Industry Bailout?
- Ford, GM, and Chrysler - Can the Big Three Be Saved Without Massive Taxpayer Bailo...
- Bailouts - "Too Big to Fail" is Too Big to Exist!
- Surviving the Curent Economic Downturn
- How Teenagers Survive the Economic Downturn
- Job Hunting During Economic Downturn or Anytime
