12

Why is "White Pride" Considered "Taboo"?

Michael D
Barack Obama is running for the position of President of the United States, yet he openly admits going to a church, Trinity Church of Christ, that admits to being "committed to Africa". Their "12-Point Value System" includes the following: Commitment to the Black Community, Commitment to the Black Family, Pledge Allegiance to All Black Leadership Who Embrace the Black Value System and Personal Commitment to Embracement of the Black Value System. Obama himself said his heart "belongs to Africa." He has also said, quietly, that he would put Africa on welfare should he win the presidency. Why is this all but ignored in the media? Would a white candidate with the same views for white ancestry also be ignored? Absolutely not. For some reason, people in America still believe that whites have more rights than any other race. This is simply not true! Do you actually think it's culturally acceptable for us Whites to openly speak about racial pride, and Blacks are not? Think about this for a moment. How would the media, and society, react if say David Duke ran for President again? Or, take any white person that goes to a church that says "we are committed to white people." Would they be accepted, or would they be considered a genocidal racist? You know the answer to that. To have racial pride is a healthy and natural thing, but to be the President of the United States with Obama's views is an entirely different matter. For the media to keep quiet abut this is absolutely shameful. Political-correctness has gone overboard.

If Sen. Obama expects to be President of the United States, he owes this country an explanation, not for his lineage or for his religion, but for his association with a racist organization that pledges allegiance to a foreign land. Why isn't Barack Obama's faith-based problem making national headlines and the nightly news?

Speaking further about White racial pride acceptance in America, are you aware that the NAACP and the Anti-Defamation League (Jewish group) are trying to have the Shamrock (4-leaf clover) and St. Patrick's Day outlawed because they are considered "racist"? Why? Because they are connected to white history. That's all. But BLACK HISTORY MONTH is on every calender in the country and openly accepted. Any White History Month to speak of? No way! That would be considered simply hateful, bigoted and racist as Hell!

Take the whole Imus "nappy headed ho" fiasco for example. What part of that term is racist? None. Black rappers, actors, etc., say it all the time in movies and on cd's. But, because a white personality said it, he was called a "racist". Now, look at Beyonce. She publicly stated that she "only makes music for my black peoples." No word from the press, but her record sales went way down after that.

I have videos on YouTube of black "leaders" and preachers calling for white genocide, but nothing happens!! Why? Because blacks are allowed to talk about black pride and "evil Whitey" without being labeled racists, and whites that even mention any sort of pride are called "Nazis." The black ex-Harvard ex-professor named Kamau Kambon said live on C-SPAN, "We need to exterminate white people off the face of the planet!" Hardly anything was mentioned by the media. I show videos on the net of blacks committing horrible crimes because CNN, FOX, MSNBC refuse to. What am I called for showing actual, factual events? Nazi, racist and hater! Why? Because "Whitey" is supposed to accept whatever non-whites do, no matter what. They call it being "pro-diversity". And when "Whitey" says he's/she's tired of seeing whites being beaten and murdered by non-whites, it's considered "hateful and racist."

Another thing to consider is this. How many White Only Miss America Pageants are there? Zero. But there is a Black Miss America Pageant held every year. Is there a National Association for the Advancement of WHITE People? No. But there is a National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). There's also the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington D.C. Does anyone speak specifically for whites or white interests in our government? Of course not. Why, that would be considered down-right racist. Any "White-only" magazines on store shelves? Nope. Any "White-only" TV channels? Nope. Any "White-only" college scholarships? Nope. Any "White-only" student organizations? Nope.

Why? Why? Why??? Because whites are NOT allowed to show any sort of pride, togetherness, or heritage. Those that do are automatically labeled "We are constantly urged to shy away from our own history and self pride and to accept "diversity" instead. The funny thing is that non-whites preach pro-diversity, but yet, they themselves have race-specific organizations like student groups, scholarships and even churches where whites are not allowed to participate. Why can't we whites have any "for us only" things like other races do? Why, that is considered racist.

Published by Michael D

I've been freelancing as a writer for over a year, and have published articles in various publications. I've also had a poem and a short-story published in a national book titled, "Rivers Of Fortitude". I'm...  View profile

23 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Jay Braun9/17/2009

    great article and very accurate. I dont know what is more sick. obama being elected or 43% of white people that are self hating voting for him.

  • gene willis3/9/2009

    because,this is not the united states of america.the liberals and the black eleatists have changed it.we are now addressed as.....united sovereignty of african-america!isnt this nice,not only do we lose our identity,but also our nation as a whole!

  • Todaysbest4me11/11/2008

    Who is really white?...we all have diverse heritages. I'm part, English, Irish, Scottish and German....and while reading up on previous presidents history, we find at least 5 others who had black heritage (though they didn't talk about it). I also found that many so called white Americans have Indian blood. The article I read showed black faced Caucasians as well as white faced Negroes. I believe that the race card is over-played. It is time to get over our past and move on.

  • GODDESS11/10/2008

    I believe a vast majority of people have no problem with whites being proud of their heritage. Instead of asking non-whites why whites are called racist for being proud of their race, why don't you ask white supremacists why they feel a white person must be racist in order to be proud of their heritage?

    Also, why do you criticize Rev. Wright without criticizing what made him the way he is? Had their been no KKK, there would have been no Rev. Wright, Min. Louis Farrakhan, and others with their extreme views.

    The NEED most black people feel to have 'black' oriented outlets is due to the exclusion implemented by the white power structure.

    I, for one, am hoping we can all move past this 'chip' that's on our shoulders and embrace our nation's creed to treat ALL people equally.

    I hope this helps.

  • Cedric henry11/9/2008

    White pride has been associated with white supremacy. Black pride is about love for your self and culture. But in addition black pride understands and respects others and only loves itself so that it can have this respect.

  • Michael D (author)11/9/2008

    "Racism" is Affirmative-Action. Jobs being filled by "minorities" based on their skin color, not on their ability to do a specific job. "A white person can count on being able to use checks or credit cards and not have his race factored into whether he is considered financially trustworthy." Gee, that's just horrible. I guess that's why Freddie Mac and Fannie May started "Bank Affirmative-Action" under Bill Clinton's orders. http://www.colorofcrime.net/2008/10/clinton-administrations-bank.html They were FORCED to give "minorities" special mortgage rates, even though they were completely unable to pay a single penny.

    Yeah, that racist "whitey", huh? Try getting anything for free because you're white in 2008! It NEVER happens! Free is for "minorities" only!

  • Joyce Distler6/6/2008

    It's called racism.

  • Kat Sanchez3/7/2008

    While whites don't get the exclusive clubs, churches, schools, groups, etc., they do reap the advantages of "white privilege" still prevelent in this country. A white author can write a book without having to represent his whole race. A white person can dress however they want without their clothing choices being attributed to their race. White children can learn in school that their race made this country what it is today. A white person can count on being able to use checks or credit cards and not have his race factored into whether he is considered financially trustworthy. http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/emc598ge/Unpacking.html

  • Nick WPWW3/7/2008

    i got an idea to solve all this petty talk seperation of race im white but i believe a famous black man had it right malcom x he was a sepritist and so am i im white and proud i whouldent have it anyother way

  • Cnd2/27/2008

    Look up your history on welfare and foodstamps my dear. Department of welfare was made for white famlies in the 30's 40's 50's 60's. When they went to war for our country only white famlies were allowed to get assistants. Our african american famlies survive by working jobs, and owning our own business. Get the record straight there are more white people on assistants more than ever!

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.