Will Alabama Go Through with the Execution of Thomas Arthur
New Evidence of DNA Could Prove His Innocence
Arthur has been convicted of the murder of Troy Wicker, not once, but three times. In all three trials, attorneys for the defendant where new to Capital Murder trials and it was the first one for all three. Jury members have since said if they had been allowed to view all the evidence, they would not have found him guilty. Arthur claims he has new DNA evidence from the crime scene that could prove his innocence, but because Alabama, the only state in the nation that does not provide a death row inmate with an Attorney for his post conviction appeal process, Arthur filed late. The new evidence that could prove his innocence is being refused. He has other witnesses and testimony as well."Arthur will be the first person in the United States to be executed without ever having his FIRST Habeas Corpus reviewed, or a State or Federal review" according to the website."
The Supreme Court has blocked executions until they decide next year if Lethal Injection is cruel and unusual and goes against the Nations Constitution. Will Alabama go on with this execution, despite the fact that this issue has not yet been resolved, or will they do the humane thing and grant this man a stay, and allow his DNA testing to be done.
Sherrie is asking for help from the public to make calls or faxes to the Governor, and is hoping people will read the facts on the website.
More information can be read at this website:
Source:
Published by Dee
I am a prison activist/advocate writing about prison issues, hoping to make awareness, and bring reform. One out of every thirty-two people in the USA are currently on parole, probation or in prison. I am ow... View profile
- Lethal Injection May Cause Horrific Pain and Slow SuffocationA new study shows that the long-accepted practice of lethal injection may cause some prisoners to experience excruciating pain and live suffocation when put to death.
- Death by Lethal Injection: Does the Physician Contradict the Hippocratic Oath?When a criminal is put to death by lethal injection, a physician is required to assist in the process. Opponents of the death penalty cite this is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath.
Lethal Injection: Is it Really Cruel and Unusual?How many botched executions will take place before this method of execution is banned?- Capital Punishment's Lethal Injection Too Much of a Punishment?The administration of a fatal dose of drugs was considered more humane than other methods used over the years. The fact is, whether this deemed excruciatingly painful or not, the inmate is sentenced to death.
American Confidence in the Death Penalty ErodingCapital punishment is used less and less as Americans questions its fairness and accuracy.
- In Search of ... King Arthur
- King Arthur: Knight of the Net
- A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court: A Study of Social and Political Satire
- Ohio Death Row Inmates Claim Lethal Injection Unconstitutional
- How is the Lethal Injection Administered in the United States?
- Lethal Injection is Anything but Humane
- Possible Lethal Injection Cocktail Change
- Jury member later said that if they had viewed evidence he would not have been found guilty
- Alabama will not look at the new evidence





15 Comments
Post a CommentFUBAR
If they allow this man to die without the DNA testing, this is nothing more than legalized murder. How could our judicial system be so blind as to ignore this kind of evidence?
Maybe not Deez. Some people are so PRO death penalty, they don't even care if the person is guilty or not. Actualy some family members of victims are opposed to executions
"Kill Her" and "You Scumbag" must have been family members of the murder victim, don't you think?
You'd think if it was a matter of life and death he would have met the deadline!
Execution is inumane!
One look at the DNA can't hurt but only one. Some inmates just stall time.
Stop the executions!!!!!!
Justice is not being served if they don't look at all the evidence.
Excellent article they need to use the evidence. That is horrible